Mars 3 (Various Topics Merged) |
Mars 3 (Various Topics Merged) |
Dec 3 2007, 05:20 AM
Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
Good, that makes three dreamers at UMSF. How many more? The denizens of Earth need Mars...more than they know. -------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 02:56 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
another more recent thread (36 years on mars) has some reference to the famous Mars 3 image and to Ted's work on that image -etc. (thanks Ted)
My question is there a known 'original' or something that the surrogate original (!?) ...something that isn't a lossy compressed image? Or am I barking up the wrong tree here.... thanks in advance! -------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 05:22 PM
Post
#48
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
another more recent thread (36 years on mars) has some reference to the famous Mars 3 image and to Ted's work on that image -etc. (thanks Ted) My question is there a known 'original' or something that the surrogate original (!?) ...something that isn't a lossy compressed image? Or am I barking up the wrong tree here.... thanks in advance! Well, it isn't lossy in the sense that we think of lossy today (jpegs, etc) - what we have are screenshots. Perhaps the original transmission tapes are somewhere in the Russian archives. It has been so long that even if they are still there somewhere, they may have disintigrated unless there were copies made at some point. -------------------- |
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 06:13 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 568 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Silesia Member No.: 299 |
Is incredible, these beautiful pictures are almost realtime shots from the surface of another planet, and they comes daily in the last 4 years. I really hope this will continue to be the normality in the future, with a continuous coverage through MSL, EXO-mars and other long-duration missions. EXO-mars' data released daily by ESA ? Are you kidding? -------------------- Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html |
|
|
Dec 4 2007, 04:28 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
EXO-mars' data released daily by ESA ? Are you kidding? Hehe, Peter, I understand your sarcasm but I deliberately included EXO-mars in the hope to see a change in the PR ESA policy in the future... at the end, perhaps, it depends also from public opinion pressure! -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
Dec 4 2007, 04:48 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 401 Joined: 5-January 07 From: Manchester England Member No.: 1563 |
Good, that makes three dreamers at UMSF. How many more? The denizens of Earth need Mars...more than they know. I'd count myself as one more. Although I don't think we should stop at mars -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Dec 4 2007, 06:55 PM
Post
#52
|
Guests |
Wait one minute, a topic on spacecraft lost around the red planet or on its surface without mentioning the " Great Ghalactic Ghoul ", an imaginary monster living somewhere out around the orbit of the red planet that just likes to destroy spacecraft
This 'absurd' explanation for lost spacecraft was created by Donald Neff, a journalist of TIME magazine |
|
|
Dec 12 2007, 06:57 PM
Post
#53
|
||||||
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
MY SPECULATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SOVIET MARS 3 LANDER IMAGE
I cropped the ‘probable data’ portion from the original image. I wrote three C/C++ programs to reduce only image noise: • Eliminate salt and pepper noise with a modified rank order filter • Reduce Gaussian noise with a modified sigma filter • Reduce other noise (speckle and non-Gaussian) via normalization The modifications I made to several well known filter algorithms (Lee’s sigma filter, the Frost MSE filter, and the rank order filters, -etc.) were done in such a way as to only adjust noisy pixels and to leave the rest of the image untouched. The programs characterized each pixel as either: ‘image’ or ‘highly probable noise’; the programs then assigned the noisy pixels new values depending on their noise type: rank order median for salt and pepper, sigma values or Gaussian, -etc. In the end, over 64% of the final pixels have retained their exact original values. I then wrote another C program to zoom out the image (3x) using the bi-cubic spline interpolation algorithm from the Harley & Weeks image processing handbook. My Top 4 Interpretations of the Resulting Image (1) Most Probable - (bright horizontal line at the bottom) - Looking down at the ground at something less then 45 degrees, but not under the ship. The dark area is disturbed soil; may be caused by a skidding/rolling type landing. We are looking out less then 2 meters (?). The bright line is a power up artifact of the camera and/or a reflection off one of the unfolded shiny metal shrouds on the lander. This composition is reminiscent of Surveyor, Viking, Venera, and other landers looking at or near their feet as one of their first images. ( no image - just flip the one above) 2) Possible - (flip the image to any of the two vertical orientations) Looking down again at the ground, possibly an out of focus scrape mark from the ship skidding/rolling or just the soil beneath the camera. We are looking down at less than 1 meter (?) (3) Most Wishful - (bright horizontal line at top) Looking out at the horizon with a dark ridge in the foreground – notice the ‘rocks’ in and on the dark foreground ridge... Notice the large rock near the top right near the bright horizon. Notice the rock near the bottom right at the trailing edge of the dark ridge. Notice the rock(s) on the dark ridge near the left edge of the image. Notice the dusty atmosphere near the horizon (at top). We are looking outward from meters to the local horizon (a hundred meters?) (4) Consensus since the 1970’s - This whole ‘image’ is just noise and my programs and your programs and you and I are just hallucinating, i.e. a Soviet Rorschach test. Some other points to consider: - Soviet experts (early 1970s) agreed that this image was just noise. - The camera’s longer axis should be the vertical axis of the image – making interpretation 1, 2, and 3, scenes from a craft lying on its side. - The landing was during a regional/global dust storm - The available lighting was supposedly 50lux (low lighting) I interpret the uniformly bright area in the image as the point where the vidicon camera was turned on. It then AGC’ed within a few lines to a normal gain-level. I suggest this because the noise pixels in the original (un-cropped) image just above this bright area (for ~10 lines before the bright area and parallel to the bright line across the image) are uniformly brighter by a few percent - compared to the noise pixels in all the lines before it; This statistically significant observation suggests the this may be the actual turn-on time of the vidicon; then we see the vidicon ‘blooming’ (i.e. all signal, no contrast, the white area); and then the gain control takes over….and we have a noisy image for ~60 more lines before the transmission stops. Alternatively, since this ‘brighter’ noise is spatially correlated to the bright line, it just may be a photographic artifact of the stupid screen-shot that we have been forced to deal with for the last 30+ years. I would really love to get a hold of the original Soviet data! Final Conjecture: Mars 3 landed but may have skidded or tipped over during the final approach. The usual suspects are rocks, rockets, chutes, winds, -etc. The damaged lander started its science sequence. The first image was in the process of beaming down to Earth. The orientation of the camera to the noisy image fragment suggests that the lander is not in the upright position. After 70 scan lines reach Earth, the signal is suddenly lost. What failed? Was it the transmitter, the electrical system, the final remnants of the propellant leaking from broken rocket nozzles onto panels and into the system electronics or maybe the battered lander just slouched and started rolling over again as a result of a precarious perch or the slumping soil and rock mechanics from the hard landing… To the MRO Crew: Please take some lucky MRO images of the Mars 3 landing site for Christmas! Its easy…look in and near northern Ptolemy Crater , 45° S, 158° W; you should see a dusty old parachute and a nearby shiny Soviet lander lying on its side! Thanks!! Parting Shot -- A False Color Image of the Wishful Horizon Interp: -------------------- CLA CLL
|
|||||
|
||||||
Dec 12 2007, 07:50 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10153 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
"Its easy…look in and near northern Ptolemy Crater , 45° S, 158° W; "
45° S, 158° W (+ or - 200 km or thereabouts). Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Dec 12 2007, 08:02 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
So a 400km x 400km search box. 160,000 sqkm
That's only 2500+ HiRISE images - what's the problem. Doug |
|
|
Dec 14 2007, 03:51 PM
Post
#56
|
|||||
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
A brief scan of the web turned up these images of the MARS 3 lander in a Moscow Museum
the cameras are on the top (there were two, I believe... Here is the ship with lander in the aeroshell enjoy comrades! -------------------- CLA CLL
|
||||
|
|||||
Dec 15 2007, 08:18 AM
Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
|
|
|
Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Dec 15 2007, 05:54 PM
Post
#58
|
Guests |
Thanks for sharing those photos and only the black & white photo shows the arm which deployed the PrOP-M, which was a small tethered rover at the end of an arm on these Soviet-Russian Mars pod landers which were based on the Luna 9 four-petalled opening/righting mechanism!
|
|
|
Dec 16 2007, 08:36 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
We have had 8 more inches of snow today on top of the 10 inches from a few days ago...
...so I was shovelling the driveway and heaving snow and then watching it roll down if i didn't get it over the top of the heap... I am putting a stake in the ground: based on the proximity of all landers to craters and then Oppy actually rolling into one, I speculate that the Mars 3 is tipped over in the bottom a crater. probably not a very deep one, but I conjecture it caught the slope and rolled over to the bottom. The picture I call 'the most probable' would then show the view at the bottom of a crater with undisturbed and disturbed soil (e.g. Oppy's airbag prints, MER tracks in general, -etc). Now if the HiRise guys just listened to my instructions on how to snap a picture of Mars 3, we will all have a wonderful Christmas present -------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
Dec 16 2007, 09:34 PM
Post
#60
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1084 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France Member No.: 172 |
Some other points to consider: - Soviet experts (early 1970s) agreed that this image was just noise. - The camera’s longer axis should be the vertical axis of the image – making interpretation 1, 2, and 3, scenes from a craft lying on its side. - The landing was during a regional/global dust storm - The available lighting was supposedly 50lux (low lighting) Dear PDP8 : agreed ! Here are the original "data" in better format + its stretched on its good vertical axis. The resulting "noise", processed this way, could easily be interpreted as a dark surface seen under a dusty sky with the Sun being hidden by the camera cover just outside the left of the "picture"... If this is indeed an "image"... If the Mars 3 s/c worked well until reaching the surface... If this successful 20 sec data is not Soviet propaganda... Too many "ifs" !!! |
|
|
||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 11:26 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |