IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

27 Pages V  « < 20 21 22 23 24 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Start of the Drive East, Up to Cambridge Bay
Stu
post Aug 10 2010, 11:49 AM
Post #316


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



I do love these rover self-portraits... smile.gif

http://twitpic.com/2ddl4o

3D image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 10 2010, 09:38 PM
Post #317


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (Nirgal @ Aug 10 2010, 12:03 PM) *
Thanks for the prompt updates !
brief question: Is the current drive-every-other-sol pattern due to normal "restricted sols" or is the "resting day" in between drives still needed to to avoid elevated wheel currents ?

Here's the answer, I think. Yet another driving sol.

02327::p0653::03::6::0::0::6::0::12::navcam_3x1_az_90_3_bpp
02327::p1205::08::2::0::0::2::0::4::front_haz_penultimate_0.5_bpp_pri17
02327::p1211::03::2::0::0::2::0::4::ultimate_front_haz_1_bpp_pri_15
02327::p1254::02::2::0::0::2::0::4::front_haz_fault_pri15_4bpp
02327::p1301::06::2::0::0::2::0::4::rear_haz_penultimate_1bpp_pri17
02327::p1312::07::2::0::0::2::0::4::rear_haz_ultimate_2_bpp_pri15
02327::p1354::01::2::0::0::2::0::4::rear_haz_fault_pri15_4bpp
02327::p1757::01::14::0::0::14::0::28::navcam_7x1_az_270_1_bpp
02327::p1991::07::4::0::0::4::0::8::nav_2x1_rvraz_0_1_bpp_pri42
02327::p1994::06::1::0::0::1::0::2::nav_1x1_MovieFrame_Leye_1bpp_pri72
02327::p2601::05::4::2::0::0::2::8::pancam_tau_L78R48
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NW71
post Aug 10 2010, 09:56 PM
Post #318


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 19-January 10
From: Grimsby, N.E. Lincs, UK
Member No.: 5179



Eduardo,

If sol 2327 is another driving day and if it's another 70 to 80 ms or so am I right in thinking the two rovers are going to be very close to a combined 30kms of roving?

If so, that is simply incredible.

Neil
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Aug 10 2010, 09:58 PM
Post #319


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I'd said that Oppy is tosol 2326 at ~22200m. As Spirit is at 7730 m, another 70m Oppy drive will give a Total of 30 kms i.e. 50 times what has been scheduled. I'll have to move this post to "Some Statistics...".
Go Little Young Lady, Go... wheel.gif

Edit: congratulations Neil, you beat me by 2 minutes...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NW71
post Aug 10 2010, 10:03 PM
Post #320


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 19-January 10
From: Grimsby, N.E. Lincs, UK
Member No.: 5179



QUOTE (climber @ Aug 10 2010, 10:58 PM) *
a Total of 30 kms i.e. 50 times what has been scheduled. I'll have to move this post to "Some Statistics...".
Go Little Young Lady, Go... wheel.gif

Edit: congratulations Neil, you beat me by 2 minutes...


Thanks climber, but the congratulations should go to the MER team for the miracles they appear to perform on a daily basis and to you and Eduardo and others who convey this information so promptly and in such an easy to understand manner.

Thanks for such a prompt reply. Feel free to move my previous post if it's in the wrong topic as well! smile.gif

Neil
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Aug 11 2010, 04:10 AM
Post #321


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



Some Twitter comments from Scott on the latest drive:

Well, that's a lot more like it. Our last drive got almost 10m of extra distance thanks to the new drive-extension trick! Still waiting for downlink that'll help explain what's scaring Oppy away from driving farther. Maybe we can tweak params to do even better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 11 2010, 10:06 AM
Post #322


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



The latest drive (sol 2327) was a little bit short; "only" 45m. Nothing strange given the lack of post-drive pancams yesterday.
Here's today's navcam mosaic where I highlighted a sequence of rock patches to the left (actually NE). They are clearly visible on HiRISE (see GE version attached). A fracture maybe?
Attached Image

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Aug 11 2010, 02:31 PM
Post #323


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Very, very ripply...

http://twitpic.com/2dpgyh


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Aug 11 2010, 03:13 PM
Post #324


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Fortunately we're past those particular ripples after tosol's drive. There's another patch right in front of us, and then a very smooth stretch that you can see in the orbital views or in this new pancam:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...2M1.JPG?sol2327
That'll be a taste of the flat terrain to come. It's still a ways before we're completely out of the bigger ripples, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Burmese
post Aug 11 2010, 05:10 PM
Post #325


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 27-April 05
Member No.: 365



Maybe they intend to angle NE up that fracture, then cut back east across the smooth rocky patch? The Ripples E and ESE are a bit heavy by comparison.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 11 2010, 06:46 PM
Post #326


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Dunno. And here's another piece to the puzzle from Scott's twitter.

Today's drive will likely be cut short by science, anyway: we're stopping early so we can image some big ol' ripples along the path.

(I love this back-seat driving) biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 11 2010, 07:39 PM
Post #327


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I love it so much, I broke the tradition of a life time and found an avatar smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Aug 11 2010, 08:10 PM
Post #328


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Based on Maxwell's comment and the drive direction images, I'd hazard a guess that we'll head more or less straight east and stop here:
Attached Image

That should give us a decent view of the little crater just to the SE.

Not so much back seat driving as back seat prognostication?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Aug 11 2010, 08:19 PM
Post #329


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



That was my take too but I didn't included it above because I thought it might be too far (another 40m?) to be precisely reached on a single drive. Let's see.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Aug 11 2010, 09:18 PM
Post #330


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



I think we're about to enter a very interesting area... I'm particularly interested in one feature not too far up ahead...

http://twitpic.com/2dsndu/full


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

27 Pages V  « < 20 21 22 23 24 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 09:08 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.