IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

29 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
Dawn Survey Orbit Phase, First orbital phase
tasp
post Jul 19 2011, 04:12 AM
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



Love the "asteroid size comparison poster", amazing to see all the suspects in a police lineup style poster, and LOL, I gets my 1 pixel Itakowa comparison!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
antipode
post Jul 19 2011, 04:34 AM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 314
Joined: 1-October 06
Member No.: 1206



I can't wait to see...errrr...the antipode of that crater! Mega chaotic terrain?

P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Jul 19 2011, 04:36 AM
Post #33


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



QUOTE (MarkG @ Jul 18 2011, 11:02 PM) *
Also, mass wasting from the crater sides does not seem to explain the 5-km-ish spaced parallel ridges on the crater floor. I'm wondering if they are ridges of olivine....


They could be pressure ridges between adjacent debris flows.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Jul 19 2011, 10:15 AM
Post #34


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



A little bit of Vesta on Mars?:

[attachment=24854:MarsRA_sm.jpg]

And on Earth?:

[attachment=24855:eastspringcomp.png]

(Double Spring landslide complex, Oregon)

I had a heck of a time finding a decent example of a terrestrial landslide to compare to Vesta. If the grooved terrain is indeed a system of debris flows, they may turn out to be the finest example of the process anywhere in the Solar System.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 19 2011, 11:17 AM
Post #35


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



I was intrigued by the quick look Cassini got at the conical craters of Saturn's Phoebe. Now it looks like we'll get a much better look at the same sort of crater on Vesta. The images below are very roughly to the same scale. Although Vesta is a little more than twice the diameter of phoebe, the craters in question seem to be about the same size on both bodies.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 19 2011, 11:35 AM
Post #36


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Drkskywxlt @ Jul 18 2011, 05:59 PM) *
For somewhat not geologically-minded, what is reminding all of you about Miranda? I don't see the similarities really...

From The Planetary Society Blog:
"The interior of that south polar basin sure looks weird. All around the central peak are chevron-shaped ridgy features that bring to mind Miranda -- which, by the way, is very similar in size to Vesta."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drkskywxlt
post Jul 19 2011, 12:37 PM
Post #37


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Jul 19 2011, 07:35 AM) *
From The Planetary Society Blog:
"The interior of that south polar basin sure looks weird. All around the central peak are chevron-shaped ridgy features that bring to mind Miranda -- which, by the way, is very similar in size to Vesta."


Yeah...I guess I can see that. To me (again, not a geologist), it just all looks like grooves similar to those on other small bodies like Phobos and Lutetia.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stefan
post Jul 19 2011, 01:22 PM
Post #38


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 16-November 06
Member No.: 1364



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jul 18 2011, 09:21 PM) *
OK this is making me absolutely crazy. Another image release (yay!) but as with all the previous image releases the reported scale is wrong. They keep reporting the pixel scale for the original, unenlarged image, and then they post an image that has been enlarged (badly) by some non-integer factor and fail to divide the pixel scale by whatever their enlargement factor was.


The last few images were enlarged by an integer factor. Did you find something wrong with how they were enlarged?

While the quoted pixel scale is indeed not valid for the enlarged image, it is the relevant number for knowing the smallest detail that can be resolved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 19 2011, 01:31 PM
Post #39


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Drkskywxlt @ Jul 19 2011, 07:37 AM) *
...it just all looks like grooves...
All groves are not alike. There are straight grooves, sinuous groves, grooves with right angles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stefan
post Jul 19 2011, 01:36 PM
Post #40


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 16-November 06
Member No.: 1364



QUOTE (punkboi @ Jul 19 2011, 12:14 AM) *
Congrats to the Dawn team for a successful orbit insertion! Now looking forward to a color image of Vesta... smile.gif


There is a false color image on the MPS Dawn page (click the latest headline).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Jul 19 2011, 02:00 PM
Post #41


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



The focus is getting better.
The Clangers definetly live there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Steve G
post Jul 19 2011, 02:08 PM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 289
Joined: 29-December 05
From: Ottawa, ON
Member No.: 624



The south polar crater is, by appearances, a flat slice right across the south pole. However, gravity is always pulling towards the center of the body. So on the outer limits of this flat massive basin, it is gravitationally speaking, an up hill slope. This would naturally draw the loose surface material towards the center of the crater, and perhaps create the cracks and rifts, would it not?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorimancer
post Jul 19 2011, 02:37 PM
Post #43


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 656
Joined: 20-April 05
From: League City, Texas
Member No.: 285



Was arrival facing the south polar crater planned, or a coincidence of orbital mechanics and intent to enter a polar orbit? I understand that it is a target of interest, just wondering about the extent of the planning process in that regard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Jul 19 2011, 03:03 PM
Post #44


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



Coordinated views of the normal and contrast-enhanced IR composite of 4 Vesta
(lineup is approximate) note the 4-pack of craters to the N in both images.

Attached Image


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 19 2011, 03:11 PM
Post #45


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10145
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Nice one, Mike.

The orange spot in the false color view coincides with the darker spot seen in distant views, including the 'crater with tails' as someone described it, on the edge of the smooth patch we saw a while ago.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

29 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 06:46 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.