IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Mission To 700 AU, Discussion of options for sending a probe to 700 AU
qraal
post May 9 2016, 09:18 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 13-February 06
From: Brisbane, Australia
Member No.: 679



Speaking of Mike Brown and his planets, if the proposed Planet IX is confirmed, then it's likely to be about 700 AU away. That's a 200 year journey at "Voyager" speed (~3.5 AU/year), so we'll need to go significantly faster.

For historical precedent there's the Thousand AU mission design from the late 1980s, which used a SNAP powered ion drive to push a probe to ~20 AU/year. Waiting 50 years for major data return seems excessive, so I'd think a 20 year max travel time, and preferably a 10 year travel time, should be in the minimum specifications.

The main propulsion options IMO are an extreme Oberth Maneuver, with a very high thrust system at perihelion; a high performance Solar-Sail; an E-Sail, and - a bit more speculative - a laser-push by the proposed Starshot Array.

Anything missing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
nprev
post May 10 2016, 05:09 AM
Post #2


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



MOD NOTE: Please review and be mindful of rule 1.9 before posting in this topic.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
qraal
post May 10 2016, 08:06 AM
Post #3


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 13-February 06
From: Brisbane, Australia
Member No.: 679



To review:

1.9 Other subjects that are banned here include: Pluto's planethood; conspiracy theories; sci-fi engineering; "new physics"; pseudoscience.

...which hopefully we can keep this topic to real near-term engineering options.

QUOTE (nprev @ May 10 2016, 04:09 PM) *
MOD NOTE: Please review and be mindful of rule 1.9 before posting in this topic.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post May 10 2016, 01:36 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (qraal @ May 10 2016, 09:06 AM) *
To review:

1.9 Other subjects that are banned here include: Pluto's planethood; conspiracy theories; sci-fi engineering; "new physics"; pseudoscience.

...which hopefully we can keep this topic to real near-term engineering options.


And to put a bookmark about current engineering:

Lasers- current US Navy laser is solid state 30kW (XN-1 LaWS on USS Ponce),
contracts are out to develop 150kW versions to be aircraft based.

Railguns -current US Navy guns fire 23 pound rounds at mach 7, (escape velocity at earth's surface is around mach 33)
Sea trials are supposed to start aboard USNS Millinocket.


File:Laser Weapon System aboard USS Ponce (AFSB(I)-15) in November 2014 (05).JPG
File:One of two electromagnetic railgun prototypes on display aboard joint high speed vessel USS Millinocket (JHSV 3) in port at Naval Base San Diego on July 8, 2014. US Navy photo.

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post May 10 2016, 04:11 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



Here's a proposal for a solar sail craft that would attain a velocity of 400 km/s, which is 1 AU every 4 days. That could reach a distance of 1,000 AU in about thirty years. That would provide the necessary specs for this and many other objectives.

The strategy is to put a spacecraft into an orbit that brings it close to the Sun, then open the solar sails at that time. I don't know if the specifics are in order, but the general principles seem sound. It might be the cheapest way to achieve a certain range of velocities.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0701073.pdf
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Dec 31 2017, 08:10 PM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (JRehling @ May 10 2016, 04:11 PM) *
Here's a proposal for a solar sail craft that would attain a velocity of 400 km/s, which is 1 AU every 4 days. That could reach a distance of 1,000 AU in about thirty years. That would provide the necessary specs for this and many other objectives.

The strategy is to put a spacecraft into an orbit that brings it close to the Sun, then open the solar sails at that time. I don't know if the specifics are in order, but the general principles seem sound. It might be the cheapest way to achieve a certain range of velocities.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0701073.pdf


Hey, there may be a new "best actual engineering demonstration" for sails.

The "plasma magnet sail"

It's a magnetic sail that traps the solar wind using current induced in solar plasma instead of current in a solid superconducting ring.

That's roughly analagous to the advance in electric generation which occured when designs switched from "magneto" with a rotating iron bar magnet
to the "dynamo" where the magnetic field is created by current flowing through field coils.

Propbably the most interesting sail proposal I've ever seen -


Combined that with the recent work on Magneto Aeroshell Braking for stopping.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/magnetoshell-a...-space-orbiters You might not need a heavy rentry shield and meters-wide parachute, if you've got a tunable magnetic field...


Combine the two, and suddenly you've got some extremely interesting real entineering "electromagnetic propulsion" possibilites.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 01:57 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.