IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Paper: Spectral Evidence for Liquid Water on Mars, LPSC 2011, Renno and Mehta
marsbug
post Apr 6 2011, 08:14 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



HiRISE strikes again on the looking for water front: LPSC 2011, spectral evidence for liquid water on Mars.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Drkskywxlt
post Apr 21 2011, 03:16 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



QUOTE (marsbug @ Apr 6 2011, 03:14 PM) *
HiRISE strikes again on the looking for water front: LPSC 2011, spectral evidence for liquid water on Mars.


Alfred McEwan stood up during that talk to specifically say that he, speaking for the HIRISE team, does NOT agree with their conclusions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
schaffman
post Apr 22 2011, 01:17 PM
Post #3


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 6-March 10
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 5246



QUOTE (Drkskywxlt @ Apr 21 2011, 11:16 AM) *
Alfred McEwan stood up during that talk to specifically say that he, speaking for the HIRISE team, does NOT agree with their conclusions.


One thing the abstract doesn't overtly mention is that the area showing the purported location of the spectral signals for brines (Fig. 2) is located in the crater Richardson, near the south pole. The abstract just says "polar region." The discussion of the Phoenix results at the beginning leads one to conclude the authors are talking about the north polar region. The elevations around Richardson crater are about 1 km above datum in contrast to the several km below datum for the north polar region. It seems to me that the lower atmospheric pressures in the south polar regions make these locations a less likely place for liquid brines than in the north. No?

Tom
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drkskywxlt
post Apr 22 2011, 01:53 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



QUOTE (schaffman @ Apr 22 2011, 08:17 AM) *
It seems to me that the lower atmospheric pressures in the south polar regions make these locations a less likely place for liquid brines than in the north. No?

Tom


Perhaps...does the salt in the water also allow it to stay liquid at low pressures as it lowers the freezing point? For pure water that's certainly true.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
schaffman
post Apr 22 2011, 03:47 PM
Post #5


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 6-March 10
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 5246



QUOTE (Drkskywxlt @ Apr 22 2011, 09:53 AM) *
Perhaps...does the salt in the water also allow it to stay liquid at low pressures as it lowers the freezing point? For pure water that's certainly true.


I think adding salts decreases the vapor pressure of pure water, which increases its boiling temperature. The water boils when its vapor pressure exceeds atmospheric pressure. So, briny liquids should also be more stable at higher elevations on Mars than pure water, all else being equal. Still, I’d expect the stability field of the same liquid to be wider at lower elevations, making its presence more likely in the low elevation north than the south. Aslo the presence of abundant water ice is better documented for the north polar region.

As an additional note, the authors’ Fig. 2 is from images taken in the southern spring (Ls 210°–220°) when the seasonal CO2 cap is rapidly sublimating. I think CO2 can interfere with the spectral signature of water. (It’s interesting that CO2 ice is not included in their Fig. 1 for comparison.)

All in all, based on this layman’s opinion, McEwen is right to be skeptical.

Tom
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 12:24 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.