IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

15 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Along the base of Vera Rubin Ridge, (Sites 64-65, Sols 1726-1812, Jun 14-Sep 11 2017)
PaulH51
post Aug 15 2017, 01:25 PM
Post #136


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



The best I could pull out of MS ICE. L-NavCam 1786. Midnight Planets reports the point to point drive as ~16.0m NE (39º)
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Aug 15 2017, 02:19 PM
Post #137


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1785.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Aug 15 2017, 04:54 PM
Post #138


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



and the view on Sol 1786.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 15 2017, 06:37 PM
Post #139


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Thanks, Jan and Paul. This is Jan's panorama in circular form. The drive probably terminated as the wheels were negotiating a rocky mound here. It's actually very surprising that this doesn't happen more often!

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Aug 15 2017, 07:13 PM
Post #140


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Aug 15 2017, 11:37 AM) *
...
It's actually very surprising that this doesn't happen more often!


We try to avoid these things. Whenever the surface topography is this extreme, the reconstructed surface has "holes" due to occlusions which prevents us from accurately simulating attitude and suspension values during a drive. Sometimes we have no choice, we have to drive through holes (holy drives?) and we spend considerable amount of time to decide which holes to visit. End of drive positions are chosen also to maximize visibility and reduce occlusions in the intended drive direction.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Aug 16 2017, 10:10 AM
Post #141


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (RoverDriver @ Aug 16 2017, 03:13 AM) *
We try to avoid these things....
Paolo

Thanks for the insight Paolo, much appreciated smile.gif

Looks like they captured the culprit in this sol 1787 mid-drive NavCam image looking back to where yestersols drive halted. Appears to be a loose block that was moved by the rover's wheels.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Aug 16 2017, 10:35 AM
Post #142


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



The roughly assembled L-NavCam partial pan using MS ICE that may help pinpoint the location until the full version is posted here. As usual, feel free to delete this post once full pan is posted.
Attached Image


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Aug 16 2017, 04:48 PM
Post #143


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 976
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Aug 16 2017, 02:10 AM) *
...
Looks like they captured the culprit in this sol 1787 mid-drive NavCam image looking back to where yestersols drive halted. Appears to be a loose block that was moved by the rover's wheels.
...


What happened is that the newly developed traction control software interpreted the local topography as a "wheelie" (*) and tried to correct it but failed to do so. While the available torque is Bugatti-Veyron class (really!), it still cannot change Mars topography.

Paolo
(*) wheelies on Mars happen when either the mid or rear wheels are raised from the surface due to difference in traction. While driving forwards, if the rear wheel has more traction than the front, the mid wheel can be raised. Vice-versa, while driving backwards if the front wheels have more traction that the mid, the rear wheels can come up. Keeping all wheels on the surface increases overall traction and reduces stress on the wheels and rover planners.


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Aug 16 2017, 07:24 PM
Post #144


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1787.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Aug 17 2017, 06:53 PM
Post #145


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1788.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Aug 17 2017, 10:41 PM
Post #146


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



here are a couple corsseye views of m34/m100 pairs on sol1782 and sol1787
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Aug 20 2017, 12:03 PM
Post #147


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Partial RMI mosaic (sharpened) of VRR, acquired on sol 1790.
Sadly one of the images in the sequence had data drop out, so MS ICE could not be convinced to assemble all of the available images.
Even though incomplete, it gives us a fairly good look at the stratigraphy of this section of the ridge... If they resend the errant frame I'll try to assemble the complete mosaic. smile.gif
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 21 2017, 06:11 PM
Post #148


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Jan's panorama for sol 1788 in circular form.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Aug 21 2017, 08:39 PM
Post #149


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 1792.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Aug 21 2017, 09:13 PM
Post #150


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



some aolean art sol1790
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

15 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 03:40 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.