MSL scientific results |
MSL scientific results |
Sep 29 2013, 07:30 AM
Post
#46
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 270 Joined: 29-December 04 From: NLA0: Member No.: 133 |
Full papers now up on the JPL site:
Analysis of Surface Materials by the Curiosity Mars Rover. Soil Diversity and Hydration as Observed by ChemCam at Gale Crater, Mars. X-Ray Diffraction Results from Mars Science Laboratory: Mineralogy of Rocknest at Gale Crater. Volatile, Isotope, and Organic Analysis of Martian Fines with the Mars Curiosity Rover. The Petrochemistry of Jake_M: A Martian Mugearite. Curiosity at Gale Crater, Mars: Characterization and Analysis of the Rocknest Sand Shadow. ADMIN: Links edited to include titles of papers. -------------------- PDP, VAX and Alpha fanatic ; HP-Compaq is the Satan! ; Let us pray daily while facing Maynard! ; Life starts at 150 km/h ;
|
|
|
Nov 13 2013, 09:20 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 94 Joined: 11-August 12 Member No.: 6536 |
AGU abstracts are now available online here. (Link edited and fixed. Thanks Phil!)
There's a lot there. For instance: "Sedimentary rocks of the YBF [Yellowknife Bay Formation] preserve a remarkable diversity of diagenetic textural features. These features can be roughly subdivided into at least two phases of activity: (1) formation of early concretions, voids, and internally banded ridges, potentially associated with a set of redox reactions that may have produced gases of, as yet, unknown character, and (2) later precipitation of Ca-sulfate (anhydrite, bassanite, and perhaps gypsum) in veins and in early diagenetic voids that are cross-cut by veins." "Title: Raised Ridges in the Sheepbed Member as Evidence for Early Subaqueous Diagenesis at Yellowknife Bay Spatially restricted clusters of erosion-resistant, ridged fracture fills have been found throughout the fine-grained clay-rich Sheepbed member of the Yellowknife Bay Formation ... these are interpreted as early diagenetic synaeresis cracks, likely formed by gas expansion... the fracture-filling also occurred subaqueously, in the phreatic zone, and was likely a very early diagenetic process" "TITLE: The Mineralogical and Chemical Case for Habitability at Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars ...The presence of Fe and S in both reduced and oxidized states represents chemical disequilibria that could have been utilized ...Saponitization of olivine (a process analogous to serpentinization) could have produced H2 in situ. Indeed, early diagenetic hollow nodules (“minibowls”) present in the Cumberland mudstone are interpreted by some as forming when gas bubbles accumulated in the unconsolidated mudstone... A rough estimate of the minimum duration of the lacustrine environment is provided by the minimum thickness of the Sheepbed member. Given 1.5 meters, and applying a mean sediment accumulation rate for lacustrine strata of 1 m/1000 yrs yields a duration of 1,500 years. If the aqueous environments represented by overlying strata are considered, such as Gillespie Lake and Shaler, then this duration increases." And: "A potential analog for the Sheepbed smectite is ‘griffithite,’ a variety of trioctahedral smectite in altered basalt of the Topanga formation, Griffith Park, Los Angeles." I love the irony of sending Curiosity all the way from Pasadena to Gale Crater, only to find the same rocks as are present a short drive away in Griffith Park. |
|
|
Nov 13 2013, 09:40 PM
Post
#48
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10157 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Use this link - Don1's seems to be tangled up with his logon info so it rejects direct access.
http://fallmeeting.agu.org/2013/scientific-program-2/ Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 05:54 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2084 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
RAD telecon starting soon:
http://www.nasa.gov/news/media/newsaudio/i...ml#.UqYDVOKp6Fh |
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 09:06 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 219 Joined: 14-November 11 From: Washington, DC Member No.: 6237 |
Well, I missed the telecon, but if this is the press release to go with it there was a lot more that just RAD!
NASA Rover Results Include First Age Measurement on Mars and Help for Human Exploration http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/recent has the 6 papers under today's date. (EDIT: changed 1st link to point to JPL page instead of nasa.gov; EDIT2: 1st link fixed) |
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 09:51 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
The first link contains a trailing %22; it should be
NASA Rover Results Include First Age Measurement on Mars and Help for Human Exploration |
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 11:03 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Thanks for those links. Rock dating by a robotic probe is a big landmark in solar system exploration. The better the robots get the less need there is for sample return.
|
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 11:44 PM
Post
#53
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 444 Joined: 1-July 05 From: New York City Member No.: 424 |
This is exciting. I've noticed some stories in the last couple of years about rock dating instruments under development for future missions, e.g. here, and especially here.
But as the middle ages roll on, one starts to curb his enthusiasm about instruments in development for hypothetical future missions. It's an unexpected treat that currently roving hardware can do this. TTT |
|
|
Dec 10 2013, 12:03 AM
Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
I've been hoping that the K-Ar method could work without been anticipated before landing. So this is a really exciting success. (Btw.: It has been discussed at UMSF years ago.)
Narrowing down locations of low cumulative radiation exposure could result in even more exciting results; can't wait for the first SAM analysis of the next drill tailings (at WP4). The MSR question is certainly highly controverse (rule 1.2?). |
|
|
Dec 11 2013, 11:31 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
What amazes me is that the particles that constitute the mudstone are still so big that a negligible amout of argon has escaped from their sufaces, allowing a crystallisation date to be derived for the progenitor rock. I would have expected some of that argon to have got out somehow, with all the physical and chemical processes those grains have undergone. How small do particles have to be before we can't do this? Can we get a crystallisation age for the material that forms Martian dust?
|
|
|
Dec 12 2013, 01:16 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
K-Ar dating:
QUOTE When K-40 decays to Ar-40 (Argon), the atom typically remains trapped within the lattice because it is larger than the spaces between the other atoms in a mineral crystal. Based on this, you can well go down to the nanoscale, unless the surface doesn't get too large in comparison to the volume. Things get a little more complicated, whenever the crystal lattice is destroyed, but the argon can't escape, and part of it is trapped again in new crystals. The main uncertainty in the recent measurements seems to not have been caused by the argon, but by the limited accuracy of the amount of potassium. Single interstellar dustgrains have been analysed. I'm unaware of K-Ar dating of dust. |
|
|
Jan 4 2014, 06:39 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Links to the six December 9 papers, abstracts and full text.
You can also get there via Emily's post, but it's more direct this way. |
|
|
Jun 26 2014, 03:21 AM
Post
#58
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 87 Joined: 17-May 08 Member No.: 4114 |
Passive ChemCam observations have come up a few times. It appears there is a recent paper on this
ChemCam passive reflectance spectroscopy of surface materials at the Curiosity landing site, Mars (paywall, but googling the title should find you a PDF on the chemcam site) The ChemCam publications page has a bunch more recent papers and preprints. |
|
|
Jul 18 2014, 07:18 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
Researcher claim MSL images show "Earth like soils" suggestive of more benign conditions on Mars in the ancient past.
Univ of Oregon media relations page. |
|
|
Jul 15 2015, 05:44 PM
Post
#60
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 1-March 11 From: Houston, USA Member No.: 5860 |
Published evidence for more differentiated igneous rocks:
Date: July 14, 2015 Source: DOE/Los Alamos National Laboratory Summary: The ChemCam laser instrument on NASA's Curiosity rover has turned its beam onto some unusually light-colored rocks on Mars, and the results are surprisingly similar to Earth's granitic continental crust rocks. This is the first discovery of a potential 'continental crust' on Mars. DOE/Los Alamos National Laboratory. "Curiosity rover finds evidence of Mars' primitive continental crust: ChemCam instrument shows ancient rock much like Earth's." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150714142051.htm (accessed July 15, 2015). |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th May 2024 - 06:06 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |