IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Origin of Phobos and Deimos, Where did these guys come from?
djellison
post Mar 27 2013, 08:38 PM
Post #46


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Chmee @ Mar 27 2013, 09:46 AM) *
I would think gravitational disturbances with such low masses would be very minor at that distance...


Extrapolate a tiny tiny force, over millions and millions of years.

What do you get? A big difference.

You even need to include things like solar pressure etc etc. Very long period orbital extrapolation is fraught with nature's subtle influence, much of which is very hard to simulate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 27 2013, 08:41 PM
Post #47


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10128
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The real problem here is that these kinds of orbital extrapolations only work for limited periods. The system becomes chaotic especially near any resonances, and as Doug pointed out there could have been other short-lived chunks which would make it even more chaotic. Even now we can't predict precisely where the two moons will be from one decade to the next - the MSL Mastcam images on about sol 42 showed the moons a bit off where they were expected (there's an LPSC abstract on it somewhere). So we can't possibly extrapolate backwards very far.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chmee
post Apr 28 2013, 07:18 PM
Post #48


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 206



In the debate over the origin of Phobos and Deimos, it looks like several recent papers have been published supporting the 'giant impactor' theory. Here are the abstracts to a couple very interesting papers on this subject:

"Are Phobos and Deimos the result of a giant impact?" - Robert A. Craddock Icarus Volume 211, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 1150–1161

"On the formation of the martian moons from a circum-martian accretion disk" Pascal Rosenblatt Icarus Volume 221, Issue 2, November–December 2012, Pages 806–815

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pandaneko
post Jun 10 2015, 09:44 AM
Post #49


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 817
Joined: 17-April 10
From: Kamakura, Japan
Member No.: 5323



I am not too sure if this is to be called a follow-on to the demise of Nozomi.

Today's Asahi newspaper here in Japan talks about JAXA sending a sample
return mission to one of the Martian satellites. What follows is my translation.

JAXA reported to the Space Activities Commision on 9 June 2015 (yesterday)
that they woud like to launch a sample return mission to one of the Martian
satellites during the early part of 2020's. SAC accepted it.

The proposal is based on JAXA's ISAS's judgement that given Hayabusa experience and
the expected experience from the sample return mission proposed for 2019 from
the Moon the sample return mission form a Martian satellite is within the capability
of ISAS.

This is part of the next 10 year's space programme agreed by the government
in January this year that three medium sized projects will be conducted
during the next 10 years.

P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Sep 11 2015, 04:50 PM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1621
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



This will be among the topics covered in this dedicated NASA seminar series on Phobos and Deimos, beginning September 14th. These can be seen live or via archive.

http://sservi.nasa.gov/event/planetary-evo...bos-and-deimos/


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Nov 11 2015, 03:34 AM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2073
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/phobos-is-falling-apart

Has the mystery of the grooves finally been solved once and for all?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 11 2015, 04:23 AM
Post #52


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10128
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Not really, we just have another suggested explanation. The suggestion that Triton is similar is absurd.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chmee
post Jul 5 2016, 04:13 PM
Post #53


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 206



New paper out in Scientific American that lends weight to the collision theory for the origin of Phobos and Deimos.
Such a large collision would also potential explain the Northern flatlands as the remnants of a vast crater from the collision:

http://gizmodo.com/a-badass-new-theory-on-...oons-1783059254
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 6 2016, 05:49 AM
Post #54


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



There are sufficient craters on Mars large enough to have ejected dust and rubble beyond the Roche limit where it would have accreted to form the two poorly cohesive moons. A single massive impact forming a large moon with an atypical degrading orbit is not required although is of course a possibility. Why Phobos, though tidal locked is orbiting faster than Mars' rotation and thus having a degrading orbit is a question although.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 6 2016, 06:04 AM
Post #55


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Tidal locking itself is not too surprising, esp. if Phobos' internal mass distribution isn't very symmetric. However, in light of this new hypothesis, I wonder if Phobos' orbital history can be traced backwards to approximate the age of the purported impact event that created it & perhaps identify a candidate crater. Considering that it will hit Mars in 50 million years or less maybe Phobos hasn't existed for very long at all, geologically speaking...hundreds of millions instead of billions of years.

If that admittedly wild speculation is correct, then Deimos may have arisen from a different impact entirely.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 6 2016, 03:42 PM
Post #56


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10128
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



" I wonder if Phobos' orbital history can be traced backwards to approximate the age of the purported impact event that created it & perhaps identify a candidate crater."

No. The system is far too chaotic and unpredictable for that. Among other factors, mass redistribution via volcanism and polar volatiles cycling would alter the gravity field of Mars enough to introduce small orbital changes we can't model. Also the suggested existence of other moons in the past makes for interactions which can't be modelled.

Also,"There are sufficient craters on Mars large enough" - no, there are not lots of craters big enough, only a few huge basins, and they are very old. Craters like Lyot or Lowell produce lots of ejecta, but only a small fraction of it could end up in a debris ring (if it's even possible for impacts that size). For those craters we might look at sources of SNC meteorites, not moons.

Another point to consider. Phobos and Deimos are in orbits very close to the equator. But the obliquity of the axis of Mars swings wildly between about 0 and 60 degrees - where ours varies very little. So either the present low inclination orbits are a coincidence or the orbit planes also vary significantly over relatively short periods.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jul 6 2016, 08:20 PM
Post #57


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (nprev @ Jul 6 2016, 07:04 AM) *
Considering that it will hit Mars in 50 million years or less maybe Phobos hasn't existed for very long at all, geologically speaking...hundreds of millions instead of billions of years.

If that admittedly wild speculation is correct, then Deimos may have arisen from a different impact entirely.


That's coming close to my idea that both Phobos and Deimos are remnants of a single geosynchronous moon. The big ancient impact could have resulted in a single geosynchronous moon (like Charon) which was shattered by a later and smaller collision, leaving some of the debris spiralling in and some spiralling out - as we see today.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Jul 6 2016, 08:49 PM
Post #58


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 909
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



You all seem to have missed a very recent paper: Nature Geoscience (2016) doi:10.1038/ngeo2742 Behind paywall.

Abstract: Phobos and Deimos, the two small satellites of Mars, are thought either to be asteroids captured by the planet or to have formed in a disc of debris surrounding Mars following a giant impact1, 2, 3, 4. Both scenarios, however, have been unable to account for the current Mars system1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7. Here we use numerical simulations to suggest that Phobos and Deimos accreted from the outer portion of a debris disc formed after a giant impact on Mars. In our simulations, larger moons form from material in the denser inner disc and migrate outwards due to gravitational interactions with the disc. The resulting orbital resonances spread outwards and gather dispersed outer disc debris, facilitating accretion into two satellites of sizes similar to Phobos and Deimos. The larger inner moons fall back to Mars after about 5 million years due to the tidal pull of the planet, after which the two outer satellites evolve into Phobos- and Deimos-like orbits. The proposed scenario can explain why Mars has two small satellites instead of one large moon. Our model predicts that Phobos and Deimos are composed of a mixture of material from Mars and the impactor.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 6 2016, 11:28 PM
Post #59


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 6 2016, 04:42 PM) *
"..... no, there are not lots of craters big enough, only a few huge basins, and they are very old".


These are what I was alluding to. Isidis, Hellas, Argyre, possibly the older Utopia impact; sufficient to provide accretion material without having to invoke an earlier, massive collision.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jul 6 2016, 11:42 PM
Post #60


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



If the Nature Geoscience article is accurate, then what we ought to look for, perhaps, would be the impacts of the two larger moons that their theory predicts spiraled in and impacted Mars.

Two of the best candidate sites for such impacts, I would think, are Hellas and Argyre. Interestingly, if these are impacts from the two moons predicted by the above-mentioned theory, and if those moons, like Phobos and Deimos, were in low-inclination orbits, then at the time of the impacts Mars itself had different rotational poles, with a lot of what is now the southern hemisphere sitting along the equator. Considering it has been theorized that Mars did have a significant rotational pole shift after the huge piles of Tharsis lavas all got built up on one side of the planet, the whole thing re-orienting to place the greatest mass of the Tharsis bulge along the equator, this could account for seeming high-inclination impacts which may actually have been from low-inclination moons -- it was the surface of Mars that changed in inclination, so to speak, rather than the moons' orbits.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 07:39 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.