Voyager Question.... |
Voyager Question.... |
Mar 24 2009, 01:20 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
I am trying to figure out Voyager's NAC resolution at 251,000 km, 435,000 km, and 708,000 km. I have always calculated this in the past, but my numbers seem wrong and I am nervous...
-------------------- |
|
|
Mar 24 2009, 03:11 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
I understand this kind of paranoia!
The Voyager NAC pixel FOV is 0.000530 degrees (source: Voyager 1 NAC instrument description) 0.000530 degrees = 0.00925 millradians 251,000 km x 0.00925 millradians = 2.32 km/pixel 435,000 km x 0.00925 millradians = 4.02 km/pixel 708,000 km x 0.00925 millradians = 6.55 km/pixel --Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Mar 24 2009, 09:39 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
Thanks - That's what I thought, but 2.32 seemed too high and was making me nervous - I have a tendency to make silly mistakes with things like this and was having a pre-LPSC panic moment - thanks!
Calculations with lots of zeros scare me. My calculus professor used to have great laughs showing my work on the overhead projector (I felt cool!). He claimed I was the only student he ever had who could do the calculus with ease but routinely screwed up the arithmetic! I always leave out, add or transpose a number somewhere. -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 24 2009, 11:54 PM
Post
#4
|
||
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
To complicate matters a bit, there is significant geometric distortion in the Voyager images so the pixel scale really isn't completely uniform across the image. Once the images have been geometrically corrected they look like this:
This is a Voyager 1 image of Rhea from the calibrated and geometrically corrected Voyager volumes at the PDS Rings Node. I don't think this is usually taken into account when the resolution is specified and the effect is small. Where the image above is widest (top/bottom), the FOV ~0.438 degrees if you omit the black 'frame' around the image and 0.424 degrees near the center because the image edge is 'curved'. |
|
|
||
Mar 25 2009, 04:52 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
Well, for this purpose, I simply needed a ballpark number. But yes, for mapping, that is important. -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 06:00 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |