A [nav]cam pointed straight down, (for visual odometry) |
A [nav]cam pointed straight down, (for visual odometry) |
Apr 4 2009, 12:41 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
A brief mention of the time it takes for visual odometry in the Spirit route thread got me thinking off on digital signal processing tangents--
The optical mouse you're using right now has no issues with visual odometry, unless you use it on too plain a surface, and the basic principle is a camera taking lots of tiny photos of the surface connected to a DSP. Have any rover technologies looked at analogous techniques for really precise odometry? Or perhaps navigation is a better term than odometry because it can handle arbitrary vectors. Is it too tough to do this with an eyeball farther from the ground? Without a light source that can flatten the light for a larger area? Isn't this easier than doing odometry with cameras looking any other direction? Does the rover visual odometry use lots of successive photos of the most immediate objects, or does it try to use big objects farther away as waypoints? |
|
|
Apr 4 2009, 02:33 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 236 Joined: 5-June 08 From: Udon Thani Member No.: 4185 |
Have any rover technologies looked at analogous techniques for really precise odometry? Or perhaps navigation is a better term than odometry because it can handle arbitrary vectors. Is it too tough to do this with an eyeball farther from the ground? Without a light source that can flatten the light for a larger area? Isn't this easier than doing odometry with cameras looking any other direction? The old Lunochods just carried a 9th (unpowered) wheel center aft which was used to measure odometry, that's probably the most simple solution although offcourse you will have to correct for drag, etc, etc. I don't think you will need a camera, you can use a small laserbeam, pointing down, exactly similar to the technique an optical mouse is using, that will give you very exact data, but like everything else it will have a price in extra weight, extra complexity, and extra costs. We can dream up a 'perfect' rover but nobody will have the budget to pay for it... |
|
|
Apr 4 2009, 02:51 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
MARDI might be up for this job on MSL if I understand correctly.
QUOTE Once on the ground images will cover an area about 1 by 0.75 m across at a resolution of about 1.5 mm per pixel pair. Though I don't know if any plans exist for such use once landed. EDIT - Oops! Shoulda read the whole thing here: QUOTE Although not an original requirement or objective of the investigation, additional images may be taken during rover traverses for visual odometry and geologic mapping. Yeeeehaw! -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Apr 4 2009, 03:58 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
That's an interesting idea, Steve.
... the whole thing here:... I suppose the Swiss Army knife in the image on that page may have been meant to emphasize the instrument's myriad potential uses.
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Apr 4 2009, 04:58 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Neat! Thanks, lyford. If you've got the framerate (they do) and the processing power, I'd imagine it'd be harder to find a better direction to point for visual odometry.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 04:49 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |