IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Basaltic Sediments, rethinking Mars - again?
djellison
post Dec 9 2014, 10:46 PM
Post #61


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (serpens @ Dec 9 2014, 02:30 PM) *
Personally I feel that a dab of artistic licence to show a higher, less eroded crater rim and ejecta field would have provided a better feel for what it would have looked like.


Me to. But given the time I had to make it - that was never gonna happen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Dec 10 2014, 10:39 AM
Post #62


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



QUOTE (serpens @ Dec 9 2014, 11:30 PM) *
... Given the position in relation to Mount Sharp a late stage onlap or downlap would seem more logical. The same logic would apply to the Murray Formation.

It should be possible to discriminate the two hypotheses by their predictions, how the inclination of cross-bedded or deltaic layers are oriented.
They observed (as a key observation) roughly southward oriented inclinations, so it's reasonable to start with testing, whether this will hold during future observations.

Mount Sharp downlap should incline layers away from Mt. Sharp, in general.

Mt. Sharp downlap layers might have been ontop of the base layers, and eroded away (in a mostly aeolian way) by now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 12:00 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.