IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Theory about Atlas morphology
SigurRosFan
post Aug 14 2007, 10:00 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



Abstract:

On June 12, 2007 the Cassini probe sent the images of a small moon of Saturn called Atlas which is located between the ring A and the small ring R/2004 S 1. These images have shown that the Atlas morphology is very different from other moons of similar dimensions. In the present article we propose a reasonable theory, to that we denominated "flying dune", that explains its morphologic characteristics from its magnitudes like mass, diameters and orbital radius, as well as its orbital position and the interpretation of the images caught by the Cassini probe.

- Theory about Atlas morphology


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Aug 14 2007, 01:34 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Good grief sad.gif Well, at least I know what all my emails will be about today...


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Aug 14 2007, 01:51 PM
Post #3


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



is this submitted to any journal? I can't see it anywhere...

mmmm excel plots smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Aug 14 2007, 02:06 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Umm... the sheer number of typos and plain bad english put me off from reading it through, but the issue I find disturbing is it uses the raw image data that was not yet archived at the PDS. Very unfair to the imaging team. This classifies as an attempted "scoop".


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Aug 14 2007, 02:32 PM
Post #5


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



The text is pretty comical. And he does need to keep his hands off those raw JPEGs -- most of what he needs is in the PDS anyway, it's totally unnecessary. But I gotta hand it to him for coming up with the imaginative "flying dune" descriptor.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Aug 14 2007, 08:22 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Article originated from discussion in an astronomy forum:

QUOTE
The model presented here arose as result of the different opinions expressed in an astronomy forum on the web page: www.sondasespaciales.com.

The Internet forums are an excellent way to implement the technique of “brainstorming” that so good results offers in the management companies to solve complex problems. For that reason I want to thank to each and every one of which they were there, in the thread Atlas, sin duda un nuevo misterio, first its ideas and later its aid, support and spirit so that this model got to take shape in the present article.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rob Pinnegar
post Aug 15 2007, 02:15 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 2-July 05
From: Calgary, Alberta
Member No.: 426



QUOTE (ugordan @ Aug 14 2007, 08:06 AM) *
This classifies as an attempted "scoop".

That's possible, but it's just as likely that he simply doesn't know any better.

As regards the poor English, well, it's a bit too easy to criticize people from non-English-speaking countries for this kind of thing. You have to cut them some slack; they've got a huge disadvantage here, compared with native English speakers.

A better idea is to concentrate on the science... which, in this case, *isn't* impressive. The first half reads like a high-school science project. I don't care much for the gravity modelling, either.

This isn't going to make it through review, not at any journal with a positive impact factor.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 10:16 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.