IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

67 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Extricating Spirit, Digging out from Troy
nprev
post Nov 12 2009, 09:06 PM
Post #76


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Stories hitting Google News now; here's the Associated Press release, which usually serves as the root for derivative articles.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Nov 12 2009, 09:27 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE
Spirit landed on Mars with six working wheels but soon lost movement in its right front wheel.

Typical media getting it wrong whenever they can.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Nov 12 2009, 09:32 PM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Nasa comment regarding DM1 picture of today release was not much better (ok, probaly tiping mistakes)
"The red line tracks the 18.8 kilometers (11.7 miles) that NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity traveled from where it landed in January 2004 to its position 2,955 Martian days, or sols, later, on Nov. 4, 2009. The rover landed inside Eagle Crater and spent about half of its first year examining layers inside Victoria Crater before embarking on a long trek to the larger Victoria Crater, which is explored for two years."


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Nov 13 2009, 01:27 AM
Post #79


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Now that we have these great maps of Scamander Crater, I went back and had a look for it in some old anaglyphs posted on this forum. And bingo: there, in Ant's sol 1869 pancam anaglyph mosaic from this post, it is. Here's a crop with Scamander circled in white. Also I've circled in black the "rock garden" where we're currently sitting, with one side hanging over into the crater.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Keatah
post Nov 13 2009, 03:00 AM
Post #80


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 13-June 08
Member No.: 4206



Why not flap the solar panels and fly away??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Nov 13 2009, 04:05 AM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



QUOTE (Keatah @ Nov 12 2009, 07:00 PM) *
Why not flap the solar panels and fly away??

Feel free. :-)

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Nov 13 2009, 04:19 AM
Post #82


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



I'm wondering if the dark rectangle indicated by the arrow is the depression in Spirit's underbelly that they are concerned may catch on Belly Rock's tip. The forward drive, toward us as we view this image, is supposed to eliminate this possibility.
Attached Image

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mer/news...el20091110.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 13 2009, 04:37 AM
Post #83


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Not to be denser than usual, but is anyone else getting terribly confused by the forward/back distinctions when talking about the extraction?

I propose establishing four standard reference terms: "rover-front", "rover-back", "rover-left", and "rover-right". Rover-front is the normal lead end of the vehicle where the IDD is mounted, and rover-back is obvious. Rover-left is the left side of the vehicle as viewed from above referenced to rover-front. Examples of useage: "Today Spirit moved 2m rover-back", "This MI image has rover-front facing the point of view", "Spirit experienced some slight rover-left slippage during today's drive".

Just a proposal, and in all probability there's already a perfectly good reference system that I'm not aware of.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Nov 13 2009, 05:24 AM
Post #84


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



nprev, I know what you mean, but inevitably someone will abbreviate rover-front to RF and then were confused with wheel references like RF (right front) etc.

Spirit has been mostly driving 'backwards' for the past 3 years, so backwards is rear facing and forwards is front of vehicle (IDD end).

I just love acronyms of course, but I'd be happier if Spirit just G-O (got out!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Nov 13 2009, 05:30 AM
Post #85


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Good point, Astro0, and I actually thought about that after posting. How about MER-xxx? Then we'd have MF, MB, ML, & MR.

(Boy; I have no life, do I?) rolleyes.gif tongue.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Nov 13 2009, 05:35 AM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



I like the fact that avoiding confusion forces the use of more descriptive language when describing a rover move.

Consider this a backlash against text message/tweeter speak. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Nov 13 2009, 05:50 AM
Post #87


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



I'll suggest arm-ward as the rover forward direction. I'll let someone else suggest a description for the other direction. biggrin.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Nov 13 2009, 06:13 AM
Post #88


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



Armward ho!
Attached Image

This situation does have a "Back to the Future" vibe, or in this case, Forward to the Past. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Nov 13 2009, 07:18 AM
Post #89


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



RF has a lot of traction here whatever RF means...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Nov 13 2009, 07:52 AM
Post #90


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



That's a fascinating anaglyph Fred - you can almost convince yourself you can see the crater as a depression, can't you?

I guess it could have been a lot worse; if Spirit had driven further in, and not just sank in on one side, I think the game would already be over.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

67 Pages V  « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 06:10 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.