Rev 199: Nov. 7- Dec. 17 '13, Titan's T96 flyby |
Rev 199: Nov. 7- Dec. 17 '13, Titan's T96 flyby |
Dec 9 2013, 06:12 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 29-January 09 Member No.: 4589 |
The Acta Astronautica paper linked by Steve Silva makes fascinating reading.
The optimal cruise time for a Saturn-Uranus transfer seems to be 26 years, with a Saturn departure date of Feb 8, 2020. 42 years to Neptune, departing Mar 21, 2017. (Worth noting that these are flyby- or impact missions). All unlikely to happen, of course, but fun to think about. -------------------- Protein structures and Mars fun - http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick960/
|
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 06:39 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Not unlikley to happen. IMPOSSIBLE. There is no where near enough fuel onboard to even entertain the idea.
|
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 06:51 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 78 Joined: 16-October 12 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6711 |
Can we settle for a flyby of Iapetus then?
|
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 08:08 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2082 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
No; March 2015 is the last distant encounter, at almost a million kilometers!
The mission planners have settled on a plan for the next few years and they're not going to change it without good reason. |
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 08:27 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
The mission planners have settled on a plan for the next few years and they're not going to change it without good reason. That's what I was trying to get at... the propellant necessary would mean sacrificing an incredible final tour and the proximal orbits--let's not forget that this will be unique for Cassini-- in favor of getting whatever instruments still work to another planet in several decades. For only a fly-by. All that said, neat stuff. |
|
|
Dec 12 2013, 07:58 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2082 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Back on the topic of radar coverage, here's a new radar map of the north polar seas:
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA17655 A few big blank spaces left at around 65 N, 55 W and the pole itself, but if the infrared already shows nothing there, not much point filling them in, is there? |
|
|
Dec 12 2013, 09:10 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Can we settle for a flyby of Iapetus then? You have no idea how hard they tried to fit another Iapetus flyby into the XXM tour. They wanted it badly, but while they could do lots of amazing things with very limited fuel, another Iapetus flyby would come at too high cost of other great science, so they had to give up the idea. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 01:28 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |