IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Rev 199: Nov. 7- Dec. 17 '13, Titan's T96 flyby
NickF
post Dec 9 2013, 06:12 PM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 29-January 09
Member No.: 4589



The Acta Astronautica paper linked by Steve Silva makes fascinating reading.

The optimal cruise time for a Saturn-Uranus transfer seems to be 26 years, with a Saturn departure date of Feb 8, 2020. 42 years to Neptune, departing Mar 21, 2017. (Worth noting that these are flyby- or impact missions). All unlikely to happen, of course, but fun to think about.


--------------------
Protein structures and Mars fun - http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick960/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 9 2013, 06:39 PM
Post #17


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Not unlikley to happen. IMPOSSIBLE. There is no where near enough fuel onboard to even entertain the idea.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
0101Morpheus
post Dec 9 2013, 06:51 PM
Post #18


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 78
Joined: 16-October 12
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6711



Can we settle for a flyby of Iapetus then?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Dec 9 2013, 08:08 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



No; March 2015 is the last distant encounter, at almost a million kilometers!
The mission planners have settled on a plan for the next few years and they're not going to change it without good reason.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Dec 9 2013, 08:27 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ Dec 9 2013, 03:08 PM) *
The mission planners have settled on a plan for the next few years and they're not going to change it without good reason.


That's what I was trying to get at... the propellant necessary would mean sacrificing an incredible final tour and the proximal orbits--let's not forget that this will be unique for Cassini-- in favor of getting whatever instruments still work to another planet in several decades. For only a fly-by. All that said, neat stuff.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Dec 12 2013, 07:58 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2082
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



Back on the topic of radar coverage, here's a new radar map of the north polar seas:
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA17655

A few big blank spaces left at around 65 N, 55 W and the pole itself, but if the infrared already shows nothing there, not much point filling them in, is there?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Dec 12 2013, 09:10 PM
Post #22


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (0101Morpheus @ Dec 9 2013, 10:51 AM) *
Can we settle for a flyby of Iapetus then?

You have no idea how hard they tried to fit another Iapetus flyby into the XXM tour. They wanted it badly, but while they could do lots of amazing things with very limited fuel, another Iapetus flyby would come at too high cost of other great science, so they had to give up the idea.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 01:28 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.