IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

38 Pages V  « < 36 37 38  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Exploring Gediz Vallis and its ridge, Sols 3871-xxxx, 1 Jul 2023-
jvandriel
post Jun 1 2024, 12:43 PM
Post #556


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam R view on Sol 4200.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Jun 1 2024, 04:59 PM
Post #557


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1643
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Animation between Sols 4193 and 4197 using official mosaics. Charting a new course to the west and moving further into the channel.

Attached Image


Longer steppable drive animation with a combination of official and Jan's mosaics from Sol 3435 up to the present.


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Yesterday, 12:42 AM
Post #558


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4250
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



The accuracy of the colours here isn't very certain, but I don't recall anything showing up this vivid a shade of green with these cameras before:

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Yesterday, 01:33 AM
Post #559


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Did a wheel go over this? Any one want to speculate as to what mineral would have this appearance?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Yesterday, 02:00 AM
Post #560


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4250
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Yes, they drove over it and cracked it open. You can see it on the left of this navcam frame:
https://mars.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/proj/m...NCAM00200M_.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neo56
post Yesterday, 07:13 PM
Post #561


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Brittany, France
Member No.: 79



QUOTE (fredk @ Jun 3 2024, 01:42 AM) *
The accuracy of the colours here isn't very certain, but I don't recall anything showing up this vivid a shade of green with these cameras before:



I think part of the green tint is due to debayering artifacts. Here is what I obtain after removing them.



Here is also the MC100 context mosaic of the workspace.




--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Yesterday, 08:30 PM
Post #562


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4250
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (neo56 @ Jun 3 2024, 08:13 PM) *
I think part of the green tint is due to debayering artifacts. Here is what I obtain after removing them.

It's common to see green blocks when doing a simple deBayering. But they appear on smooth areas, where the jpeg compression algorithm is tricked into compressing too much. I don't recall green artifacts on irregular areas before. Also the green deBayering artifacts follow the 8x8 pixel DCT jpeg block pattern, which these greenish areas don't.

How do you remove the green blocks - is it possible you've removed too much green?

The overall colour balance may be off somewhat in my image. And there certainly might be something about the rock here that causes some new type of artifact - we may have to wait to see colour images from the original data to know for sure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Yesterday, 09:56 PM
Post #563


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1045
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Being Mars, the automatic reaction is that it's calcium sulphate.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neville thompson
post Today, 10:37 AM
Post #564


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 892
Joined: 9-September 17
From: UK
Member No.: 8241




Gigapan - MSL 4202 MR
© NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/NeV-T
--------------------------------------
GigaMacro - MSL 4202 MR
© NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/ASU/NeV-T


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Today, 05:28 PM
Post #565


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



re fredk and serpens
Gypsum can be green if it contains a little copper.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neville thompson
post Today, 06:05 PM
Post #566


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 892
Joined: 9-September 17
From: UK
Member No.: 8241



QUOTE (fredk @ Jun 3 2024, 08:30 PM) *
It's common to see green blocks when doing a simple deBayering. But they appear on smooth areas, where the jpeg compression algorithm is tricked into compressing too much. I don't recall green artifacts on irregular areas before. Also the green deBayering artifacts follow the 8x8 pixel DCT jpeg block pattern, which these greenish areas don't.

How do you remove the green blocks - is it possible you've removed too much green?

The overall colour balance may be off somewhat in my image. And there certainly might be something about the rock here that causes some new type of artifact - we may have to wait to see colour images from the original data to know for sure.



Try using HLVG been using it for years - pretty good

https://www.deepskycolors.com/tools-tutorials/hlvg/


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neo56
post Today, 08:47 PM
Post #567


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Brittany, France
Member No.: 79



QUOTE (fredk @ Jun 3 2024, 09:30 PM) *
It's common to see green blocks when doing a simple deBayering. But they appear on smooth areas, where the jpeg compression algorithm is tricked into compressing too much. I don't recall green artifacts on irregular areas before. Also the green deBayering artifacts follow the 8x8 pixel DCT jpeg block pattern, which these greenish areas don't.

How do you remove the green blocks - is it possible you've removed too much green?

The overall colour balance may be off somewhat in my image. And there certainly might be something about the rock here that causes some new type of artifact - we may have to wait to see colour images from the original data to know for sure.


I use "Replace color" tool on Photoshop, selecting greenish areas and decreasing their hue of -10.
It's possible I've removed too much green. But I suspect the color of these bright crystals being affected by some sort of green artifacts.
The correction made by Neville is really good at removing greenish blocks.
Let's see what the color calibrated data look like when it'll be released.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

38 Pages V  « < 36 37 38
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th June 2024 - 09:16 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.