IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

55 Pages V  « < 53 54 55  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Ingenuity- Mars 2020 Helicopter, Deployment & Operations
mcaplinger
post Feb 26 2024, 11:42 PM
Post #811


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2547
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (serpens @ Feb 26 2024, 03:11 PM) *
the left side of the solar panel is pushed down 90 degrees.

No, you are seeing the remaining part of one of the lower blades. The solar panel is undamaged and undisturbed.

I think the detached blade is consistent with being the whole half of the upper blade, broken at or near the root.

Much clearer image at https://www.flickr.com/photos/semeion/53549974562/


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Feb 27 2024, 09:03 PM
Post #812


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1064
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Aah, clear now. I stand corrected.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Feb 29 2024, 04:31 AM
Post #813


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE (serpens @ Feb 26 2024, 06:11 PM) *
Yes, the blade end position and nearby impact mark indicate a straight line to Ingenuity's position. But the actual impact sequence is less clear. There seem to be two blade collision points (upper and lower?) and the left side of the solar panel is pushed down 90 degrees. Hard to see anything but a strike by an upper blade segment causing that and Tau's image seems to reveal only the inner section of the blade. Carbon fibre is strong and light but the blade tip speed is around 240mps and the velocity squared dominates in kinetic energy. I may be missing something but the impact outcomes on the blade seem complex, possibly a bend fracture then break at both the bend and the blade root, all at an impressive rotational velocity. Is there a missing part of the blade hiding somewhere?


It can be hard to say or visualize what a copter blade will do when impacting soft substrate at a low angle.
Ginny is down for the count but led a most excellent technology demonstration.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Feb 29 2024, 11:36 PM
Post #814


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 613
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Feb 28 2024, 11:31 PM) *
It can be hard to say or visualize what a copter blade will do when impacting soft substrate at a low angle.


The interaction of the striking blade tip with the sand ripple, and its direct local effects on a composite structure, are indeed not well-constrained.

However, I suspect it is the other blade of that rotor that broke and was flung away. You can see this happen on lots of youtube videos of helicopter crashes, notably those where the blades hit water. The sudden angular deceleration of the rotor causes a huge bending moment at the root of the other blades, which feel strong compulsion from Newton's First Law.......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Apr 17 2024, 07:23 AM
Post #815


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I didn’t know that Ingenuity was still been collecting data potentially for up to 20 more years :
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-ingenui...goodbye-for-now


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Apr 17 2024, 02:13 PM
Post #816


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 717
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



What's not clear from that report is whether Perseverance might retrieve data accumulated so far when, for instance, it passes by Ingenuity on its way back from the rim to Three Forks. Odd that that possibility wasn't mentioned.

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Apr 17 2024, 02:30 PM
Post #817


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2113
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



On the one hand, the transmitter would have to remain functioning by 2028 (if that does indeed become the plan for the sample return), and on the other, perhaps the rover might come back by another route?
If data can actually be gathered for such a long time, it will be a very impressive feat regardless!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Apr 17 2024, 03:06 PM
Post #818


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1598
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



The daily plan - one image, engineering data - apparently this can be done for >7000 days w/o running out of memory.

*That* said, it'd be amazing if it would even be long enough for another rover or lander to come within range.

The other point made is... it's all going on the nonvolatile memory chips. So even if it's dead, the flash should tell the tale of however many days it passes, if you can get to it physically. I suspect that would be at least 7000 days. biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tau
post May 5 2024, 10:40 AM
Post #819


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 835
Joined: 9-May 21
From: Germany
Member No.: 9017



Here are two more "very last" pictures of Ingenuity, taken on sol 1138 with Mastcam-Z and on sol 1139 with SuperCam Remote Micro-Imager.
The dark spots to the left of Ingenuity on the other side of the dune are presumably the first touchdown marks.
The lost rotor blade can be seen in the lower part of the SuperCam RMI image.

Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

55 Pages V  « < 53 54 55
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:09 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.