IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
Cape York - Northern Havens, Sol 2780 - 2947
Phil Stooke
post Dec 2 2011, 04:31 PM
Post #106


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Ant's panorama in circular format:

Attached Image


Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Dec 3 2011, 12:34 AM
Post #107


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



On sol 2786, Oppy took 12 left-eye images of the sun-dial. The two sets of 6 images were offset in time (the shadow moved)
So, I stacked them all anyways to improve S/N (and lost all' color' info in the process)
Someone please tell me that MSL will be able to focus its sun-dial better...
(you can almost read 'two worlds one sun' at the bottom)
Attached Image



--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Dec 3 2011, 12:54 AM
Post #108


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



The sundial is actually slightly closer than the minimum focal distance of the pancam. You might be able to improve things by applying a deconvolution algorithm.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 3 2011, 12:57 AM
Post #109


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (PDP8E @ Dec 2 2011, 04:34 PM) *
Someone please tell me that MSL will be able to focus its sun-dial better...


MSL's MastCam's can pull focus. The MER PanCam can not.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matt Lenda
post Dec 3 2011, 02:39 AM
Post #110


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 17-July 11
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 6066



QUOTE (walfy @ Dec 1 2011, 11:37 PM) *
Amazing that there's still adequate charge with all the dust! A non-nuclear future mission could have little fans along the edge of the panels, for the occasional dust-off.

[attachment=26095:dust_factor.jpg]

For now, let's hope hope for one of these: dd.gif

This makes me sad-face... but then happy-face again since, you know, Oppy's still chugging along like it ain't no thang.

-m
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Dec 3 2011, 04:46 AM
Post #111


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



What a glorious mess:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Dec 3 2011, 04:55 AM
Post #112


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE
You might be able to improve things by applying a deconvolution algorithm
And the "IR bands" (L2 and R7) are worse about being a bit soft inside that DoF (Depth of Focus) hyperfocal range (ah, that is the word I was trying to remember) and those close-in shots (Sundial and foreground quarter) generally benefit by sharpening up the red channel.

QUOTE
This makes me sad-face... but then happy-face again
Yeppers. Like Harry Callahan used to say, "You gots to know your limitations"...

The Saddleback sequence (p2438) from Sol-2793 is astounding but the Foreground Quarter (p2587) hasn't made it to Exploratorium yet.

--Bill
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Dec 3 2011, 03:47 PM
Post #113


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



Yes, MSL's Mastcams can focus at a range of distances. But, as with Pancam, the foremost desire is to provide good focus for Mars. The Pancams have a wide field of view; the Mastcams do not have such a wide FOV. So, do not expect perfect focus on the cal target ("sundial")--but do expect very good pictures of that and everything else.

FWIW, having the cal targets be in focus for Pancam would have required either (a) a much larger depth of field, with a side effect of much noisier images (especially in blue, green, and 1-micron filter); or (cool.gif having the horizon--and anything past, a few m--be out of focus instead. Everything is a trade (like ineffectual solar panel fans vs. a science payload). The Pancams (like IMP and SSI) are set at their hyperfocal position, such that "infinity" is at one end of the depth of field, the other end is somewhere around 2-3 m, and best focus is in between (like 5m or so).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Dec 3 2011, 08:35 PM
Post #114


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Cape York just keeps giving and giving, doesn't it?

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 3 2011, 09:50 PM
Post #115


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Oh, man... ohmy.gif ...so do you, Stu! That's a beautiful image.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Dec 4 2011, 04:22 AM
Post #116


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



In this nice view looking back to Turkey Haven the rock on the low ledge doesn't look so brittle where the three wheels rolled over (in the foreground). If my calculations were right, that's about 11.4 kilograms (25 lbs) per wheel! (Weight of rover: 180 kg. Gravity on Mars: 38% of Earth's. Number of wheels: 6.) But that's assuming each wheel carries equal load, which might not be the case. unsure.gif

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Dec 4 2011, 09:35 AM
Post #117


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2820
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Pancam L2 view on Sol 2792.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Dec 4 2011, 10:15 AM
Post #118


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Updated view of "Saddleback"... so many fascinating features, hues and shapes here all you can do is pan across the image and shake your head in wonder...

Attached Image


Full size version up on my RtE blog now...

http://roadtoendeavour.wordpress.com/2011/...-birthday-to-us

(to celebrate its 3rd birthday...feel free to drop by, bring a bottle, there'll be nibbles... smile.gif )


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Dec 4 2011, 01:57 PM
Post #119





Guests






Saddleback/Blencathra?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Dec 4 2011, 02:26 PM
Post #120


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Wow... I hadn't made that connection, which is a bit embarrassing seeing as I don't live *that* far from Blencathra... well spotted, Sunspot... when you look at the rocks up there they look **very** familiar, don't they?

Attached Image


Could just be a coincidence, haven't checked into it very deeply yet, but if they have named this martian feature after the Cumbrian fell Blencathra, maybe one of the rover team has been walking in the Lakes at some point, that would be great to know! smile.gif

(More Blencathra info and pics here: http://www.stridingedge.net/wainwright%20f.../Blencathra.htm )


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

40 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 08:11 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.