Jupiter Impact 2009 |
Jupiter Impact 2009 |
Jul 24 2009, 07:34 PM
Post
#91
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
Man, I love the Hubble! That picture is incredible
-------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
Jul 24 2009, 07:40 PM
Post
#92
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
Sweet Fancy Moses!!!!!
-------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Jul 24 2009, 09:05 PM
Post
#93
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Jul 24 2009, 10:26 PM
Post
#94
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
That downrange disturbance almost looks like the measurable effects of a shock-wave which in turn probably says something about the atmospheric density and structure in that region. Clearly there's a whole lot of derived science that likely will be gleaned from these images.
-------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Jul 24 2009, 10:33 PM
Post
#95
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
You know, if we keep seeing these things happen on Jupiter & (hopefully!) the other gas giants, we're going to have to come up with some sort of workable nomenclature for all these features.
Virtually every bit of impact terminology relates to solid matter (craters, ejecta, etc.). What do you call a persistent hole in a cloud deck that apparently spews stuff out & has other stuff laying around on surrounding clouds? -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Guest_Sunspot_* |
Jul 24 2009, 10:52 PM
Post
#96
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Jul 24 2009, 11:30 PM
Post
#97
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
we're going to have to come up with some sort of workable nomenclature for all these features. "Impact"... "dwarf impact"... "brush with"..."jeez, that was close!"... -------------------- |
|
|
Jul 24 2009, 11:57 PM
Post
#98
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Just don't put ME in charge of that...doubt that many (if any) of my terms would be printable!
Ordinary adjectives just aren't sufficient to describe these titanic events. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jul 25 2009, 12:27 AM
Post
#99
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
I think in the case of impacts onto gas giants, the old term for a meteor crater, "astrobleme," works well. It really is more of a blemish than a crater -- and like a blemish, it will fade over time.
Almost looks like there was the familiar-from-SL9 "black-eye" effect of downstream ejecta to the left, plus a very long, very dark ejected plume that pushed back out from left to right in these images. I get the feel of an impactor on a shallow, fast trajectory moving from right to left (in the Hubble images; all this would be reversed in the original discovery photos and the Gemini images), the "black-eye" ejecta pushing ahead of the impact site (perhaps defined by shock waves from the impact), and a plume of very dark material (mostly gas, I imagine) being fountained out of the impact site back along the impactor's track, from left to right, making up the very dark, now-deforming oval marking the astrobleme. Just my gut-level feel from looking at these new, sharp images... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jul 25 2009, 12:44 AM
Post
#100
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Yeah, I was thinking about "astrobleme" myself, oDoug; it really is apropos for these things, as you pointed out.
I'm sure that there are hordes of scientists that would gladly give one or more internal organs to know exactly what that dark material is composed of. I suspect that it's some sort of precipitate: hot, formerly highly pressurized gas from down below that's abruptly been exposed to cold & low pressure in the cloudtops. Wonder if astroblemes might be a productive molecular synthesis mechanism over time. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jul 25 2009, 02:18 AM
Post
#101
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 696 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
I think it's most likely that the dark stuff is hydrocarbon gunk cooked up from the ambient methane by the high temperatures of the impact. The dark stuff in the diffuse halo may even form in place, from the high temperatures generated when the ejecta slams back into the upper atmosphere- heat from that mechanism was what produced the bright near-IR flashes seen in the SL9 impacts.
John |
|
|
Jul 25 2009, 08:51 PM
Post
#102
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 688 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 273 |
Since these impacts are apparently fairly frequent (since we have observed two in a short time) and the "gunk" produced should be fairly stable in the low temperatures prevailing in the upper atmosphere one wonders how much "gunk" accumulates and to what extent it contributes to Jupiter's colourful atmosphere.
I would expect that the molecules will ultimately sink deep enough into the atmosphere for the heat to break them up into simple molecules again, but that should be a slow process. |
|
|
Jul 25 2009, 09:24 PM
Post
#103
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 115 Joined: 8-January 05 From: Austin | Texas Member No.: 138 |
The new images from Hubble are going to be incredible -- does anyone have an idea of how frequently they will be updating?
|
|
|
Jul 25 2009, 11:24 PM
Post
#104
|
||
Member Group: Members Posts: 378 Joined: 21-April 05 From: Portugal Member No.: 347 |
The impact feature is easily visible on small telescopes.
Here's an image I got last night: I didn't expect it to be that detailed, so it's really worth to observe if you can, even if just visually. -------------------- _______________________
www.astrosurf.com/nunes |
|
|
||
Jul 26 2009, 02:25 AM
Post
#105
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 314 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
Given that the frequency of large impacts may be higher than we have thought, Junocam might end up being a very useful asset indeed!
P |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 08:56 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |