IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

27 Pages V  « < 15 16 17 18 19 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
INCOMING!, Detection and observation of Earth-approaching asteroids.
ugordan
post Oct 11 2010, 07:37 AM
Post #241


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 11 2010, 02:14 AM) *
Am I the only one who WANTS another to hit? (though obviously below a size limit where damage might occur)

Guilty here...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Oct 11 2010, 07:53 AM
Post #242


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Same. If it's under 20m in diameter bring it on! smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SolarSystemRubbl...
post Oct 12 2010, 03:31 AM
Post #243


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 5-September 07
From: High Bridge, New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 3669



As seems to happen with the tiny close approach asteroids, the observation count for 2010 TD54 is skyrocketing. Already 62 obs in 2 days with a late evening update. (Sentry data, NEODyS has not updated)

The close approach time has advanced 2 minutes to 10:49 UTC tomorrow, Oct 12 (A bit less than 8 hours from now)

The distance is reduced a bit, to (nominal distance) 51,789 km (32,180 miles) from the earth's center, or about 45,420 km from the surface. Minimum distance (1 sigma) is about 75 km less. 0% chance of impact.

Number of listed close approaches to other objects have increased. Passes about 1 LD from the moon 2 hours after earth CA. Venus in November this year and 2016, Vesta in 2029, Earth in 2055,2057,2068, and 2126, Mars in 2071 and 2127, and Venus in 2129 and 2135. Obviously, they are manually running the projection past the normal Sentry automatic 2110 cutoff.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 12 2010, 05:32 AM
Post #244


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Thanks for this update, SolarSystemRubble!
Any new information on object physical characteristics? (size, rotation, etc)?


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SolarSystemRubbl...
post Oct 12 2010, 09:30 AM
Post #245


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 5-September 07
From: High Bridge, New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 3669



Size (estimated from H=28.8) would be expected to be 4-10 meters, but that's a guess based on assumed albedo. Any rotation data would take a bit of time to be analyzed, and since was only discovered 48 hours ago, obs are coming in hot and heavy. About 80 minutes to close approach (will pass over southeast Asia, from what I've read)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SolarSystemRubbl...
post Oct 12 2010, 10:07 AM
Post #246


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 5-September 07
From: High Bridge, New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 3669



2010 TD54 including 76 observations through 01:50 UT.

No change to timing (10:49 UTC, about 40 minutes from now) or nominal distance (51,789 km from earth center). Uncertainty in CA distance reduced to 51 km.

Future close appoaches trimmed.

Moon, 2 hours after earth CA, 317,000 km

Venus Nov 9 (Sentry only) 0.09 AU
Venus 2016 (Sentry only) 0.07 AU
4 Vesta 2029 (Sentry and NEODyS) 0.02/0.03 AU
Mars 2030 (NEODyS only) 0.02 AU
Earth 2033 (NEODyS only) 0.11 AU
Earth 2044 (Sentry and NEODyS) 0.10 AU
Earth 2046 (Sentry only) 0.41 AU
Earth 2068 (NEODyS only) 0.07 AU
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SolarSystemRubbl...
post Oct 12 2010, 04:37 PM
Post #247


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 5-September 07
From: High Bridge, New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 3669



In response to the earlier question about rotation; if you look at the second video, you can see there is a periodic light curve, so with a little time some shape and rotation estimates will be possible.

http://www.universetoday.com/75564/video-a...close-to-earth/

Just a rough estimate, I'd say about a 30 second peak to peak light curve.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post Oct 12 2010, 08:46 PM
Post #248


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



Any comments that this might be a spent rocket stage of some sort?
I love the fact that soon we'll be able to detect these early enough and figure out where to fly for one HELL of an awesome fireball.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Oct 12 2010, 08:53 PM
Post #249


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (hendric @ Oct 12 2010, 10:46 PM) *
Any comments that this might be a spent rocket stage of some sort?


from the latest orbital elements the perihelion is at 0.68 AU and aphelion is at 2.89 AU. artificial objects tend to have one of the two close to Earth's orbit because that is the less "expensive" way to place something in orbit around the Sun.
I am quite sure that this is a natural rock
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Oct 13 2010, 12:47 AM
Post #250


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



QUOTE
soon we'll be able to detect these early enough and figure out where to fly for one HELL of an awesome fireball.


Amusing to think of a bunch of folks waiting for an incoming meteor like SF Giants baseball fans in McCovey Cove in their kayaks, waiting for a home run! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Oct 13 2010, 03:18 AM
Post #251


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (Paolo @ Oct 12 2010, 04:53 PM) *
from the latest orbital elements the perihelion is at 0.68 AU and aphelion is at 2.89 AU. artificial objects tend to have one of the two close to Earth's orbit because that is the less "expensive" way to place something in orbit around the Sun.
I am quite sure that this is a natural rock


Would all the early space-age probes that flew by Venus still have a 1 AU aphelion?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmuller
post Oct 13 2010, 03:41 AM
Post #252


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 11-April 08
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 4093



QUOTE (stevesliva @ Oct 13 2010, 01:18 PM) *
Would all the early space-age probes that flew by Venus still have a 1 AU aphelion?

Probably not, but ... I'm speculating here ... raising aphelion from 1AU to 2.8AU (half-way to Jupiter) with accidental (i.e. non-targeted, non-planned) gravity assists at Venus seems a stretch. Galileo needed a well-planned Venus AND Earth flyby to raise its aphelion to 2.8AU-ish. IIRC early Soviet probes to Venus had a strongly type 1 (or 2 ... always mix them up) trajectory, trying to get there faster than a Hohman transfer, but I don't think their aphelions were far beyond Earth.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Oct 27 2010, 02:22 PM
Post #253


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



QUOTE (SFJCody @ Oct 11 2010, 08:53 AM) *
Same. If it's under 20m in diameter bring it on! smile.gif


It would be great to have a ringside seat for a nearside moon impact of something of this size (or bigger), a bit scary being underneath something headed for earth though. ohmy.gif

Incidentally, an interesting calculator of local and global effects of impactors can be found here

It's a program whereby you can enter different parameters for the incoming body (size, density, velocity etc) and the program generates information on the impact effects.

Ghoulish, but fun..

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Holder of the Tw...
post Feb 5 2011, 06:08 AM
Post #254


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 540
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Oklahoma
Member No.: 557



A small rock (about four feet across, or a meter to a meter and a half) just skimmed by the earth. It was spotted and tracked several hours before closest approach.

JPL report link
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post Feb 5 2011, 03:56 PM
Post #255


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



Interesting.

A ring side seat watching an object shift from an Apollo asteroid orbit to an Aten class.

60 degree deflection upon encountering earth's gravity!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

27 Pages V  « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 03:07 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.