IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity General Health
vjkane
post Apr 28 2018, 07:52 PM
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 704
Joined: 22-April 05
Member No.: 351



QUOTE (RoverDriver @ Apr 27 2018, 10:46 PM) *
There are two things I would redesign:

Maybe ultraflex solar panels for more power

This thread isn't totally idle speculation. The Mars community is considering a line of future MER-size rovers to explore the diversity of surface types with past histories of water. With modern instruments, it could be really nice upgrade.

I suspect that a precision landing system would also be high on the list for a future rover line.

Would be nice to have a single general purpose heat source RTG (MMRTG's have 8) to supplement the solar array for survival heating and power during dust storms. Of course, the mission cost just sky rocketed due to the certifications.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Apr 29 2018, 02:05 PM
Post #32


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4245
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (marsophile @ Apr 28 2018, 06:39 AM) *
In this well-lit image, it appears to be an original equipment plastic cover that is fraying and coming loose.

Not surprizingly sharp-eyed members here spotted this years ago - check out the animation here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Apr 29 2018, 05:50 PM
Post #33


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



QUOTE (vjkane @ Apr 28 2018, 12:52 PM) *
Maybe ultraflex solar panels for more power.

More power maybe, but what about deployed rigidity? A rover going over rocks and pot holes in the road no doubt will put alot of vibrational stress on the bonded cells and structure. Was there ever testing done on this for the MAX-C concept?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 29 2018, 08:30 PM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2502
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (James Sorenson @ Apr 29 2018, 09:50 AM) *
Was there ever testing done on this for the MAX-C concept?

As far as I know MAX-C was a series of viewgraphs "designed" by scientists and systems people. Engineers generally come in and make things work only after the mission is selected.

Let's put this speculative discussion somewhere else as it's off-topic for MER. The rover after M2020 will likely resemble MER only in that it will have wheels and drive around. smile.gif


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Apr 29 2018, 08:35 PM
Post #35


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2502
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (peter.neaum @ Apr 27 2018, 01:59 PM) *
My thought was 'what wear is there in a brushless motor?'

The bearings and gear teeth still see wear in a brushless motor.

Predicting the lifetime of any mechanical system, or any system at all for that matter, is a bit of a black art.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post May 4 2018, 08:57 PM
Post #36


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



Looks like some research is being done for low-temp batteries. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02631-9


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post May 6 2018, 04:04 PM
Post #37


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2073
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



The meantime... the newest A.J.S. Rayl update shows that apparently the power situation is so good, the team is attempting to use the excess(!) for more astronomical observations:
http://www.planetary.org/explore/space-top...-extension.html

I am wondering what the issue is with the batteries remaining fully charged; I've heard about this before, but does anyone have more details? Not just asking because I'm a laptop user who wants to preserve my own as much as possible...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post May 6 2018, 04:44 PM
Post #38


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2502
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ May 6 2018, 08:04 AM) *
I am wondering what the issue is with the batteries remaining fully charged; I've heard about this before, but does anyone have more details?

http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article...based_batteries

Your battery would last longest if you constantly maintained it at somewhere between 50% and 75% of capacity. Of course you want to discharge it sometimes since otherwise there's not much point in having a battery.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 03:50 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.