InSight Surface Operations, 26 Nov 2018- 21 Dec 2022 |
InSight Surface Operations, 26 Nov 2018- 21 Dec 2022 |
Oct 27 2019, 11:09 PM
Post
#751
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 10-December 06 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1472 |
I guess the soil crashed and filled the gap opening under the probe by the hammering. The properties of the regolith remind me of what Arthur C. Clarke wrote in "A Fall of Moondust": "This dust has the worst properties of solids and liquids, with none of their advantages. It won't flow when you want it to, it won't stay put when you want it to." Maybe one has to think of it as a very viscous fluid rather than a proper solid. I don't know whether the change in the season and temperature has affected the properties of the soil in any way.
|
|
|
Oct 27 2019, 11:10 PM
Post
#752
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
It's worth remembering that no one would have proposed doing the heat flow experiment this way if there had been a more straightforward drilling technique that would fit within the mission constraints.
As was pointed out earlier, even with many fewer constraints, the Apollo heat flow experiments didn't work well the first two times and Apollo 17's only got down about 2.5 meters. https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/a15carrier.html -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 01:55 AM
Post
#753
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2082 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Exactly. This is alien soil on an alien planet. We have no idea what to expect. And of course, the mole has no way of 'knowing' if it's moving in the wrong direction, so it just kept on unearthing (unmarsing?) itself until the commanded strokes ran out, right?
|
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 05:02 AM
Post
#754
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10151 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Not sure I can accept the explanation that high frequency drilling is the problem. Soil falls in front of the rebounding mole? That takes time, even if only a tiny increment of time, so I expect it is less likely with faster operation. But what do I know? (spoiler: nothing). Only testing is reliable, and even that is difficult when considering another world. Do we know anything about other kinds of percussion drilling that might be significant here?
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 06:52 AM
Post
#755
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 13-June 08 Member No.: 4206 |
Do we know anything about other kinds of percussion drilling that might be significant here? Phil While not really percussion drilling, why not a self-contained pile driver? There would be no recoil. The mole would need to be longer and of a larger diameter of course to accommodate a weight.. And its effectiveness would diminish if it turns away from the vertical. But there would be no back-filling of material at the front tip. No vibrations to "break friction" on the sides. 100% reliant on gravity to generate the downward motion of the internal impactor. It would still be all self-contained, using mass instead of springs. And it work at 1 hit per second more or less. |
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 02:27 PM
Post
#756
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
While not really percussion drilling, why not a self-contained pile driver? Are you sure you know how the mole works? See http://esmats.eu/amspapers/pastpapers/pdfs...grygorczuk2.pdf and https://www.geomechanics.caltech.edu/public...shall-2017a.pdf for details. One assumes that if they could have gotten a more robust solution into the mass/volume/power box they were in, they would have done so. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 03:24 PM
Post
#757
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 201 Joined: 16-December 13 Member No.: 7067 |
the difference between the successful sessions and this one was the scoop directly touching the mole vs pressing on the ground. maybe it isn't so much backfill, but the mole bouncing off the far wall, rebounding, and catching because its tilted over and levered against the far wall? maybe touching the mole stopped much of the rebound, but now it was one step forward and two steps back? the scoop was definitely pushing into a crumbling hole more than ever
the good news is the retreat slowed down in the second 150 hammers, vs the first 150 where it popped almost all the way out |
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 03:29 PM
Post
#758
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Last week's Mars Society talk by Tom Hoffman is up on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1yJPFRuv74 Mole / Pit of Doom discussion is around 18 minutes in. Interestingly at about 21:45, he says "We need friction ... because we have the 100N force down and about 7N force back up. We did some experiments on earth where if we had the right conditions the mole could either bounce or come back up." |
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 07:04 PM
Post
#759
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 808 Joined: 10-October 06 From: Maynard Mass USA Member No.: 1241 |
Holey Moley!
Looking at the images on the Insight site, the mole just popped out! (a cascading backfill from the hole side material to the conical tip, all the way to the surface?) I see a shovel on that arm, maybe dig a good-sized hole/trench and then put mole in there? Wow, that was unexpected! -------------------- CLA CLL
|
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 08:02 PM
Post
#760
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 12-August 12 Member No.: 6541 |
What proportion of the mole is still under ground?
|
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 08:29 PM
Post
#761
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2082 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Half is still below, according to the bold text here: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7519
|
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 09:58 PM
Post
#762
|
||
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
NASA page essentially the same details.
It seems Mars will just certainly not have any of this kind of thing going on! Gif animation (5fps) of unsettling shennanigans seen on Sol325 |
|
|
||
Oct 28 2019, 10:21 PM
Post
#763
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 24-July 15 Member No.: 7619 |
Not sure I can accept the explanation that high frequency drilling is the problem. Soil falls in front of the rebounding mole? That takes time, even if only a tiny increment of time, so I expect it is less likely with faster operation. But what do I know? (spoiler: nothing). Only testing is reliable, and even that is difficult when considering another world. Do we know anything about other kinds of percussion drilling that might be significant here? Phil Drilling alters the frictional properties of the soil. Could be that impacts are heating up the soil and lubricating the mole. e.g. friction generates heat, heat melts ices, melted ices and clay becomes a slippery mud. Could be that repeatedly hammering into a conglomerate-duracrust horizon grinds the soil into a finer particles that act like ooblick and push the mole backward. Could be like driving across a dry lake after a rain, clay covered by water is structurally stable, but if you stop and add too much force, you mix the clay and water into mud and you loose friction. |
|
|
Oct 28 2019, 10:31 PM
Post
#764
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 12-August 12 Member No.: 6541 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2019, 05:39 PM
Post
#765
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 15-November 14 Member No.: 7320 |
In the new DLR blog entry from Tilman Spohn he's still positiv. Nothing is mentioned about a technical error. The mole itself seems fine. They want to inspect the pit and then hope to drive the mole back in. But how?
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 06:31 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |