Origin of Phobos and Deimos, Where did these guys come from? |
Origin of Phobos and Deimos, Where did these guys come from? |
Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Dec 5 2008, 04:33 PM
Post
#31
|
Guests |
Phobos and Deimos ( Fear & Terror ): http://www.astroshorts.com/view_video.php?...bf4fc791ba842aa
|
|
|
Sep 23 2010, 01:27 PM
Post
#32
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 16-May 06 From: Geneva, Switzerland Member No.: 773 |
Martian moon Phobos may have formed by catastrophic blast:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/...00920094804.htm So finally, it seems not to be a captured asteroid, but formed from pieces of Mars itself ! Marc. |
|
|
Oct 1 2010, 09:02 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 6-August 10 From: Flagstaff, Arizona Member No.: 5402 |
While very interesting, this is not quite as conclusive as the article suggests. The overall reflectivity of Phobos is much lower than of Mars rocks. Carbonaceous chondrites are the best match. Also, it is expected that there is a good collection of rocks blasted off of Mars that have landed on Phobos (hence a sample return mission from Phobos is expected to bring back Mars rocks as well as whatever Phobos is made of). The Mars-like minerals could be from these rocks, not what the bulk of Phobos is made of.
|
|
|
Oct 1 2010, 09:19 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10151 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
"The overall reflectivity of Phobos is much lower than of Mars rocks."
Well, the albedo of Phobos is lower than the albedo of Mars, but most of Mars is covered with bright dust. I'm not so sure that Phobos is darker than actual Mars rocks, most of which would be of basalt-like composition. I thought the story was a bit misleading in another way... the rejection of a carbonaceous asteroid composition goes back quite a long way, based on things like the Mars Pathfinder multispectral imaging of Phobos, and Phobos-2 spectral data. Several papers have already said Phobos is not asteroid-like in composition. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Jul 6 2011, 05:37 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 6-March 10 From: London, Ontario, CANADA Member No.: 5247 |
One of the quotes in the Science daily article is interesting:
"We detected for the first time a type of mineral called phyllosilicates on the surface of Phobos, particularly in the areas northeast of Stickney, its largest impact crater," says Dr. Giuranna. The article goes on to imply that this means that the water-bearing minerals must have come from Mars. There are many carbonaceous chondrites that contain -and are even dominated by- phyllosilicates. -------------------- "We absolutely must leave room for doubt or there is no progress and there is no learning." -Richard P. Feynman
|
|
|
Jul 7 2011, 12:14 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 315 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
QUOTE "We detected for the first time a type of mineral called phyllosilicates on the surface of Phobos, particularly in the areas northeast of Stickney, its largest impact crater," says Dr. Giuranna. So a sample return to and from Phobos might actually be a cheap n nasty way of a very generalised Mars sample return without all that nasty delta V? P |
|
|
Jul 7 2011, 12:49 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
Aren't phyllosilicates also found on comets? Could they have been delivered by a cometary impactor?
-------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Jul 7 2011, 02:58 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
Phyllosilicates are very popular these days. Last time I was at JPL there was a disheveled looking guy leaning on his car a few blocks down the street. As I walked past he said "Pssst, hey buddy, you look like a scientist. You want to see some phyllosilicates?" He popped open the trunk of his car and said, "C'mere man check these out. I got serpentine, micas, clays, talc, whatever you want, real cheap."
-------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Jul 7 2011, 05:58 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 259 Joined: 23-January 05 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 156 |
So a sample return to and from Phobos might actually be a cheap n nasty way of a very generalised Mars sample return without all that nasty delta V? We've already had cheap 'n' nasty sample return from Mars, zero delta-V required. But presumably Phobos has picked up some Martian ejecta over eons. |
|
|
Jul 12 2011, 03:08 AM
Post
#40
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 6-March 10 From: London, Ontario, CANADA Member No.: 5247 |
Aren't phyllosilicates also found on comets? Could they have been delivered by a cometary impactor? Yes. Comets are possible sources of phyllosilicates too. Stardust oddly has not turned up much in the way of phyllosilicates (i.e. water-bearing `clay' minerals) though. -pjam -------------------- "We absolutely must leave room for doubt or there is no progress and there is no learning." -Richard P. Feynman
|
|
|
Jul 13 2011, 07:55 AM
Post
#41
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 20-March 10 From: Western Australia Member No.: 5275 |
Obviously, don't know much, but yeah, I'm beginning to think that Phobos and Deimos are
chunks of Mars. |
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 02:29 AM
Post
#42
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 17-March 05 Member No.: 206 |
I had a thought today about a possible method of estimating the age of Phobos' formation. Since Phobos is slowly spiraling in towards Mars (and is estimated to break up in 30-50 million years), could not a calculation be done in 'reverse' to see how long ago Phobos would have been in/near a areo-synchronous orbit around Mars? In other words, we know that Phobos must have been formed/captured somewhere inside a synchronous orbit, otherwise, it would never have spiraled in-ward in the first place. Therefore running the calculation backward would give a maximum age in which Phobos would have formed or captured.
Right now, Phobos orbits approximately 6,000k above Mars and the areo-synchronous altitude is 17,200km, a distance of 11,200km. I understand that Phobos is descending at a current rate of ~1.8cm per year. That rate of orbital decay is not constant (it increases the closer it descends), but I am sure someone has an equation (differential formula?) which could calculate that. Any ideas about this? |
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 04:19 AM
Post
#43
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
Running time backwards we see Phobos spiraling back out, but as it does so it crosses various resonances with Deimos, and Deimos might be subject to forces changing it's orbit too. I'd think it would get difficult to know how long a particular resonance might have persisted, and which ones might have been active.
Tough problem, just thinking about the math makes me dizzy. |
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 04:23 AM
Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
The problem is that simply reversing the orbit dynamics in time gets to the point where you require another body in the equation to effect the orbital capture. And it's impossible to tell what those dynamics were.
Myself, I prefer the theory that a fairly large and rapidly spinning body broke up when it passed within Mars' Roche limit. Part of of it impacted Mars, part of it achieved escape velocity, and two pretty big chunks ended up in stable orbits. Other chunks ended up in unstable orbits and eventually hit Mars. At what time this happened is probably most easily constrained by looking at the age of craters/basins that could have been caused by such a catastrophic impact. You can place the event at almost any point in the time-reversed orbital history of the moons by simply adjusting the size, speed and trajectory of the body that came apart, so such a reverse-time orbital analysis would be less useful for constraining the timeframe, I would imagine. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 05:46 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 17-March 05 Member No.: 206 |
Running time backwards we see Phobos spiraling back out, but as it does so it crosses various resonances with Deimos, and Deimos might be subject to forces changing it's orbit too. Good point which I did not consider. But would resonances be significant for such low mass moons? Unlike the Galilean moons, which have considerable mass and are in resonance, these moons are only 22km (Phobos) and 6km across (Deimos). Even if we put Phobos near the areo-synchronous altitude of 17,000km, it would still be ~6,000km from Deimos. I would think gravitational disturbances with such low masses would be very minor at that distance... Even if there were some sort of resonance, would it prevent the kind of tidal orbital decay of a moon under the areo-synchronous altitude? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 05:20 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |