IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite
Paolo
post Apr 6 2013, 10:10 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1146
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



a new Explorer satellite dedicated to exoplanets around near stars

NASA Selects Explorer Investigations for Formulation


--------------------
I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.

James Van Allen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Apr 10 2013, 06:52 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1512
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



TESS will look for exoplanets around nearby stars. The catch with the transiting method is that geometry doesn't do us any favors: Any planets which don't transit can't be seen, and the farther the planet is from the star, the less likely a favorable alignment is.

The probability of a transit varies from over 20% for planets with periods of a few days to less than 1% for planets at a distance of about 1 AU. So even if 100% of stars have a planet at 1 AU, you'd have to monitor hundreds of stars to see a few such planets. And when you talk about hundreds of stars, you're no longer talking about "nearby."

Kepler addresses this by looking at many stars farther away -- Kepler stars are basically between about 500 and 6500 light years away.

TESS will monitor about two million stars looking for planets with periods of less than two months. Once such systems are identified, that'll provide many promising leads for follow-on studies with other instruments.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Apr 10 2013, 11:15 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 565
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



QUOTE (JRehling @ Apr 10 2013, 06:52 PM) *
And when you talk about hundreds of stars, you're no longer talking about "nearby."


You are, relatively: there are around 500 stars up to the 40 light year mark. That's practically next door.

Andy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vjkane
post Apr 11 2013, 02:54 AM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 22-April 05
Member No.: 351



Anyone know how TESS will identify transits since it will be scanning across the sky and most transits will occur outside the immediate field of view?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Apr 11 2013, 03:09 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1512
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



Some of TESS's targets will be closer, but the typical star observed will be a couple of hundred light years away.

It's an interesting question as to what the closest transiting planet is. Luck will figure large in that. There's no reason in principle why a very close one couldn't be, but the random orbital inclinations will bear whatever fruit they do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alphasam
post Apr 11 2013, 06:28 AM
Post #6


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 22-July 11
Member No.: 6080



QUOTE (vjkane @ Apr 11 2013, 03:54 AM) *
Anyone know how TESS will identify transits since it will be scanning across the sky and most transits will occur outside the immediate field of view?


If I remember correctly It will scan the same three fields in turn every 30 minutes (i.e ten minutes integration each) for a couple of months, giving it a slightly shorter measurement cadence than Kepler, and then it will move on to the next set of three fields and repeat.

Sadly this "Step and Stare" method means it will only be sensitive to short-period planets, ones close to their stars. It may be possible to detect temperate worlds around M-dwarfs though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Apr 15 2013, 10:17 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1512
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



While more knowledge is always (?) better, there are losses in completeness due to geometry and signal-to-noise even when monitoring is allowed to run longer.

A major contribution will be to identify which systems have inner planets that are aligned favorably. Those will merit follow-on observations to look for the rarer outer planets that are aligned favorably. It's useful as triage so a later mission might focus on a smaller number of systems.

Also, note that outer planets may still show single transits even during a very short period of observation, and so given large enough numbers, many outer planets will appear as candidates in the data, with more loosely-bound parameters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 05:50 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.