Pluto Colder Than It Should Be, SMA discovery |
Pluto Colder Than It Should Be, SMA discovery |
Jan 3 2006, 10:39 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 531 Joined: 24-August 05 Member No.: 471 |
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/press/pr0601.html - A Planet Colder Than It Should Be
--- Now, for the first time, Smithsonian astronomers using the Submillimeter Array (SMA) on Mauna Kea in Hawaii have taken direct measurements of thermal heat from both worlds and found that Pluto is indeed colder than expected, colder even than Charon. It found that the temperature of the ice-covered surface of Pluto was about 43 K instead of the expected 53 K, as on nearby Charon. --- -------------------- - blue_scape / Nico -
|
|
|
Jan 4 2006, 01:59 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 529 Joined: 19-February 05 Member No.: 173 |
QUOTE (SigurRosFan @ Jan 3 2006, 10:39 PM) http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/press/pr0601.html - A Planet Colder Than It Should Be --- Now, for the first time, Smithsonian astronomers using the Submillimeter Array (SMA) on Mauna Kea in Hawaii have taken direct measurements of thermal heat from both worlds and found that Pluto is indeed colder than expected, colder even than Charon. It found that the temperature of the ice-covered surface of Pluto was about 43 K instead of the expected 53 K, as on nearby Charon. --- Sorry sports fans, but this is almost all hype. The same result was published in the mid-1990s by three separate teams (Jewitt 1994 in AJ; Stern et al. 1993 in Science, and Tryka et al. 1993, in Icarus as I recall), each using different instruments. The cooling is due to latent heat sinks owing to N2 sublimation. which of course doesn't apply on Charon. ISO followed up on this in the late 1990s and confirmed it in a powerful way (Lellouch et al. ~2000). The only thing new here is that Charon has been removed from the modeling by SMA. Nice, but no headliner. Charon contributes only about 25% of the signal. -Alan |
|
|
Jan 4 2006, 06:31 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 87 Joined: 19-June 05 Member No.: 415 |
QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Jan 3 2006, 07:59 PM) Sorry sports fans, but this is almost all hype. The same result was published in the mid-1990s by three separate teams (Jewitt 1994 in AJ; Stern et al. 1993 in Science, and Tryka et al. 1993, in Icarus as I recall)... Pluto's temperature of ~40K is just one of the many Pluto facts that has been in the New Horizons Press Kit and several other presentations on the New Horizons web site. As he says, old news. A nice demonstration for the SMA, but not news. [Edited] That said, being as this is newer data, does this say anything about the thermal kinetics of Pluto? Does it help in deteriming the state of the atmosphere or predicting the future state? As the colder temperature is caused by sublimation, is the temperature a lagging indicator of the atmosphere? |
|
|
Jan 4 2006, 08:44 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Sounds like Harvard PAO went on an ESA 'claim something we already know' press release writing course.
Doug |
|
|
Jan 4 2006, 11:30 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 4 2006, 09:44 AM) Sounds like Harvard PAO went on an ESA 'claim something we already know' press release writing course. I look at it another way. Perhaps press releases like that are more common out there than you think and ESA is just one case of them. You simply decided to bash ESA more than anyone else -------------------- |
|
|
Jan 4 2006, 12:00 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 4 2006, 11:30 AM) Perhaps press releases like that are more common out there than you think Not really - NASA press releases can be a bit 'hollywood' - but they dont tend to lay claim to something that's already been investigated. Doug |
|
|
Jan 4 2006, 12:13 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Nobody's talking about NASA. There are other institutions in the world that also do press releases. While it's nice NASA press releases tend to be pretty good/accurate, they may very well be an oddball in the whole PR business. As someone already said, you can't really set NASA as a reference point.
It'd be nice, but we're just not there yet. That's not to say ESA should be excused for their admittedly sloppy PR work. The fact is we may have been spoiled by NASAs PR work and have come to expect the same from everyone else. Anyway, it's probably a bad idea to go down this road (yet) again... -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 12:18 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |