IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

19 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dawn's Survey Orbit at Ceres
climber
post Jul 22 2015, 08:59 AM
Post #226


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jul 22 2015, 09:29 AM) *
when Dawn gets down to the Mapping Orbits.

--Bill

She was supposed to start on July 15th but was kind enough to let NH show happen.
Do you all realise that we have now exploring 3 active worlds at the same Time?
Go Dawn, go NH, go Rosetta (and wake up Philae).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DFinfrock
post Jul 22 2015, 12:55 PM
Post #227


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 20-September 05
From: North Texas
Member No.: 503



Climber, Mars is active too.
Global dust storms, dust devils, lower-speed wind transport and erosion, gully features in some craters, sublimation and deposition of CO2 in polar terrain, just to mention a few.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Jul 22 2015, 01:42 PM
Post #228


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



And Cassini.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 22 2015, 01:43 PM
Post #229


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (DFinfrock @ Jul 22 2015, 02:55 PM) *
Climber, Mars is active too.
Global dust storms, dust devils, lower-speed wind transport and erosion, gully features in some craters, sublimation and deposition of CO2 in polar terrain, just to mention a few.

You're right...but not as active as UNMSF those weeks laugh.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZLD
post Jul 22 2015, 02:13 PM
Post #230


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 555
Joined: 27-September 10
Member No.: 5458



Well this is exciting. 'Active' is an interesting world choice. Does sublimation get counted as an active event in all cases? I would say that if a low velocity, icy impactor were to leave fractured chunks and began sublimating away, this would not constitute an active event. However, if the sublimation is present within the surface and is modifying the terrain, this could be then considered an active event.

Four big questions pop out at me with this news:

-If Occator is a location for active sublimation, where did the ice come from?

-If Occator is a location for active sublimation, with hundreds of larger and smaller white spots that may be related, why is Occator possibly the only active region among them?

-If Occator is a location for active sublimation, what role does the white material play in the sublimation?

-If Occator is a location for active sublimation, does local or global transport exist?

Really wish we were getting the same type of regular science updates with Dawn that we have been getting with NH. Dawn is just as interesting but the teams public outreach efforts seem to be night and day almost.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Jul 22 2015, 02:40 PM
Post #231


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



It has to be more complex than just ice and sublimation.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jul 22 2015, 03:31 PM
Post #232


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



All right, so, if they are seeing hazes over Occator at mid-day, where are the images that show this phenomenon? Will they be embargoed until someone can have a paper published about it? huh.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wildespace
post Jul 22 2015, 03:35 PM
Post #233


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: 15-January 13
Member No.: 6842



Hmm, could it be underground salty water rising to the surface and evaporating, leaving the bright salt deposits?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZLD
post Jul 22 2015, 03:58 PM
Post #234


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 555
Joined: 27-September 10
Member No.: 5458



I tried cleaning up the projected image of Occator.

Attached Image


QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jul 22 2015, 09:31 AM) *
Will they be embargoed until someone can have a paper published about it?


It seems this way from the lack of scientific news coming from the mission.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jul 22 2015, 04:08 PM
Post #235


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



The Chris Russell talk is now available here (hat tip to nasaspaceflight.com user leovinus)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ZLD
post Jul 22 2015, 06:10 PM
Post #236


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 555
Joined: 27-September 10
Member No.: 5458



A while back I posted a highly processed closeup of Occator. Here is a much updated, reprocessed version of that, overlayed with the projected image.

Attached Image


Attached Image


Attached Image

(click to animate)

Ok, so if this method holds any water (haha...) I'm seeing what could be multiple cryovolcanoes near the brightest spot. It still isn't clear why there is other multiple much brighter spots. It would be exceedingly useful if the team could take another fast shutter image so the nature of the thin wispy streaks, could be determined (plumes or lava).

----------
Edit
----------
Here is another blink with the source data.

Attached Image

(click to animate)

Really looks like theres a caldera near the upper right that has some kind of wispy trail that may be up away from the surface. Not sure what we would exactly be looking for in a sublimation event on a body like Ceres but this looks like a good chunk of shiny ice in this pit.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Habukaz
post Jul 22 2015, 06:12 PM
Post #237


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 423
Joined: 13-November 14
From: Norway
Member No.: 7310



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jul 22 2015, 06:08 PM) *
The Chris Russell talk is now available here (hat tip to nasaspaceflight.com user leovinus)



So Russell actually suggests the haze could be caused by sublimation ("largest comet in the asteroid belt"); but also says the bright spots were not created by impacts? Getting a bit confusing.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Steve5304_*
post Jul 26 2015, 08:46 PM
Post #238





Guests






Any news on hamo. When do we expect the first survey?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Jul 26 2015, 09:29 PM
Post #239


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



I'm starting my work in the Ceres Spots, beginning with Spot 5, Occator Crater:

https://univ.smugmug.com/Dawn-Mission/Ceres...t5-Enh-d-X2.png

It will be interesting to see this resolved during the HAMO and LAMO phases of the mission. This is much akin to the TLPs (Transient Lunar Phenomena) studied in the '60's which were as controversial as the impact vs volcanic origins of lunar craters.

Info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transient_lunar_phenomenon

or Google "transient lunar phenomena" or "aristarchus lights" for more. Warning, it gets strange.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herobrine
post Jul 27 2015, 05:33 PM
Post #240


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 244
Joined: 2-March 15
Member No.: 7408



While we're waiting for HAMO, I thought I'd make a preview of what we can expect to see at HAMO and LAMO.
At the top are 3 frames from the survey orbit (originally 1024x1024). The middle row shows the spots from the frame above at their HAMO-equivalent scale. The bottom row shows the same spots at their LAMO-equivalent scale.
Attached Image

All images are shown at 25% actual image size.
I feel like this may have already been done before, and I didn't check through the forum, so my apologies if this is redundant.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

19 Pages V  « < 14 15 16 17 18 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 06:03 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.