IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

67 Pages V  « < 33 34 35 36 37 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Exploring Mt Sharp north of the dunes - Part 1: Beyond Pahrump Hills, Site 45-50, Sol 923-1147, March 12-October 28, 2015
atomoid
post Jul 1 2015, 10:46 PM
Post #511


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



some interesting crosseyes from sol1031 MAHLI, sol1030 Navcams showing the 'mud pie' slice and poorly-debayered sol1003/1027 closeup
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 2 2015, 06:07 AM
Post #512


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



USGS Curiosity Mission Update - Sol 1032: Lots of Contact Science, by Ryan Anderson LINK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 2 2015, 06:44 AM
Post #513


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



The geological contact zone at Missoula in this cropped MAHLI mosaic.

It appears that the lower unit (mudstone?) is not as resistant to erosion, when compared with the upper unit (coarse sandstone) at this location
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 2 2015, 07:20 AM
Post #514


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Jul 2 2015, 02:44 AM) *
The geological contact zone at Missoula in this cropped MAHLI mosaic...
There seems to be a duplication of features in the area circled.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 2 2015, 08:32 AM
Post #515


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Jul 2 2015, 03:20 PM) *
There seems to be a duplication of features in the area circled.

Thanks, I missed that... smile.gif I used MS ICE, will try again and see if I can get it to stitch correctly.
EDIT
I was saved by the focused merged images that have since been down-linked, I hope these have been better stitched. Clicking the image will open the 1024x573 version.

If I am interpreting the thumbnails correctly they used 16 separate images to create each the focus merged products. It's the most I have ever noticed, normally we see 8. Thanks to Gerald for the MAHLI Rule.

Full size (3801 x 2126) LINK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MrNatural
post Jul 2 2015, 12:51 PM
Post #516


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 19-October 12
Member No.: 6719



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Jun 30 2015, 05:29 AM) *
A small mosaic using 3 focus stacked MAHLI images of "Big Arm" using white LED lighting on sol 1028 (June 28, 2015)


The target is mentioned in this USGS Mission Update from Lauren Edgar : Sol 1030: Bumping to Missoula


I don't know about the rest of you, but I found this MAHLI set of images to be rather extraordinary. Would a geologist care to comment on this? To my untrained eye, it appears to be rounded (stream-borne?) gravels deposited in what appears to be in a loosely sorted out-wash area. Obviously these gravels have been seen earlier in the MSL trip to Mt Sharp, but this appears to be another example, or am I wrong?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorithm
post Jul 2 2015, 01:13 PM
Post #517


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 11-December 12
From: The home of Corby Crater (Corby-England)
Member No.: 6783



A NavCam anaglyph from sol 1030


Attached Image




Worth a zoom or two for the wafer thin overhanging rocks. It's like they're in competition to see who can overhang the furthest before breaking off. laugh.gif

"Just...a.....little.......further!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
acastillo
post Jul 2 2015, 04:48 PM
Post #518


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 6-September 12
From: Denver
Member No.: 6641



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Jul 2 2015, 02:32 AM) *
If I am interpreting the thumbnails correctly they used 16 separate images to create each the focus merged products. It's the most I have ever noticed, normally we see 8. Thanks to Gerald for the MAHLI Rule. Full size (3801 x 2126) LINK


Beautiful contact! It does not look like an unconformity. It is not obvious to me that any erosion took place between the deposition of the different rock units. However, since the lower unit has substantial veining, and the upper unit does not, there would appear to be a significant change in deposition environment and probably a significant age difference.

I love speculating geology from a 100 million kilometers away.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 3 2015, 01:15 AM
Post #519


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



USGS Curiosity Mission Update, Sol 1033-1036 Independence Day Planning, from Ryan Anderson LINK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jul 3 2015, 06:16 AM
Post #520


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2824
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L panoramic view stitched together from images taken on Sol 1030 and Sol 1032.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 3 2015, 09:26 AM
Post #521


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Rough and Ready anaglyph of "Steeley", a rock damaged by the rovers wheels, Sol 1032.

Full size: LINK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 3 2015, 10:33 AM
Post #522


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Jul 2 2015, 06:44 AM) *
...It appears that the lower unit (mudstone?) is not as resistant to erosion, when compared with the upper unit (coarse sandstone) at this location


That seems possible. If the veins are an indication of hydrofracturing then their termination could be due to a change in the lithology (mechanical properties) of the overlying layer. If so then there may have been no great time between the deposition of the two layers with the veining a product of a later event from a deeper reservoir.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 3 2015, 07:34 PM
Post #523


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10159
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Jan's panorama in circular format to show where we are.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 4 2015, 08:18 AM
Post #524


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



RMI of one of the heavily sculpted laminations, shown in context with its MastCam image, both acquired on sol 1032 (July 2, 2015)

Edit: typo in image text corrected
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zelenyikot
post Jul 5 2015, 04:40 PM
Post #525


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Joined: 23-October 12
From: Russia
Member No.: 6725



Solar eclipce and solar spots at Sol 1032. (Solar spots from SDO at June 20).
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 


--------------------
My blog on Patreon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

67 Pages V  « < 33 34 35 36 37 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th May 2024 - 10:22 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.