IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

26 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The West Valley Route
alan
post Mar 30 2009, 12:18 AM
Post #106


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1620
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Some views of the potential Tarturi
from sol 758
Attached Image

and from sol 1374
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Mar 30 2009, 12:26 AM
Post #107


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1620
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



And a look ahead to the other side of West Valley and the path to von Braun
Attached Image


ETA: from sol 1350
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RoverDriver
post Mar 30 2009, 03:10 AM
Post #108


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 760
Joined: 29-September 06
From: Pasadena, CA - USA
Member No.: 1200



QUOTE (Astro0 @ Mar 29 2009, 03:14 PM) *
...
Tartarus Warning!!!! huh.gif Maybe not, but this is going to present some interesting times for the MER Precision Driving Team.


Yep. I think the 20+ meter drives are a thing of the past. We'll see where and how far we can go now. Keep your eyes peeled.

Paolo


--------------------
Disclaimer: all opinions, ideas and information included here are my own,and should not be intended to represent opinion or policy of my employer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Mar 30 2009, 05:48 AM
Post #109


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



...peeled and perspicacious, Paolo! rolleyes.gif
Unless we spot some dusty puddles in our path, I'd say we should just brush the edge of the HP talus exposures with our 'easterly wheels' (starboard side?). There the fine sediments should be shallowest - least likely to swallow us up ohmy.gif - and keep us close to the HP strata we want to study. Of course, it's possible that some PIs will want to plow up the deep sand in the middle of West Valley looking for 'delicious siliceous deposits'. (De gustibus non disputandum est.)
But if we get bogged down, we should all be allowed to say "We told you so!" cool.gif


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Mar 30 2009, 06:19 AM
Post #110


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 2419
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Marked in red, a best estimate of the Sol1861 rover position. Any takers?
Attached Image


Astro0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geert
post Mar 30 2009, 07:05 AM
Post #111


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 5-June 08
From: Udon Thani
Member No.: 4185



QUOTE (RoverDriver @ Mar 30 2009, 10:10 AM) *
Keep your eyes peeled.


Attached Image


This is about the closest I can get while still convincing myself that I'm not only tracking garbage.

Above image is made by combining 2 HiRISE images (to as much as possible eliminate shadows and garbage) and then asking the computer to mark area's with similar average relative brightness and variance. Resolution is 12.5 cm/pixel and grid is 3 meters.

Note the colors do NOT have any meaning in themselves, they only mark area's which 'look' the same to the software, in other words colors mark areas which have the same average brightness and the same variance. Keep in mind that slopes will also result in differences in brightness, so an east-facing slope will often get a different color from a west-facing slope even if it is in fact the same 'sand'.

I think what we can say is that we have been driving on 'brown' and 'dark purple' without getting stuck, so that's probably okay, but there is some 'lightblue' ahead which we have never driven on with only a small strip of 'okay' brown passage. "Unknown" colors MIGHT be dangerous or at least require attention.

Attached Image


On a scale of 25 cm/pix but using the same color-set this is the remaining area from West Valley to VB/GD, once again colors are only used to mark terrain with the same average brightness and variance but have no meaning in themselves. In order to mark colors as 'dangerous' or 'safe' I would have to check all measured terrain with terrain where Spirit has been driving previously and them mark it with a value-indicator (more or less what Mike has been doing for Oppy on Meridiani) and even then you can only state something about 'known' terrain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Mar 30 2009, 07:47 AM
Post #112


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2126
Joined: 9-February 04
From: UK
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (alan @ Mar 28 2009, 11:09 PM) *
James, did you do a color 3D version of the West Valley Pan, sols 1366-1369?


No, just the 2D colour: http://www.nivnac.co.uk/mer/index.php/a1366

I'll try and do a 3D version as we are heading back that way. It was only taken using one filter with the right pancam so colour 3D will be tough, but at least it is R1 (blue) so it's not impossible.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Mar 30 2009, 08:03 AM
Post #113


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2126
Joined: 9-February 04
From: UK
Member No.: 16



Geert, I'm not sure that analysis shows meaningful differences in terrain. You seem to have ended up with a similar range of colours for both the terrain on top of HP and that surrounding it - something we know from ground truth to not be the case.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Mar 30 2009, 09:46 AM
Post #114


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13233
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Sorry Geert - I'm with James. Your analysis doesn't achieve anything when compared to ground-truth.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Mar 30 2009, 09:59 AM
Post #115


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1111
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Marseille - FR
Member No.: 678



Distant dust devils captured on Sol 1856 smile.gif

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geert
post Mar 30 2009, 11:00 AM
Post #116


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 5-June 08
From: Udon Thani
Member No.: 4185



QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 30 2009, 05:46 PM) *
Sorry Geert - I'm with James. Your analysis doesn't achieve anything when compared to ground-truth.


smile.gif
I was afraid of that myself also already, as mentioned earlier its almost impossible to do anything meaningful from orbital images at such small ranges, you end up chasing ghosts ;-)

The only truth will need to come from the eyes of the rover itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Mar 30 2009, 11:37 AM
Post #117


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Phew! It's not just me then! A few times I've looked at them and thought "But if that colour is meant to be rocky, how come it doesn't look rocky on the pictures?" then thought maybe I was just being dumb and missing something slap-across-the-face obvious or just not interpreting the images correctly. rolleyes.gif But for some time now I've been thinking that - and I mean absolutely no disrespect here to the people who spend so much time working so hard on making them - these "terrain mapping" images are now a little bit irrelevent, especially when it's stated that the colours don't actually represent any ground truth.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Mar 30 2009, 01:00 PM
Post #118


Forum Contributor
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (climber @ Mar 28 2009, 08:09 PM) *
I think I've found sol 743 weels tracks wheel.gif
Visible for a few meters before and after these two black rocks in the first 1/4 from the back of the picture a little bit on the right from the center. Agree?


By "back" do you mean bottem ? if so then thats the front ! right ?....lol. Took me a while to spot them, as I was looking in the wrong place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geert
post Mar 30 2009, 01:29 PM
Post #119


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 232
Joined: 5-June 08
From: Udon Thani
Member No.: 4185



QUOTE (Stu @ Mar 30 2009, 06:37 PM) *
these "terrain mapping" images are now a little bit irrelevent, especially when it's stated that the colours don't actually represent any ground truth.


Colors can only mean one position has the same relative brightness and the same variance as an other position with the same color, there is absolutely no way they can say anything more be course that information simply is not in the HiRISE data. CRISM and THEMIS tell you a LOT more about the surface, but both have a resolution which is far and far less then what we need here, so you can't use them in this case. I gave it a try to see if there was any way we could get any information from HiRISE when working on this small scale but I was already very skeptical about it, it was a nice exercise in chasing ghosts smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Mar 30 2009, 01:42 PM
Post #120


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (Geert @ Mar 30 2009, 01:29 PM) *
it was a nice exercise in chasing ghosts smile.gif


It was definitely worth a try, yep! Not taking anything away from the effort or intentions. I think we can leave those particular ghosts alone now tho, and just enjoy the spectacular real views smile.gif

Speaking of which, hoping we're soon going to get a second look at my very favourite martian rock, McKay (lower right), last seen around Sol 747...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

26 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 06:18 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.