IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

19 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
TEGA - Round 2
01101001
post Jul 30 2008, 09:39 PM
Post #106


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 101
Joined: 29-January 06
Member No.: 667



This should be enough for an oven run on samples with the ice sublimated out. (Sol 64, 1127 local time)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slinted
post Jul 31 2008, 05:05 AM
Post #107


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 468
Joined: 11-February 04
From: USA
Member No.: 21



Here's a color view from SSI taken around the same time on sol 64:

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Jul 31 2008, 05:52 AM
Post #108


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Animation of the sample dump.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Jul 31 2008, 06:03 AM
Post #109


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



Danged oven must be full by now!
Let's get cookin'!
wheel.gif


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
peter59
post Aug 7 2008, 10:10 PM
Post #110


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 568
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Silesia
Member No.: 299



It looks like .... loading oven #5 ??
Attached Image



--------------------
Free software for planetary science (including Cassini Image Viewer).
http://members.tripod.com/petermasek/marinerall.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Aug 7 2008, 10:15 PM
Post #111


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



The Tamu SSI site says tosol's (sol 72) tasks were "RR3 acquire, delivery, and site documentation; atmo and surface remote sensing"

RR3 must be a TEGA sample, but what is it?


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
01101001
post Aug 7 2008, 10:17 PM
Post #112


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 101
Joined: 29-January 06
Member No.: 667



QUOTE (akuo @ Aug 7 2008, 02:15 PM) *
RR3 must be a TEGA sample, but what is it?


My guess "Rosy Red 3". I don't recall a Rosy Red 2. But Snow White was imaged a lot this sol, and Rosy Red came from near Snow White (and went into the MECA). This is probably an attempt to take a suspect perchlorate sample cousin and look for more confirmation with TEGA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slinted
post Aug 7 2008, 11:16 PM
Post #113


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 468
Joined: 11-February 04
From: USA
Member No.: 21



Here's the color view of TEGA from sol 72 after delivery

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tanjent
post Aug 8 2008, 01:39 AM
Post #114


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 628



I don't know if the topic line here is broad enough to embrace speculation about alternative sample delivery mechanisms, but as I watch the tailings pile up around the TEGA doors, I can't help wondering if a vacuum cleaner could be devised to work in a low-pressure Mars environment. If so, some future mission might want to include one. Earthly vacuum cleaners do a pretty efficient job of delivering their dust and soil samples into the little paper bag - it would be nice if we had one up there we could just command to "suck this little patch of digging debris into oven number n". And when it wasn't doing science it could even clean up after itself.- keeping the lander deck photogenically neat and tidy. Discharging the vacuumed materials where they won't come back to contaminate future samples could pose a problem, but so far it doesn't look like the existing design handles that issue very well either. In science and engineering, elegant solutions usually look, well, elegant. What could be more elegant than a robot on Mars with housekeeping capabilities?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Aug 8 2008, 06:08 AM
Post #115


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



Looking at slinted's color image of the soil that has fallen on the top's of those doors, when those doors open, I cant help but think that is gonna just slide into the oven as a contaminate sample.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Aug 8 2008, 07:29 AM
Post #116


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (James Sorenson @ Aug 8 2008, 01:08 AM) *
...I cant help but think that is gonna just slide into the oven as a contaminate sample.

It does look like once the next oven opens, it will be hard to avoid having soil from the ridge slide into it.
Attached Image

http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?...949&cID=207
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bgarlick
post Aug 8 2008, 05:16 PM
Post #117


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 5-October 06
Member No.: 1227



Yes, it does appear that now *every* remaining oven has at least some soil perched above its door so that when it is opened some soil may fall in. Pure, controlled, TEGA sampling and testing no longer looks possible.

A vacuum was suggested, but what about a simple coring mechanism on the end of the arm for taking core samples of soil or ice and then delivering/extruding them into on-deck instruments precisely with no spill. Maybe in 20-20 hindsight such a simple mechanism may have worked better.

(The funnel shaped channel in the bottom of the scoop looks like it could have better directed sample delivery, but it does not seem to work because of the clumpyness. In dry powder-like simulants I am sure it does a fine job of precise sample delivery...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Aug 8 2008, 05:21 PM
Post #118


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (bgarlick @ Aug 8 2008, 09:16 AM) *
Maybe in 20-20 hindsight such a simple mechanism may have worked better.


Maybe it was proposed, evaluated and ruled out for any number of reasons already.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Aug 8 2008, 06:22 PM
Post #119


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (tanjent @ Aug 7 2008, 08:39 PM) *
And when it wasn't doing science it could even clean up after itself.- keeping the lander deck photogenically neat and tidy.


An early proposal:




--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Aug 8 2008, 11:56 PM
Post #120


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



Wouldn't it be simpler to devise something to blow the area clean after each experiment? Seems to me it'd be difficult to get suction in a near vacuum.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

19 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 02:04 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.