IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

85 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
InSight Surface Operations, 26 Nov 2018- 21 Dec 2022
Paolo
post Nov 30 2018, 05:34 PM
Post #91


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (Steve5304 @ Nov 30 2018, 06:21 PM) *
Will the material in the well get analyzed?


nope. the mission is about seismology and heat balance, not about chemistry
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Nov 30 2018, 06:31 PM
Post #92


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



Since I didn't see a clock, I put this together. Should be within a second or so until the next leap second.
https://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~lemmon/mars-nsyt.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Nov 30 2018, 07:20 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (Steve5304 @ Nov 30 2018, 12:21 PM) *
We have never drilled more than a scratch under the surface.


But trenching has been done.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 30 2018, 07:26 PM
Post #94


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10158
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



In my post on the second page of this thread I showed part of a HiRISE image in the area east of the target point, where I expected the lander to be. I have since learned that we are in fact west of the target, where the surface is a lot smoother than shown in that image. Can't be more specific now.

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Steve5304_*
post Nov 30 2018, 07:34 PM
Post #95





Guests






QUOTE (stevesliva @ Nov 30 2018, 07:20 PM) *
But trenching has been done.



yeah but not 16 feet.

That's pretty deep, we might get some surprises
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Nov 30 2018, 08:03 PM
Post #96


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 866
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



QUOTE (HSchirmer @ Nov 30 2018, 09:21 AM) *
You know, after reading that, deploying the seismometer first and then moving the probe around as a "thumper" to create a 3d
map of the underground location of the big rocks you need to avoid, isn't such a crazy idea after all...

I was actually wondering if the system was designed to be able to "reel-in" the mole by its scientific tether to try a different location in case it were to meet criteria for mission failure by hitting an unmovable rock at too shallow a depth, but cant seem to find any mention of that, and seems highly risky anyways.. but on the other hand, such seismic imaging should also be possible by tapping the ground at strategic points with the deployment arm's bucket, or perhaps most safely by simply dropping scoops of regolith, no?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Nov 30 2018, 08:04 PM
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (nprev @ Nov 29 2018, 05:04 AM) *
The location 'race' is interesting...

[deleted]


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Nov 30 2018, 08:07 PM
Post #98


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Whoa!


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Nov 30 2018, 08:21 PM
Post #99


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Nov 30 2018, 12:07 PM) *
Whoa!

Keep in mind that the landing ellipse was several CTX swaths wide, so missing wouldn't be that surprising.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Dec 1 2018, 12:41 AM
Post #100


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Insight breaks solar power producing record on Mars.

Mars New Home a Large Sandbox
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 1 2018, 01:18 AM
Post #101


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Big error on the graphic in that article, though; the Viking landers were nuclear-powered, not solar.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Dec 1 2018, 01:33 AM
Post #102


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (nprev @ Dec 1 2018, 01:18 AM) *
Big error on the graphic in that article, though; the Viking landers were nuclear-powered, not solar.


Well spotted biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 1 2018, 02:14 AM
Post #103


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (Deimos @ Dec 1 2018, 02:31 AM) *
Since I didn't see a clock, I put this together. Should be within a second or so until the next leap second.
https://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~lemmon/mars-nsyt.html

Neat... TQVM smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deimos
post Dec 1 2018, 02:28 AM
Post #104


Martian Photographer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-March 05
Member No.: 183



Still dusty on ICC, but coolness above: https://mars.nasa.gov/insight/multimedia/ra...mission=insight
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 1 2018, 02:37 AM
Post #105


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Is the ICC cover still on, then?


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

85 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th May 2024 - 07:53 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.