Rev 16 - Oct 2-21, 2005 - Telesto, Tethys, Dione D1, Dione-Telesto-Enceladus |
![]() ![]() |
Rev 16 - Oct 2-21, 2005 - Telesto, Tethys, Dione D1, Dione-Telesto-Enceladus |
Oct 9 2005, 08:46 PM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1061 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
How bright is Saturn-shine, compared to the normal sunshine?
How good of a picture can they get of the shadowed side under a full Saturn? -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2005, 09:30 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4041 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 8 2005, 08:55 PM) I remember reading somewhere that it could hold thirty-something images. -------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Oct 9 2005, 09:53 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Guests |
More like 100 images per recorder (or a little more; I'd have to recheck, but it's definitely over 100 each).
|
|
|
|
| Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Oct 9 2005, 09:53 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Guests |
Oh, excuse me; I thought you were referring to CASSINI'S recorders. Voyager's, I don't know about.
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 01:12 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4041 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
Does anyone know if the NT of Enceladus will be used? If it covers any "new" territory, it seems like a great opportunity. Also, repeat coverage for Enceladus is much more important than for a moon like Iapetus, since change detection is a priority.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 01:45 PM
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3534 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (tedstryk @ Oct 10 2005, 03:12 PM) Does anyone know if the NT of Enceladus will be used? If it covers any "new" territory, it seems like a great opportunity. Also, repeat coverage for Enceladus is much more important than for a moon like Iapetus, since change detection is a priority. Earlier in the thread I said: "While Cassini will make a fairly close non-targeted approach to Enceladus, from the recently released Dione flyby description I figure there aren't any Enceladus observations programmed. Instead, the spacecraft will be engaged in a rather lengthy data downlink session at the time of C/A to Enceladus." From 42 000 km, 74 deg phase, there is an opportunity for some pretty good ISS NA coverage, perhaps a 4x4 mosaic, but as I said, I don't believe any actual observations are planned... -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 01:54 PM
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3534 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Oct 9 2005, 11:53 PM) Well, if the figure for the 500 megabit (around 64 megabytes) Voyager recorder is true, IIRC the resolution of the Voyager ISS cameras is about 800x800 so that's about 640 kb per image. That would indeed turn out to be around 100 images max -- the advantage that Voyagers had over Cassini is that they could downlink new images in real time (at least during Jupiter and Saturn encounters) so the storage limit probably wasn't that big of an issue as is with Cassini. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 03:00 PM
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4041 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
Data Storage Subsystem
---------------------- The Digital Tape Recorder (DTR) was used to store data when real-time communications with Earth were either not possible or not scheduled. The DTR recorded data on eight tracks; rates were 115.2 kilobits per second (record only), 21.6 kilobits per second (playback only), and 7.2 kilobits per second (record and playback). Capacity of each track was 12 images or equivalent. My original figure was based on the Uranus encounter. I forgot that this was shared with the other instruments. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 03:07 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1510 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
QUOTE (jmknapp @ Oct 9 2005, 01:46 PM) How bright is Saturn-shine, compared to the normal sunshine? How good of a picture can they get of the shadowed side under a full Saturn? It depends on which moon, and which phase Saturn is in from the moon's perspective. To answer this question without doing any math, I can tell you that they got very good saturnshine images of Iapetus, so have no fears about Dione, which receives orders of magnitude more saturnshine. The downside is that closer moons mean higher relative velocity, and thus shorter exposure times, but the added luminance will surely make up for that. We should get great images. |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 03:09 PM
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1153 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
I really want the scan platform now.
Out of all the things to cut from the final design. |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2005, 03:23 PM
Post
#26
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3534 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (Decepticon @ Oct 10 2005, 05:09 PM) Look at the bright side, instrument pointing turned out to be more accurate and steady (Dr. Carolyn Porco described the spacecraft as a "tripod in space" Plus, it's one thing less to worry about getting stuck... -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 13 2005, 01:53 AM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1153 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 13 2005, 01:54 AM
Post
#28
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1153 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
I have NO WORDS!
|
|
|
|
Oct 13 2005, 02:13 AM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1153 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
Ahh here we go. http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...heQ=0&storedQ=0
|
|
|
|
Oct 13 2005, 02:13 AM
Post
#30
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1620 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 01:19 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|