mer photos |
mer photos |
Dec 18 2011, 09:48 AM
Post
#196
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Hats off, man! It's a beautiful piece of art, congrats!
And knowing about all the details you put on the model, I'm wondering if it may be perhaps the most detailed one ever done in the world... |
|
|
Dec 18 2011, 12:10 PM
Post
#197
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 200 Joined: 2-September 06 Member No.: 1097 |
Well, it IS the most detailed model, I can assure you
-------------------- |
|
|
Dec 18 2011, 06:30 PM
Post
#198
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
WOW!!!
I have just went through all your posts from the first one, and calculated that this MER 3D model was at least 1932 days in the making, although even in your very first post there were some parts finished. You can rarely see that kind of determination these days. Well, I would REALLY like to say something to describe what I think about this AWESOME piece of ART but my knowledge of English is just not enough good for that, so I will just settle for fantastic, beautiful, inspiring and wonderful. I can't wait to see what would it look like when finished. P.S. On the funny side......did you heard there is another even more complex rover currently en route to Mars? -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
Dec 18 2011, 07:02 PM
Post
#199
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 399 Joined: 28-August 07 From: San Francisco Member No.: 3511 |
I had a retrospective read through your posts too, it's great dedication to a goal, looking forward to the finishing touches....
-------------------- 'She drove until the wheels fell off...'
|
|
|
Dec 18 2011, 07:28 PM
Post
#200
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 753 Joined: 23-October 04 From: Greensboro, NC USA Member No.: 103 |
I suggest that for an even more complete rendition, you should model each atom of 57Co in the Mossbauer spectrometer and be able to watch them decay!
-------------------- Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com |
|
|
Dec 18 2011, 07:51 PM
Post
#201
|
||||
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 60 Joined: 1-August 06 From: Vienna, Austria Member No.: 1002 |
Scooterlord the new rear view render is stunning - even more things to ogle at!
As to the Pancam, you've modelled it superbly it's how it is shown mounted on Mer's RH side which is not quite right; the wiring connection should be below the lens on the RH. The LH side is perfect. Keep the Christmas presents coming!! [I should get out more!] |
|||
|
||||
Dec 18 2011, 09:22 PM
Post
#202
|
|
Chief Assistant Group: Admin Posts: 1409 Joined: 5-January 05 From: Ierapetra, Greece Member No.: 136 |
Woaw man, that's just
congratulations ! A lot of work paying off ! -------------------- photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.
http://500px.com/sacred-photons & |
|
|
Dec 19 2011, 12:03 AM
Post
#203
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 200 Joined: 2-September 06 Member No.: 1097 |
Scooterlord the new rear view render is stunning - even more things to ogle at! As to the Pancam, you've modelled it superbly ...it's how it is shown mounted on Mer's RH side which is not quite right; the wiring connection should be below the lens on the RH. The LH side is perfect.. Keep the Christmas presents coming!! [I should get out more!] That's just AMAZING! Isn't this some vision! Are you using x-rays? Well done, minor detail but you were right, I though you meant about the lens being on the same side, I'll have this fixed. I am glad that you people spent quite some time studying my model and I guess you will be amazed by the amount of detail I made out of the reference found on the web... Today I spent most of the day fixing 'bad surfaces' on the model, there were quite a few, had them all fixed though Currently I am doing test renders on the environment, it's very difficult to get a nice surface at the high resolutions I am aiming at, will post later to get some opinions.. edit: @Toma B... Yes, I saw the curiosity rover, but.. I don't think so! LOL. I don't have enough 'life' to model this as well... Unless NASA hires me to do so that is.. hehe This for me started as a fun modeling challenge to myself and it ended up eating up most of my brain thinking about every single day. Now, as I have already said, it will become the most important asset in my portfolio in order to get a job. I want to change professions, working at a hospital just isn't enough for me, and I am certain that you can see I am being wasted in there. Hopefully someone will notice and care to help.. edit2: Here are the render of the environment. They are big res files (3400x1996). What do you guys think? http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/4678/env2.jpg http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/5442/env3.jpg -------------------- |
|
|
Dec 19 2011, 06:30 AM
Post
#204
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
edit2: Here are the render of the environment. They are big res files (3400x1996). What do you guys think? Not bad, especially 1st one; hard to judge without a scale refer... in my opinion, in the 2nd image there is too much terrain glare! -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
Dec 19 2011, 05:33 PM
Post
#205
|
|
Director of Galilean Photography Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 15-July 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 93 |
Scooterlord, I stand in awe of your 3D abilities. I shall never open Blender again!
-------------------- Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
-- "The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality. |
|
|
Dec 19 2011, 09:17 PM
Post
#206
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 200 Joined: 2-September 06 Member No.: 1097 |
Well... you should! You should set this as your standard and get started! Everyone starts from nothing...
-------------------- |
|
|
Dec 20 2011, 10:45 AM
Post
#207
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 200 Joined: 2-September 06 Member No.: 1097 |
Good morning! New render with right-side view details:
http://img859.imageshack.us/img859/5401/merright.jpg Sorry I didn't have enough time to fix the pancam thingie, but will do so, I keep that in mind. For people into technical 3d stuff. This render, although is 5400x3173 (that is TWICE the size of the previous render), it only took half the time and this time consumed 5.5gb of ram. I had forgotten to turn export instances; for people that don't know (and care to know an instance is an object multiplied many times that is the same, like the photoboltaic mirrors, or the bolts, etc. It saved me a lot of time! I didn't mention it so far, but the most difficult and time-consuming part of the rover was making the cables and the threads that hold them together. I was bored a million of times and just pushed myself to making them... finally, you can even see the knots on the underside of the wings if you pay attention. Only in this size of renders can they be clearly seen. Expecting your comments, the next render might probably show up textured -------------------- |
|
|
Dec 20 2011, 03:00 PM
Post
#208
|
|
Director of Galilean Photography Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 15-July 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 93 |
Look absolutely beautiful. At some point, you will need to do a render with the camera moved a few inches to the left or right so someone here can create a 3D view.
-------------------- Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
-- "The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality. |
|
|
Dec 20 2011, 03:24 PM
Post
#209
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
I see the knots and lot of other amazing details, what a marvel! This vision recall me the high-res MER movie I saw in Paris years ago...
You say this rendering took half the time of previous one but... how much time, exactly? (well, I know this question should be coupled to "which kind of hardware/software?" but I know also the risk of going OT here, so pls don't be too technical on this side! ). Good suggestion from Hendric about 3D view... -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
Dec 20 2011, 03:46 PM
Post
#210
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 200 Joined: 2-September 06 Member No.: 1097 |
As soon as I am done, I can make a 3d view out of it. Damn it's just two renders..
This HUGE render took about 6 hours, I am using rhinoceros 3d beta 5 x64, maxwell render, and am on an Intel i7 960 @3.2Ghz (that is 4 core-8 hyperthreaded -considered like 8-core) with 6gb of ram dd3 triple channel (expecting 12gb soon). However, because I want the pc to be silent, I am using a program to limit the core usage to 75%, makes it run cool and silent However with materials it's another story, good thing I don't mind having the pc on and another good thing is that the renderer allows you to stop and resume the render whenever you want! Currently I am at work but checking on a material render of just the RAT (includes displacement) and it has run 6 hours so far at about 1200x6??. Looks a bit hazy, but I was in a rush when I started the render, so I might not have focused the camera correctly. Looks absolutely S T U N N I N G If I finish this later on tonight I'll post the render. -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 07:13 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |