http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/msl2009/workshops/2nd_workshop/2nd_announcement.html
October 23-25, 2007
Pasadena, CA
http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/msl2009/workshops/2nd_workshop/Second_Announcement_2nd_MSL_Workshop_8-24-07.doc (MS Word)
http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/msl2009/workshops/2nd_workshop/Information_to_Presenters.doc (MS Word)
Note also the two August 2007 updates for http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/msl/memoranda/MSL_Eng_User_Guide_v4.5.1.pdf.
Here's the program for the second landing site workshop (Word file). It should be very interesting.
Phil
http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/msl2009/workshops/2nd_workshop/2nd_MSL_Workshop_Program_10_3_07_1.doc
There's also a http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/msl2009/workshops/2nd_workshop/MSL_Criteria_Chart_1.doc they're going to use to sort out the science possibilities and safety issues for each site.
I'm planning on attending at least some of this meeting, but am not sure if I'll be able to go to the whole thing...
--Emily
I don't suppose there's any chance that all the sessions will be recorded and made available for download somewhere on the web?
I think it's safe to say there is absolutely zero chance of that.
--Emily
Emily...this is a bit off topic but...here it goes...
That last post of yours at the http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001183/ is quite something!!!
I will NEVER be able to do produce taht fine quality back at http://wwww.spaceurope.blogspot.com...
You will forever be a huge reference...Wow! I'm breathless...
algorimancer : " I don't suppose there's any chance that all the sessions will be recorded and made available for download somewhere on the web?"
elakdawalla : " I think it's safe to say there is absolutely zero chance of that."
I have to (sort of) disagree. Check out this link for the first workshop:
http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/msl/workshops/1st_workshop/program.html
It's very likely that we will get exactly the same for the second. Not a recording, but the next best thing.
Phil
Some http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/071010-msl-landing-sites.html juicy stuff...
We're getting closer...
http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/10/in-upcoming-week-from-23rd-to-25th-will.html (OMEGA's PI) will focus his presentation on three specific locations:
Mawrth Vallis, Nili Fossae and Meridiani.
He will try to convince the others that that geomorphological context is not sufficient enough for the choice of an MSL valuable site and that the choice must come also from additional mineralogical information (he gives emphasis to the phyllosilicates...).
I'll try to get something more from inside...
EDITED: Since I've invited Bibring to talk about what will he be doing at the workshop why not invite...everyone?
http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/10/as-you-might-have-read-yesterday-i-had.html (Gale Crater) and http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/10/today-at-speakers-corner-for-msls.html (East Meridiani) already showed up at this "gimme you best Mars!" kind of party, let's see if someone else follows them...
Horton Newsom is proposing a http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/10/horton-newsom-from-university-of-new.html at the workshop and he has just e-mailed me a http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s18/spacEurope/MSL_Horton_Newsom_NSL.jpg?t=1192723955...I especially like to imagine MSL roving along Adrian's Wall feature in the center...
The choice is going to be hard...
I am not at Pasadena but http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/10/at-pasadena-2nd-msl-landing-site.html is...
Among other things he tells us the following, regarding the evaluations of yesterday's sites:
"Eberswalde and Holden came out on top (beating Nili/Jezero crater by a single yellow vs green on preservation of biosignatures).
Ritchey and Gale crater were rated lower (all yellows).
It is worth noting that Eberswalde and Holden may be faced with a challenge regarding the thermal issue discussed earlier; and from my perspective, it seems likely that Eberswalde will eventually get eliminated on the inability to place a viable ellipse inside the crater."
The MEPAG site has added an interesting list of "Critical Data Products" for use in selecting the MSL landing site, at:
mepag.nasa.jpl.gov/cdp/index.html
These look like they should link to text and images, but don't. Hopefully, the links will be added soon, as MEPAG traditionally has open access to all of their reports, studies, etc.
Hi Tim! Stayed home today -- I figured I could get the highlights of the site-by-site discussions from someone else -- but I'll be back Thursday to witness the bitter end.
--Emily
Thursday will be the most dramatic!
See you tomorrow.
-Tim.
Presentations are being posted here:
http://hirise.seti.org/MSL_Landing_Sites/
At the outset of the meeting, the attendees were told that all presentations would be posted UNLESS speakers specifically requested that they not be. So you know who the "bad guys" are
EDIT: Here's a gem from the Watkins and Steltzner engineering constraints presentation (which is a monstrous 25 MB but is packed with interesting info): this image of the backshell was on a slide titled "We are big." No kidding.
The report from the second day of activities is http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/10/here-is-report-of-spaceuropes.html at spacEurope.
Looks like there is the the possibility of MSL may be sending our regards to Opportunity personally...
"After the layered deposits session, the next talks looked specifically at the region around Meridiani/MER-B (generally because of the possibility for safely landing in this area of Mars. Of particular interest to the audience were sites around the margin of the MER Opportunity stratigraphic stack where evidence for phyllosilicates have been observed. Often the only /geomorphic/ evidence for water having been there are inverted features, however, which makes arguments for clear habitable context difficult. Nonetheless, the votes from the audience seem to suggest to me that at least one of the Meridiani sites is likely to get through ("East Meridiani")."
They are big! I just wanted to say thank you very much to Emily for her great coverage of the workshop. I find them fascinating. I remember back to the MER workshops and Nathalie Cabrol's presentation which one me over to Gusev as the best landing site. I can't wait to have a look at the MSL suggestions.
Not sure if I support a Meridiani revisit at this point. Given that we are slowly coming to the realization that Mars may have far more mineralogical complexity than previously thought, seems that MSL's range capability would be best utilized in an area that has as many boundaries between different mineralogical regions as we can find, combined with favorable EDL conditions.
Gotta admit that the possibilty of examing Martian clays is exciting, though; their very existence sets the mind to reeling!
In my humble opinion, the phyllosilicates are a number one priority. These clays seem to be the only things that preserve traces of a Mars which differs significantly from the current planet.
They may have been formed as early as at the very end of the LHB, but these clays were formed before sulphuric acids began pouring out of the interior and the entire outer surface of the planet was coated with sulphates. This is likely the only period in the history of Mars when conditions were truly favorable for life to develop, and as such are most interesting to me. (It has always seemed to me that we need to study extraterrestrial life before we can truly understand how life actually works. Until then, we're stuck behind assumptions that we can't see beyond.)
There seems to be precious little of this phyllosilicate material exposed on the surface. The question is, was there not much to begin with? Or was it more ubiquitous but now has been covered with lavas and/or coated with basaltic dust cemented together by sulphate salts? Investigations of the clays, and of the contact between them and the surrounding terrains, will go a long way towards painting a picture of very early conditions on Mars.
Now, if Meridiani shows significant clay exposures, I'd be all for landing there. We already know how benign the surface conditions are, and how likely it'll be that we can land MSL there safely. But the more we can place clay exposures into a geologically significant context, the more we learn. I'm not positive how much context we'll be able to derive in such a flat location -- you'd be almost totally dependent on entering medium- to large-sized craters to get your drill holes into the stratigraphy.
I'd rather find places we can land safely and then approach outcrops on cliff faces and hillsides. Seems a little more likely to show us context. Of course, I could be wrong...
-the other Doug
Here are the final results from the workshop...the selected sites are...:
North:
Nili Fossae Trough
Mawrth
SW Meridiani/Clays
Jezero Crater
South:
Holden Crater
Terby Crater
In Purgatory...:
Eberswalde
NE Syrtis
Chloride Salts
E. Meridiani (Compelling Safe Haven)
No Gale That was my favorite.
Same as NH iirc, but minus one booster. The 5m Atlas V fairing. (an Atlas V 541 for MSL - 5m fairing, 4 boosters, 1 engine upper stage)
Doug
I have http://spaceurope.blogspot.com/2007/10/here-is-final-report-from-spaceuropes.html the final report from spacEurope's correspondant at Pasadena...how on Mars was I so lucky to get this guy's precious, and (volunteer!) collaboration?!
Couple of colourised-strictly-for-fun-not-suggesting-they're-accurate-or-anything sections of that beautiful Nili Fossae Trough image ustrax, to thank you for your excellent work on this discussion for those of us anable to follow it so closely
From my perspective, the workshop was a tremendous success. Narrowing more than 50 sites down to six was a sometimes painful process, but it was important for the scientific community to do that work so that the folks at the management level can focus on the most scientifically interesting places. The other option was that we give them a much longer list and the safest (and potentially most boring) place would be chosen because of engineering constraints.
A couple of interesting notes based on some previous comments: Each of the final six sites has exhibited the spectral signature of smectite clays in OMEGA or CRISM data (or both), although Nili Fossae Trough and Mawrth Vallis exhibit the deepest spectral features, which may correlate with abundance.
Holden and Terby came very close to not making the final list. They are both very interesting scientifically, but we were told by the engineers that because of their high southern latitudes and cold temperatures that if MSL landed at one of those sites it would have to lie dormant for the first month or so and then operate at only a 30-50% duty cycle. There was a lot of debate about whether the science that could be done at those sites outweighs those limitations. In the end it was a close vote, but both were kept on the final list.
The SW Meridiani site is very different from the MER B site at Meridiani Planum. It has been interpreted as a paleocrater lake and contains the spectral signature of smectite clays in visible/near-IR data. In addition, the TES and THEMIS data exhibit spectral character consistent with the presence of chloride salts.
Tim, one thing I wasn't clear on at the workshop was what the time frame over which MSL would have the 30% to 50% duty cycle. At some times it seemed they were talking about lengthy hibernation (several months of inactivity), at other times it seemed they were talking about limited operations within a sol (needing to allow time for the rover to warm up, like a lizard in the sun as one person put it). Which one was it, or was it both?
--Emily
About MSL's hibernation, I thought waste heat from the rover's RTG was to be transferred to a circulating fluid that would keep MSL critical systems warm at all times. Is the temperature of the southern sites too low even for this heating system, or am I in error about having active heating onboard?
Jezero is also a town in Bosnia-Herzegovina, according to USGS. Probably named for a nearby lake.
Phil
There are new details and maps for the six current MSL site candidates:
http://marsoweb.nas.nasa.gov/landingsites/index.html
Phil
My impression is that MSL is either less powered than originally concieved, uses more electricity than they expected, or something... We're getting "MSL Light" in a number of ways.
MSL has always had a 50% duty cycle. The RTG doesn't have enough power to permit constant roving. Anyways, roving in the dark is not a good thing to do and it would require more power than roving during the day. I haven't seen anything on a hibernation period at this point. I will make some inquires.
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)