IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

8 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Out The Crater.., on to the Heatshield
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Dec 13 2004, 12:34 AM
Post #16





Guests






Is this panorama intened to provide a record of Oppy's journey in the crater?

edit: LOTS of NavCam images coming down, a complete 360 by the look of it. Is this the pan they were planning to do or was that going to be with the panoramic camera?

.... some pancam subframes of the heatshield in, are we seeing features on the distant horizon here?



One of the better images, with slightly less pixel bleeding:

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mook
post Dec 13 2004, 01:34 AM
Post #17


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 11-June 04
Member No.: 81



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Dec 13 2004, 12:34 AM)
.... some pancam subframes of the heatshield in, are we seeing features on the distant horizon here?

I don't think so — or they would turn up on the other frames. I think it's just haze / out-of-focus horizon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Dec 13 2004, 02:30 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



I was kind of looking forward to looking back down and seeing the tracks of where Opportunity travelled inside the crater. But apparently the perspective is not good from the current location. Do you suppose they might move her to a different location on the rim before doing the panorama?


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Dec 13 2004, 03:13 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Dec 12 2004, 06:34 PM)
.... some pancam subframes of the heatshield in, are we seeing features on the distant horizon here?

I think that is pretty much the same horizon in all the subframes. It is just less distinct in the L3 (red) than it is in the L5 (green) filter. The distant surface is more reflective in the L3 than it is in the L5, too.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 13 2004, 09:04 AM
Post #20


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Dec 13 2004, 02:30 AM)
I was kind of looking forward to looking back down and seeing the tracks of where Opportunity travelled inside the crater.  But apparently the perspective is not good from the current location.  Do you suppose they might move her to a different location on the rim before doing the panorama?

Looks to me like they've done it - a full NAVcam panorama. Not Pancam. No point in another 3 sols of UHF being lost to the third colour panorama of Endurence crater.

And yes - I see no reason why one wavelength wouldnt spot the etched terrain off in the distance and bring it out very brightly - it shows up - like most rock in the area - very bright in the UV.


Might we be seing that feature even from this distance?


1m/pixel of the next few sols driving.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Dec 13 2004, 01:40 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



Those distant features were well spotted. I guess the atmosphere around meridiani has cleared during the last 5-6 months. Oppy had a very limited visibility inside the crater :-).

I think a partial pancam panorama would be useful at this moment. They did one when leaving the Eagle crater to record the adventures there. Also they are probably now in the highest position around the plains that they will be in some time. It would be worth it to do a panorama at least around the horizon to see if anything else has come up through the haze.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 13 2004, 02:07 PM
Post #22


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (akuo @ Dec 13 2004, 01:40 PM)
Those distant features were well spotted. I guess the atmosphere around meridiani has cleared during the last 5-6 months. Oppy had a very limited visibility inside the crater :-).

I think a partial pancam panorama would be useful at this moment. They did one when leaving the Eagle crater to record the adventures there. Also they are probably now in the highest position around the plains that they will be in some time. It would be worth it to do a panorama at least around the horizon to see if anything else has come up through the haze.

Well - when comms conditions are not great - shifting >200Mbits of data just for pretty pictures isnt too good an idea smile.gif

I'm sure a full pancam panorama will follow when we get to the heatshield - and if there's anything to be seen on the horizon ( which they're probably wont ) - it'll be seen from there as clearly as it would have been from a couple of metres higher on the rim of Endurance. We can see from the pancam pics taken yesterday that looking toward the Heatshield - there's nothing you can see in the distance really.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Dec 13 2004, 02:50 PM
Post #23


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



It is too bad they don't take a full resolution pan in one color, and then bin two more colors 2x2 or even 4x4...sort of Galileo style color. Or even a red-blue pan with synthetic green. This would give us a high resolution pan to study, as well as color data on a broad scale.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Dec 13 2004, 03:12 PM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Dec 13 2004, 02:50 PM)
It is too bad they don't take a full resolution pan in one color, and then bin two more colors 2x2 or even 4x4...sort of Galileo style color.  Or even a red-blue pan with synthetic green.  This would give us a high resolution pan to study, as well as color data on a broad scale.


They use adjustable compression of images in the rovers. By using sufficiently high compression, they can get the same size reduction as with binning. For example some of the navcam images from friday (I think) were very compressed. Pancam images are quite often compressed quite a lot. Image scaling to half-size has been also used, but mostly for hazcams and navcams.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Dec 13 2004, 03:42 PM
Post #25


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Yes, but combined with binning they could make the images even smaller. They could still be used to produce a rough color view to overlay over full resolution images.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Dec 13 2004, 03:43 PM
Post #26


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



They did that a LOT early on - infact, for both rovers the mission success pan from the lander base was done with L2 at full res and L5 and L6 2x2 binned

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pioneer
post Dec 13 2004, 04:28 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 8-June 04
Member No.: 80



How far away is the heatshield?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Dec 13 2004, 05:01 PM
Post #28


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



I wonder why they cut back. It would seem that it would be a good way to expand basic color coverage.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
azstrummer
post Dec 13 2004, 05:02 PM
Post #29


Rover Driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 109
Joined: 2-May 04
From: Litchfield Park, Arizona (Phoenix area)
Member No.: 71



Why the need for a pan? My word, they did tons of panning prior to heading down into the crater. Doubt much has changed. Anyway, great news it got out successfully. Time to go for a record a day on distance traveled.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Dec 13 2004, 05:07 PM
Post #30


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Perhaps for "Before and After" coverage showing the wheel tracks in the crater. At the very least it would be a good publicity stunt.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th June 2024 - 10:11 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.