IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MAVEN Orbital Science, Post Siding Spring
bobik
post Mar 4 2017, 07:55 AM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 257
Joined: 28-October 12
Member No.: 6732



I must confess that this press release sounds a little bit hyped-up to me. huh.gif Flybys at Phobos of Mars Express are known and science investigations are planned months in advance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 4 2017, 08:42 AM
Post #17


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Perhaps a bit. It certainly seems like it's getting a fair amount of attention from the world press. However, I can also see why they might want that, and it's an interesting story in its own right for people who do not ordinarily pay much attention to robotic spaceflight. smile.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Mar 4 2017, 05:56 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1278
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Are any science observations being done by Maven?

The article doesn't state if it will?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Mar 4 2017, 06:45 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2113
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



It was observed in ultraviolet in December 2015, 500 kilometres away: http://mars.nasa.gov/news/2016/maven-obser...far-ultraviolet

Not sure if they'll do any new measurements this time; how far will this flyby be in distance?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 4 2017, 07:29 PM
Post #20


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8789
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Not sure. Phobos' orbital velocity is a bit more than 2.1 km/sec, and the press release says that the avoidance maneuver allows MAVEN to miss the intersect point by 2.5 min so...minimum 315 km? That doesn't account for MAVEN's own velocity at this point in its elliptical orbit, though.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Sep 21 2018, 05:52 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



MAVEN Selfie Marks Four Years in Orbit at Mars

I seem to remember there was a topic about spacecraft selfies, but I can't find it anymore
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 9 2021, 08:46 AM
Post #22


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10256
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Poor old MAVEN doesn't get much love here, because it doesn't produce images. Except when it does. Here's a great new one from the IUVS instrument.

https://lasp.colorado.edu/home/maven/2021/1...card-from-mars/

And see more here:

https://lasp.colorado.edu/home/maven/scienc...ing-highlights/

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Feb 18 2022, 02:57 AM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



After hunting down the Ingenuity presentation on Day 1 of the recent MPEAG meeting, I started listening to a lively MAVEN presentation by PI Shannon Curry. The video is on this page,  https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/meetings.cfm, and her presentation starts at about 3:15. Really interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Jun 2 2022, 01:33 AM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1453
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



Apparently we almost lost the mission due to an IMU failure.
https://www.space.com/nasa-mars-spacecraft-maven-nearly-lost


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bobik
post Jun 4 2022, 09:41 AM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 257
Joined: 28-October 12
Member No.: 6732



They surely took their time to tell the general public about the spacecraft's technical problems. huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jun 4 2022, 04:54 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2547
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Hungry4info @ Jun 1 2022, 06:33 PM) *
Apparently we almost lost the mission due to an IMU failure.

I have no inside knowledge about this, but I suspect that the media reports have been somewhat modulated for dramatic effect.

IMU problems and subsequent use of all-stellar mode is pretty old news. See "Verification of Mars Odyssey All-Stellar Attitude Determination Ten Years After Launch", Gingerich et al, 2015, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7119001 (paywalled, but available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30...rs_after_launch )

The wrinkle for MAVEN was that they had some failures that required some ground-commanded manipulation of onboard redundancy. On previous missions, the transition to all-stellar could be done in a more leisurely and measured fashion.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jun 4 2022, 04:54 PM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2113
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



MAVEN is not like a lander with regular releases of imagery, so it's much easier to conceal issues; I think that because the spacecraft was quickly saved, but then had to spend a lot of time finding new ways to operate and maintain attitude before science could begin, media attention would not have been very useful. Though we are only speculating on why it was hush-hush for so long.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jun 4 2022, 05:17 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2547
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ Jun 4 2022, 08:54 AM) *
Though we are only speculating on why it was hush-hush for so long.

FWIW this was mentioned in the MEPAG report from about a month ago. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/mepag/meetings/mep...anson_Meyer.pdf slide 6.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:17 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.