New Olympus Mons image, 6 km high scarp |
New Olympus Mons image, 6 km high scarp |
Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
Mar 6 2006, 07:29 PM
Post
#16
|
Guests |
Googling ""Olympus Mons Aureole" (with the "") gives a wealth of info on the aureole terrains. most people seems to think they are indeed landslides. But if so, why they cut so preciselly the contour of the volcano? Perhaps at a precise distance of the main crater; the lava flows were cooler, and thus they constructed a less cohesive terrain, landlide prone, where the central terrain is not.
I especially select this one give extensive details about the evidences of landslides, and how they could have occured, and why they follow the contour of the volcano. |
|
|
May 10 2006, 05:47 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
This image of an area near Olympus Mons reminds me of some of the
images of Io taken by Galileo: http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2006/05/07/ -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
May 10 2006, 06:26 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
May 10 2006, 07:05 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10150 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Nice one, Doug - look at the cloud shadows! If the sun elevation is known the cloud height can be calculated.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
May 10 2006, 07:12 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Unfortunately, ESA being ESA - they've not gone that far....
CODE /* FILE DATA ELEMENTS */
RECORD_TYPE = FIXED_LENGTH RECORD_BYTES = 761 FILE_RECORDS = 9093 LABEL_RECORDS = 13 /* POINTERS TO DATA OBJECTS */ ^IMAGE_HEADER = 14 ^IMAGE = 24 /* IDENTIFICATION DATA ELEMENTS */ FILE_NAME = "H1089_0000_GR3.IMG" DATA_SET_ID = "MEX-M-HRSC-5-REFDR-MAPPROJECTED-V1.0" DETECTOR_ID = MEX_HRSC_GREEN EVENT_TYPE = "MARS-REGIONAL-STEREO-Vo-Te" INSTRUMENT_HOST_ID = MEX INSTRUMENT_HOST_NAME = "MARS EXPRESS" INSTRUMENT_ID = HRSC INSTRUMENT_NAME = "HIGH RESOLUTION STEREO CAMERA" MISSION_NAME = "MARS EXPRESS" MISSION_PHASE_NAME = MR_Phase_3 PROCESSING_LEVEL_ID = 3 PRODUCT_CREATION_TIME = 2006-02-25T19:37:42.000Z PRODUCT_ID = "H1089_0000_GR3.IMG" RELEASE_ID = 0014 REVISION_ID = 0000 /* TIME DATA ELEMENTS */ SPACECRAFT_CLOCK_START_COUNT = "1/0049306128.57946" SPACECRAFT_CLOCK_STOP_COUNT = "1/0049306423.01508" START_TIME = 2004-11-23T16:09:25.323Z STOP_TIME = 2004-11-23T16:13:19.412Z /* ORBITAL DATA ELEMENTS */ ASCENDING_NODE_LONGITUDE = 205.87 MAXIMUM_RESOLUTION = 90.9 <m/pixel> FOOTPRINT_POINT_LATITUDE = (27.9346,27.9344,27.9342,27.933,27.9328 ,27.9316,27.9314,27.9301,27.9299, 27.9286,27.9283,27.9269,27.9266,27.9252 ,27.9247,27.9234,27.9231,27.9228, 27.9215,27.921,27.9196,27.919,27.9167, 27.9164,27.9134,27.913,27.9111,27.9107, 27.9088,27.9084,27.9067,27.9064,27.9044 ,27.7339,27.5671,27.4003,26.8988, 26.7313,26.2345,25.9094,25.7463,25.5834 ,22.5711,22.417,22.1085,21.7999,21.4907 ,21.3364,21.1872,21.0395,20.8898, 20.7401,20.5905,20.4405,20.2907,19.9912 ,19.8414,19.5414,19.3913,19.0908, 18.9434,18.7981,18.508,18.3624,18.217, 18.0725,17.9272,17.6366,17.4909,17.3452 ,17.1992,17.0528,16.9066,16.7605, 16.6142,16.4681,16.3218,16.0295,15.8825 ,15.7404,15.5991,15.4583,15.3155, 15.1743,14.7515,13.7638,13.0574,12.6363 ,12.6364,12.6373,12.6375,12.6378,12.638 ,12.6423,12.6424,12.6449,12.6464, 12.6465,12.648,27.9346) FOOTPRINT_POINT_LONGITUDE = (231.495,231.482,231.469,231.392, 231.379,231.301,231.288,231.21,231.197, 231.119,231.106,231.028,231.015,230.936 ,230.909,230.844,230.831,230.817, 230.751,230.725,230.659,230.632,230.526 ,230.512,230.379,230.365,230.285, 230.271,230.19,230.176,230.109,230.095, 230.088,230.096,230.103,230.11,230.13, 230.136,230.156,230.169,230.174,230.18, 230.279,230.284,230.294,230.304,230.313 ,230.319,230.325,230.336,230.34,230.344 ,230.348,230.351,230.356,230.365,230.37 ,230.379,230.383,230.39,230.393,230.396 ,230.403,230.405,230.407,230.414, 230.418,230.425,230.427,230.43,230.431, 230.431,230.432,230.433,230.434,230.435 ,230.436,230.44,230.438,230.434,230.434 ,230.436,230.429,230.43,230.435,230.446 ,230.452,230.456,230.464,230.543, 230.553,230.583,230.593,231.0,231.009, 231.285,231.462,231.472,231.478, 231.495) ORBIT_NUMBER = 1089 ORBITAL_ECCENTRICITY = 0.574 ORBITAL_INCLINATION = 86.59 ORBITAL_SEMIMAJOR_AXIS = 8632.71 PERIAPSIS_ALTITUDE = 282.96 PERIAPSIS_ARGUMENT_ANGLE = 169.82 PERIAPSIS_TIME = 2004-11-23T16:14:01.000Z SPACECRAFT_ORIENTATION = (0.0,-1.0,0.0) ^MEX_ORIENTATION_DESC = "MEX_ORIENTATION_DESC.TXT" SPACECRAFT_POINTING_MODE = ACROSSTRACK ^MEX_POINTING_DESC = "MEX_POINTING_DESC.TXT" RIGHT_ASCENSION = -1e+32 DECLINATION = -1e+32 OFFSET_ANGLE = -0.62 SPACECRAFT_SOLAR_DISTANCE = 2.41014e+08 TARGET_NAME = MARS /* CAMERA DATA ELEMENTS */ DETECTOR_TEMPERATURE = 18.1666 <degC> FOCAL_PLANE_TEMPERATURE = 8.1755 <degC> INST_CMPRS_NAME = "DISCRETE COSINE TRANSFORMATION (DCT)" INST_CMPRS_RATIO = 13.4668 INST_CMPRS_QUALITY = 0 INST_CMPRS_QUANTZ_TBL_ID = 0 INSTRUMENT_TEMPERATURE = 10.8262 <degC> LENS_TEMPERATURE = 9.6028 <degC> MACROPIXEL_SIZE = 8 MISSING_FRAMES = 0 PIXEL_SUBSAMPLING_FLAG = N SIGNAL_CHAIN_ID = 2 /* RADIOMETRIC DATA ELEMENTS */ BANDWIDTH = 88.0 <nm> CENTER_FILTER_WAVELENGTH = 538.0 <nm> RADIANCE_OFFSET = 0.0 <W*m**-2*sr**-1> RADIANCE_OFFSET = 0.999522 RADIANCE_SCALING_FACTOR = 0.0263032 <W*m**-2*sr**-1> RADIANCE_SCALING_FACTOR = 0.0128937 REFLECTANCE_SCALING_FACTOR = 0.00131548 REFLECTANCE_SCALING_FACTOR = 0.000644843 /* DATA OBJECT DEFINITIONS */ OBJECT = IMAGE INTERCHANGE_FORMAT = BINARY LINES = 9070 LINE_SAMPLES = 761 SAMPLE_TYPE = UNSIGNED_INTEGER SAMPLE_BITS = 8 BANDS = 1 BAND_STORAGE_TYPE = BAND_SEQUENTIAL MAXIMUM = 163 MEAN = 89.6954 MINIMUM = 38 STANDARD_DEVIATION = 7.2111 END_OBJECT = IMAGE /* MAP OBJECT DEFINITIONS */ OBJECT = IMAGE_MAP_PROJECTION ^DATA_SET_MAP_PROJECTION_CATALOG= "DSMAP.CAT" A_AXIS_RADIUS = 3396.19 <km> B_AXIS_RADIUS = 3396.19 <km> C_AXIS_RADIUS = 3396.19 <km> CENTER_LATITUDE = 0.0 CENTER_LONGITUDE = 231.0 COORDINATE_SYSTEM_NAME = PLANETOGRAPHIC COORDINATE_SYSTEM_TYPE = "BODY-FIXED ROTATING" EASTERNMOST_LONGITUDE = 231.495 FIRST_STANDARD_PARALLEL = "N/A" LINE_FIRST_PIXEL = 1 LINE_LAST_PIXEL = 9070 LINE_PROJECTION_OFFSET = 16560.6875 MAP_PROJECTION_ROTATION = 0.0 MAP_PROJECTION_TYPE = SINUSOIDAL MAP_RESOLUTION = 592.746965121889 <pixel/degree> MAP_SCALE = 0.1 <km/pixel> MAXIMUM_LATITUDE = 27.9346 MINIMUM_LATITUDE = 12.6363 POSITIVE_LONGITUDE_DIRECTION = EAST REFERENCE_LATITUDE = "N/A" REFERENCE_LONGITUDE = "N/A" SAMPLE_FIRST_PIXEL = 1 SAMPLE_LAST_PIXEL = 761 SAMPLE_PROJECTION_OFFSET = 483.4375 SECOND_STANDARD_PARALLEL = "N/A" WESTERNMOST_LONGITUDE = 27.9346 END_OBJECT = IMAGE_MAP_PROJECTION /* IMAGE HEADER DATA ELEMENTS */ OBJECT = IMAGE_HEADER HEADER_TYPE = VICAR2 INTERCHANGE_FORMAT = ASCII BYTES = 7610 ^DESCRIPTION = "VICAR2.TXT" END_OBJECT = IMAGE_HEADER END |
|
|
May 10 2006, 07:27 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
Nice one, Doug - look at the cloud shadows! If the sun elevation is known the cloud height can be calculated. Phil Phil: I can't remember actually noticing *any* cloud shadows on Mars before these - lots of clouds, but no shadows... ...funny, that! Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
May 10 2006, 07:53 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
Nice one, Doug - look at the cloud shadows! If the sun elevation is known the cloud height can be calculated. Well from plugging the average time given for the image (2004-11-23 16:11:22) Latitude (20.2913N) and longitude (-230.7915W) into mars 24 I get a Solar Elevation of 53.7deg and Solar Azimuth of 279.9deg if that's any help. |
|
|
May 10 2006, 08:08 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1636 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Lima, Peru Member No.: 385 |
MOLA proved that Arsia or one of the 3 tharsis volcanoes is a bit higher than Olympus, but Olumpus is much taller above it's base. Edstrick, I cannot figure out that 3 Tharsis volcans are higher than Olympus and then Olympus is "taller" than Tharis volcanos. Do you refer that the Tharsis volcanos has higher level of surface base than Olympus Mons? Olympus Mons is the tallest volcan of the solar system and it is the result of billions years of lava acumulation. Hence, the surface around the Olympus Mons has no tectonics plates. This happens the same to the others volcanos sites: Tharsis and Ellysium. Rodolfo |
|
|
May 10 2006, 08:12 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
Well from plugging the average time given for the image (2004-11-23 16:11:22) Latitude (20.2913N) and longitude (-230.7915W) into mars 24 I get a Solar Elevation of 53.7deg and Solar Azimuth of 279.9deg if that's any help. Hmmh - I measure about 62 pixels between the clouds and their shadows in the middle of the picture. According to the metadata the resolution is approx 90.9m/pixel. With the above solar elevation I get an altitude of around 7.67km above the surface (where the shadow is) for those clouds. |
|
|
May 10 2006, 08:16 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Mars 24 - of COURSE.....stupid me, should have thought of that - I'll get the ND image and see if we can get better values
Doug |
|
|
May 10 2006, 08:40 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
Hmmh - I measure about 62 pixels between the clouds and their shadows in the middle of the picture. According to the metadata the resolution is approx 90.9m/pixel. With the above solar elevation I get an altitude of around 7.67km above the surface (where the shadow is) for those clouds. A quick and dirty look at the MOLA elevation data for this spot on Google Mars puts the area where the shadow is at somewhere around 3km above datum which puts these clouds 10km below the top of Olympus so they are possibly water clouds. |
|
|
May 11 2006, 04:14 AM
Post
#27
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 25-April 05 From: Pilsen, CZ, EU Member No.: 363 |
|
|
|
May 11 2006, 07:45 AM
Post
#28
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Well - the Spice data's going to tell you where it was and which way it was pointing at the time - but we don't really care about that - Mars24 work's quite well - I was wondering how I could find out LMST for any point on Mars given an earth time...and the answer was sat on my HDD all the time
Doug |
|
|
May 11 2006, 11:00 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
"....I can't remember actually noticing *any* cloud shadows on Mars before these - lots of clouds, but no shadows..."
Viking Orbiters repeatly saw an unusual cirrus-like cloud in the southern mid-lattitudes somwhere southwest or southeast of the Gusev landign site, maybe about 45 or so south. It was crisply defined, at exceptionally high altitude, and often cast well defined discrete shadows. (altitude directly measured from shadows... 15 or 25 or something km!) The general expectation was that these were recurring CO2 "cirrus" forming where uplift of mid-latitude jetstream or something similar tended to push the temperature below condensation point. ------------------ "Edstrick, I cannot figure out that 3 Tharsis volcans are higher than Olympus and then Olympus is "taller" than Tharis volcanos. Do you refer that the Tharsis volcanos has higher level of surface base than Olympus Mons? " Olumpus is tallest, base to peak, as Mauna Kea (Is that the peak on Hawaii?) is the tallest mountain on Earth. MOLA data showed, I'm pretty sure, that one of the Tharsis trio has the highest altitude relative to the martian geoid ("sea" level datum: gravitational equi-potential surface) on Mars. Don't expect the PR geniuses at NASA to get their educational materials up to date and accurate, if only because they aren't the experts on all sorts of gobs of data published in (to them and many of us) obscure locations. Check peer-reviewed primary mission reports in places like Journal of Geophysical Research for the MOLA data. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 07:08 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |