IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
Cape York - Northern Havens, Sol 2780 - 2947
Phil Stooke
post Jan 17 2012, 03:10 PM
Post #301


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10149
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



It's premature to be taking this analysis too far. We don't know anything about the structural history of this area, and we could easily be looking at rotated slump blocks or draped post-endeavour ejecta deposits, or any number of other things. Careful mapping all along Cape York will be needed to understand its structure.

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 17 2012, 03:51 PM
Post #302


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Beautiful, just beautiful...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 17 2012, 04:06 PM
Post #303


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Indeed! And the skies are quite a bit clearer than during the last Endeavour pan back at Chester Lake. Can't wait for the final result.

Stu, would you mind posting the frame that includes the Notch/Dagger at full resolution?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 17 2012, 04:21 PM
Post #304


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Full resolution here...

http://twitpic.com/88fsh7/full


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jan 17 2012, 06:44 PM
Post #305


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10149
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Very nice!

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jan 17 2012, 11:27 PM
Post #306


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



Here is my take sofar on the Greeley Pan. Just started processing and assembling images today.

Attached Image


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Jan 18 2012, 01:52 AM
Post #307


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE
It's premature to be taking this analysis too far. We don't know anything about the structural history of this area...
Not really, Phil. You've got geologists talking shop and comparing notes about what they have observed on this leg of the traverse. Ideas grow from discussions.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jan 18 2012, 02:24 AM
Post #308


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



Here is the current progress of the Greeley Pan with only the L2 filter. smile.gif

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Jan 18 2012, 04:50 AM
Post #309


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



That's cool James smile.gif
Looking forward to seeing the rest like this biggrin.gif

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jan 18 2012, 05:35 AM
Post #310


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



Astro0 yours is my favorite so far. It's almost as if I'm looking out the window of a sand-crawler vehicle.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jan 18 2012, 05:44 AM
Post #311


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Dan, albeit in a quite indirect way, you are!!! smile.gif

Marvelous is all that can be said.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jan 18 2012, 08:54 PM
Post #312


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



Here is what I got sofar smile.gif. I still have some color touchup to do, but I'll do that in the final version when the rest of the images come down.
Attached Image


Edit: I Lowered the saturation, and I increased the brightness. Let me know if this looks better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jan 18 2012, 10:26 PM
Post #313


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (James Sorenson @ Jan 18 2012, 08:54 PM) *
Here is what I got sofar


Your stitching of the images is superb but (at least on my monitor) the intensity of the tangerine colouration is a bit overpowering and difficult to believe. Is there a reason for this? I ask because another image expert I much respect also produces what look to me like 'overheated' views. Maybe I'm deluding myself and Mars actually does look like that, but my instinct tells me that the colours should be shifted some way - maybe not all the way - in Stu's direction.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jan 18 2012, 11:00 PM
Post #314


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



I agree. I was trying to process the images with what I think the color might look like, but I might have went a little to overboard. I'll tone the saturation down, and raise the brightness abit.

smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jan 19 2012, 03:35 PM
Post #315


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Greely views of the Big Eye are down, looking clearer than ever. Here's a long baseline L2 stereo view from sols 2718 and 2839. The baseline is so wide you can just detect some depth difference as you go from the upper to lower part of the far rim inner slope. It's possible to converge your eyes onto the bright dunes towards the bottom, but that's for experts only.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

40 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 02:25 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.