IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
From Concepción to the "Twin Craters", and beyond...
fredk
post Mar 26 2010, 11:05 PM
Post #121


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2739
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



I think we're still not seeing much of the far crater of the twins. Here's a crude estimate of where the two craters are (the far ellipse should be lower):
Attached Image

Amazing how we're basically on top of the twins and still can't see their full extent.

Mosaic is from Stu.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 26 2010, 11:45 PM
Post #122


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6476
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Not much in the way of ejecta aprons, it seems. Odd. Then again, Victoria didn't have much of one either.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Mar 27 2010, 01:36 AM
Post #123


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2253
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



> Not much in the way of ejecta aprons, it seems.

This is the great puzzle here. One would assume that the Twins are older and that the ejecta rubble has simply weathered and eroded. But looking at the ejecta at Concepcion, expecially the NE ray, the weathered, still in-place material has a significant volume to be blown away without leaving a trace. By "without a trace", I mean no effect on the pre-existing ripples (except withing a few meters of the crater rims). I'd suspect that we may see a difference in the distribution of the blueberies since they would tend to be left behind after the evaporite matrix is weathered and eroded away.

There is more to this erosional process than what firrst meets the eye.

> Then again, Victoria didn't have much of one either

But it does. Eroded, very smooth, unrippled, it is clearly a blanket over the pre-impact terrain.

--Bill



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Mar 27 2010, 05:41 AM
Post #124


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 662
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



hi all,

I tried to search for the answer to these questions, couldn't find 'em.

How many kilometers have the test rovers driven?

Have they tried to drive a test rover on a long trek like this?

Did they attempt anything like such a drive during the mission development stage?

Thanks, and as always, GO TEAM!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Mar 27 2010, 07:19 AM
Post #125


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13246
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Similar question has been asked before - but I think the answer was a 'don't know'

As for development? They were designed for 600 - 1000 m so testing them for 20km+ was never going to be a requirement.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Mar 27 2010, 07:38 AM
Post #126


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6476
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I think maybe a more illuminating set of questions would involve the heritage of the drive system components & whatever testing they were subjected to if they've been used for any terrestrial applications.

Certainly Sojourner must have provided considerable pathfinder (ta dah, dah!) data for the MERs, but obviously all the moving parts are bigger, stronger & faster. Likewise, MSL's drive system is an evolute of MER; the questions are in what specific ways?

(OT for this thread, but very interesting. The engineering results from MER will probably be at least as valuable in their own way as the science over the long term.)


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AndyG
post Mar 27 2010, 11:05 AM
Post #127


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 565
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 279



QUOTE (nprev @ Mar 27 2010, 07:38 AM) *
The engineering results from MER will probably be at least as valuable in their own way as the science over the long term.)


That sounds dangerously close to suggesting you'd like a future MER sample/return mission! laugh.gif

Andy, still unable to reply with FF 3.6.2 ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Mar 27 2010, 12:22 PM
Post #128


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1111
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Marseille - FR
Member No.: 678



Hi,

Back from a break (I think you can understood that sometimes we need to rest) of processing pictures, I started to make again (and again) colors of Oppy.

Much more interested by the pretty amazing view of Endurance rims on the horizon, like on Sol 2169 :

or Sol 2191


And here is the view of the approaching of "Twin Craters" (no names so I presume ?)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Mar 27 2010, 03:44 PM
Post #129


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Good work, Ant, good work... smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Mar 27 2010, 05:55 PM
Post #130


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4164
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



According to the mobility info, we are there! Actually, 10m N of the west crater.
Can't wait for the images!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Mar 27 2010, 06:14 PM
Post #131





Guests






WOW that was quick, doesn't seem long ago they were 300m away.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Mar 27 2010, 07:39 PM
Post #132


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2930
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Mar 27 2010, 01:36 AM) *
> Not much in the way of ejecta aprons, it seems.

This is the great puzzle here.


I seem to remember there's thought to be a certain thickness of Meridiani stuff (several metres, I can't remember how many) which erodes down until the covering of residual blueberries is dense enough to halt the process. Any crater too small for it's ejecta apron to exceed that critical thickness might be expected to erode down all the way to the original surface, leaving (as you suggested) an excess of blueberries as it's only trace. I wonder what that critical crater size is?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Mar 27 2010, 07:46 PM
Post #133


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2739
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Hello twins!
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...DXP0717R0M1.JPG
The isthmus runs through the centre of this frame:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...DXP0717R0M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Mar 27 2010, 08:07 PM
Post #134


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2739
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Isthmus in 3D:
Attached Image

Still hard to make out the east twin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mirek
post Mar 27 2010, 08:37 PM
Post #135


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: 19-August 09
From: Dallas
Member No.: 4905



My first panorama on UMSF:

Twin Craters


This post has been edited by Mirek: Mar 27 2010, 10:30 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

16 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 11 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 01:38 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.