From Concepción to the "Twin Craters", and beyond... |
![]() ![]() |
From Concepción to the "Twin Craters", and beyond... |
Mar 26 2010, 11:05 PM
Post
#121
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2739 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 26 2010, 11:45 PM
Post
#122
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 6476 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Not much in the way of ejecta aprons, it seems. Odd. Then again, Victoria didn't have much of one either.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 01:36 AM
Post
#123
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2253 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
> Not much in the way of ejecta aprons, it seems.
This is the great puzzle here. One would assume that the Twins are older and that the ejecta rubble has simply weathered and eroded. But looking at the ejecta at Concepcion, expecially the NE ray, the weathered, still in-place material has a significant volume to be blown away without leaving a trace. By "without a trace", I mean no effect on the pre-existing ripples (except withing a few meters of the crater rims). I'd suspect that we may see a difference in the distribution of the blueberies since they would tend to be left behind after the evaporite matrix is weathered and eroded away. There is more to this erosional process than what firrst meets the eye. > Then again, Victoria didn't have much of one either But it does. Eroded, very smooth, unrippled, it is clearly a blanket over the pre-impact terrain. --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 05:41 AM
Post
#124
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 662 Joined: 9-February 07 Member No.: 1700 |
hi all,
I tried to search for the answer to these questions, couldn't find 'em. How many kilometers have the test rovers driven? Have they tried to drive a test rover on a long trek like this? Did they attempt anything like such a drive during the mission development stage? Thanks, and as always, GO TEAM!! |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 07:19 AM
Post
#125
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13246 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Similar question has been asked before - but I think the answer was a 'don't know'
As for development? They were designed for 600 - 1000 m so testing them for 20km+ was never going to be a requirement. |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 07:38 AM
Post
#126
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 6476 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I think maybe a more illuminating set of questions would involve the heritage of the drive system components & whatever testing they were subjected to if they've been used for any terrestrial applications.
Certainly Sojourner must have provided considerable pathfinder (ta dah, dah!) data for the MERs, but obviously all the moving parts are bigger, stronger & faster. Likewise, MSL's drive system is an evolute of MER; the questions are in what specific ways? (OT for this thread, but very interesting. The engineering results from MER will probably be at least as valuable in their own way as the science over the long term.) -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 11:05 AM
Post
#127
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 565 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 12:22 PM
Post
#128
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1111 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Marseille - FR Member No.: 678 |
Hi,
Back from a break (I think you can understood that sometimes we need to rest) of processing pictures, I started to make again (and again) colors of Oppy. Much more interested by the pretty amazing view of Endurance rims on the horizon, like on Sol 2169 : ![]() or Sol 2191 ![]() And here is the view of the approaching of "Twin Craters" (no names so I presume ?)
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 03:44 PM
Post
#129
|
|
![]() The Poet Dude ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 5546 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Good work, Ant, good work...
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 05:55 PM
Post
#130
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4164 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
According to the mobility info, we are there! Actually, 10m N of the west crater.
Can't wait for the images! |
|
|
|
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Mar 27 2010, 06:14 PM
Post
#131
|
|
Guests |
WOW that was quick, doesn't seem long ago they were 300m away.
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 07:39 PM
Post
#132
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2930 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
> Not much in the way of ejecta aprons, it seems. This is the great puzzle here. I seem to remember there's thought to be a certain thickness of Meridiani stuff (several metres, I can't remember how many) which erodes down until the covering of residual blueberries is dense enough to halt the process. Any crater too small for it's ejecta apron to exceed that critical thickness might be expected to erode down all the way to the original surface, leaving (as you suggested) an excess of blueberries as it's only trace. I wonder what that critical crater size is? |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 07:46 PM
Post
#133
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2739 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Hello twins!
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...DXP0717R0M1.JPG The isthmus runs through the centre of this frame: http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...DXP0717R0M1.JPG |
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 08:07 PM
Post
#134
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2739 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2010, 08:37 PM
Post
#135
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 19-August 09 From: Dallas Member No.: 4905 |
My first panorama on UMSF:
Twin Craters
This post has been edited by Mirek: Mar 27 2010, 10:30 PM |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 01:38 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|