IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

21 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MSL Post Landing - Commissioning Period & Early Observations, Commissioning Activity Period 1B - Sols 9 through 16
climber
post Aug 17 2012, 07:50 PM
Post #31


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2922
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ Aug 17 2012, 09:47 PM) *
I'm wondering about the drill's longevity myself. I know Spirit's wore out a lot faster than Oppy's because of the difference in rock hardness, and so had to limit themselves to very interesting targets.
Will we have to wait until a drilling is done to see how much wear and tear it can take?

Listen to Emily here: http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakda...-curiosity.html
They've got 2 more spare once the first one will be out rolleyes.gif

Edited: or read here: http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs...rs-1-tools.html


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ondaweb
post Aug 17 2012, 08:05 PM
Post #32


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 12-March 10
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 5262



QUOTE (charleski @ Aug 17 2012, 02:35 PM) *
Can the ChemCam wear out? I'm not sure if this is a silly question, but one of the replies in the Telecon seemed fairly specific in terms of the maximum number of pulses that they'd be using in the coming weeks.


I heard this as referring to the design criteria, i.e., the minimum it should be able to do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
akuo
post Aug 17 2012, 08:06 PM
Post #33


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 24-March 04
From: Finland
Member No.: 63



I got the impression that they were not so much afraid of the drill getting damaged, but that the rock at the rocket impigment site wouldn't be good to drill into. It has been suggested that it may be duricrust. Would that be too fragile to get a good sample out of with the drill?

Also I think it was mentioned that the first sample to go into the labrotary kits would be dust or some other fines that is scoopable.


--------------------
Antti Kuosmanen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Aug 17 2012, 08:18 PM
Post #34


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I think it's just not a good first sample to drill. They're going to want something that has a horizontal surface and that is a piece of rock that looks homogeneous, not a conglomerate of chunks of rock that may be more or less strongly cemented together by something else.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
craigmcg
post Aug 17 2012, 08:42 PM
Post #35


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 21-April 05
From: Rochester, New York, USA
Member No.: 336



Also sounded like we will be waiting a while before the photos of the top of Mt. Sharp will be takend and transmitted. Originally, I believe it was hoped to get them in during the past few days. (If my memory is correct?)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 17 2012, 09:39 PM
Post #36


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10256
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here's a circular version of the full navcam pan:

Attached Image


And this is the middle bit with labels to put our newest names into a more maplike perspective:

Attached Image


Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 17 2012, 09:43 PM
Post #37


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14448
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ Aug 17 2012, 12:47 PM) *
I'm wondering about the drill's longevity myself.


The spares are not there because they worry the drill will wear out. They're there in case the drill gets stuck.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Aug 17 2012, 09:59 PM
Post #38


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4260
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (craigmcg @ Aug 17 2012, 09:42 PM) *
Also sounded like we will be waiting a while before the photos of the top of Mt. Sharp will be taken
We'll actually have to wait a very long time to see the absolute summit. From here we can only see the northern part of the central mound.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Aug 17 2012, 10:26 PM
Post #39


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1374
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



The sun is in the south a lot, so they have to be super careful not to point at the sun with the normal filters. Also they seemed to indicate they wern't sure of the exposures needed. I am am sure Mike Malin will sort it all out.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Aug 17 2012, 11:13 PM
Post #40


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



There would be a Big Problem if ChemCam inadvertently pointed at the Sun. No more ChemCam.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Joffan
post Aug 17 2012, 11:16 PM
Post #41


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 178
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 498



If they really want to exercise the laser pointing, they should try writing "JPL" on N165. It's basically the landing reference, so a little commemorative grafitti seems in order.

My suggested name for N165: Zero Pebble.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 17 2012, 11:26 PM
Post #42


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14448
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Yeah- there are some serious flight rules about sun-pointing the mast. You can do it for a few minutes, but then you have to turn away and let the ChemCam unit cool down. It's a big-ol reflecting telescope in there , and even at 1.5au - the sun can still do damage when you focus an area of its power.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Aug 17 2012, 11:29 PM
Post #43


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Aug 17 2012, 03:46 PM) *
From http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1500.pdf -- "However, the instrument was limited to 30 analyses per sol, realistic for its expected laser lifetime of ~20,000 analyses."
I'm not sure this applies to the flight unit but I would expect the laser to have some finite lifetime.


At approximately 11:30 in today's press conference, Roger Wiens, ChemCam principal investigator, said that ChemCam's "benchmark qualification" was the ability to do 14,000 analyses.

You can replay the press conference on ustream here.

I have to say that it took me a little bit of googling to find the replay website. A reference to that url on the media announcements would have been helpful, or even just a mention that the replay would be hosted on ustream.

TTT (It's probably a sign that I'm past my "sell by" date, but ustream is not a site that's in my brain's short-term RAM, or a term that I would have thought to have included in searching for NASA press conferences. Of course I know better now, but still ....)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Aug 17 2012, 11:41 PM
Post #44


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Recording teleconferences to UStream is brand new for JPL. They've streamed TV conferences there for a long time, but the audio-only ones are a new thing.


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Aug 18 2012, 12:15 AM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2547
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (MahFL @ Aug 17 2012, 03:26 PM) *
The sun is in the south a lot...

We're in the southern hemisphere, so the sun is in the north a lot. Maybe that's what you meant? Playing with Mars24 is instructive.

AFAIK sun avoidance shouldn't be a huge factor in imaging the summit, though it does have to be checked.

Some of us would appreciate it if you said "MSSS will sort it all out" instead of ascribing the entire operation of the instrument to one person smile.gif


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

21 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 10:50 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.