IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Earth observing mission for USD 12 million?
marsbug
post May 13 2012, 12:13 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



Good evening all, I hope this is an appropriate place to ask this question: I read this space.com article which quotes a cost for an Earth observing mission of 12 million US dollars (mission hardware only) using a swarm of nano-sats. This seems to me to remarkably cheap, so I was wondering if I am missing something, or if my ideas about what Earth observing missions cost is grossly inflated by only reading about the highest profile ones?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post May 13 2012, 12:29 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



"Not including launch costs."

This:
http://www.innovationnewsdaily.com/672-dar...satellites.html

I'm not sure why it's expected to be so cheap to develop. Perhaps building on experience like this for very small payloads:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tanjent
post May 13 2012, 02:35 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 628



It's interesting to think about how that might work. Decay in 45 days + launched from a plane seems to mean the satellites go to a low earth orbit. It is reassuring to know that they clean themselves up when the mission is over. But the diagram shows, not a "swarm" but a "string" of sattelites circling the Earth at widely-spaced intervals. It is borderline misleading to imply that all can hover in selected northern hemispphere hot spots at the same time. Good luck with that. On the plus side, it appears the nano sats don't really have to be launched from anywhere near the scene of the hostilities, but could be launched from a fixed platform like White Sands, Johnston Island, Vandenberg, etc... They don't end up looking that much different from ordinary reconnaisance sateliltes; only smaller and individually less reliable.

Off topic, I'd like to equip them with little parachutes and maybe spider legs, and sprinkle them over Valles Marineris.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsbug
post May 15 2012, 11:05 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 401
Joined: 5-January 07
From: Manchester England
Member No.: 1563



I'd just like to point out: 'Swarm' was just a term of convenience, Ie lots of litle co-operateing craft. Didn't intend to mislead anyone as to their capabilities.

Even accounting for launch costs this still seems a a cheap mission. Perhaps they are designing around a pre-existing nano-sat platform like cubesat? RE tanjent: I wonder if this approach would suit NEO exploration well, given the low cost and (presumably) low power reserves for transmission on each unit?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 11:03 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.