IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

36 Pages V  « < 28 29 30 31 32 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MESSENGER News Thread, news, updates and discussion
Paolo
post Dec 1 2012, 05:46 PM
Post #436


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



QUOTE (Explorer1 @ Dec 1 2012, 06:21 PM) *
Or maybe the 3:2 resonance does so in some way?


I was thinking about this possibility too...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 1 2012, 07:22 PM
Post #437


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Another big difference between Mercury & Mars is that the former has a very large liquid iron/nickel core in comparison to its total size; may dramatically affect its spin behavior.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Dec 2 2012, 01:53 AM
Post #438


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



FYI, a lot of release images and discussion posted here:
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Dec 2 2012, 05:06 AM
Post #439


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



Dynamical effects are hard to make sense of without number crunching, but in comparing Mercury and Mars, I started here:

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1...000293.000.html

This says that for the nutation of Mars's axis, Jupiter has about triple the effect of Earth, but those sum to a tiny fraction (~1e-4) of the total precession.

To switch the case to Mercury, we get several times further from Jupiter, several times closer to the Sun, and more or less swap Venus in and the Earth out. So that is to say, in the case of Mercury, the planet::Sun effects should be much smaller than that of Mars, by at least a factor of 10 to 100.

Mercury's rotation is not tidally locked to the Sun, but it is clearly controlled by the Sun. Counting Venus and the Moon, three of the four closest bodies to the Sun have a lower axial inclination than any of the gas giants do (although Venus's is just less than Jupiter's) and that's not a coincidence.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Dec 2 2012, 09:37 AM
Post #440


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



I have found this on the subject: On the oscillations in Mercury's obliquity
oscillations of the spin axis have a very small amplitude, and the spin/orbit resonance really has a stabilizing effect, so much so that the solution of the n-body simulation does not differ too much from a 2-body simulation
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Feb 19 2013, 06:28 PM
Post #441


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



Oblique limb view:
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/scienc...p?image_id=1097

Relatively new view at this point, but:
QUOTE
This image was acquired as part of MDIS's limb imaging campaign. Once per week, MDIS captures images of Mercury's limb, with an emphasis on imaging the southern hemisphere limb. These limb images provide information about Mercury's shape and complement measurements of topography made by the Mercury Laser Altimeter (MLA) of Mercury's northern hemisphere.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Mar 2 2013, 09:43 AM
Post #442


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



from this NASA release The NASA Comet ISON Observing Campaign it looks like MESSENGER will still be around to observe the comet. but I still have not seen any news on the 2nd extended mission
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Jul 19 2013, 05:11 PM
Post #443


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



Enhanced color Mercury map:
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/scienc...p?image_id=1226
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Jul 21 2013, 03:55 PM
Post #444


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1627
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Nice to see this map now in cylindrical format. Next on my wish list would be a similar map in "true color".


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Jul 22 2013, 07:58 PM
Post #445


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



According to this:
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/scienc...mp;image_id=203
... the enhanced color images result "by displaying the negative of [a principle component image] in red, a different principal component in green, and a ratio of images taken in two WAC filters (430 nm/560 nm) in blue."

The blue seems, to the first order, to be a good way to capture true blueness. Depending on the details of those PCAs for the other two colors, this may be a pretty good rendition of "true color" (never a straightforward thing in the first place) with the saturation turned way up. So if you turn down the saturation on this enhanced color image, the result may possibly be a decent rendition of true color.

In reality, a human observer looking at Mercury would be "snowblind" so it would be essential to filter the glare in order to see any colors, and once there's a filter involved, any sense of "true" becomes quite relative. You can't just turn down the brightness without also altering color perception.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Nov 9 2013, 04:33 PM
Post #446


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



Two movies from the narrow-angle camera:
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/scienc...p?image_id=1292
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/scienc...p?image_id=1293
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Dec 2 2013, 04:10 PM
Post #447


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



I have just received confirmation that MESSENGER will survive up to 28 March 2015, when it will impact the surface of Mercury (at 58.1 N, and away from sight of Earth at impact).
Three periapsis rising maneuvers are planned in 2014, and a final one in 2015.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Dec 2 2013, 07:56 PM
Post #448


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10150
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Oh boy! I smell a point on a map! (sorry, MESSENGER)

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Dec 2 2013, 08:57 PM
Post #449


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Dec 2 2013, 02:56 PM) *
...a point on a map!
But I guess you'll have to wait until BepiColombo gets there in 2022 to see the point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Dec 2 2013, 09:24 PM
Post #450


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Hmm. When MESSENGER impacts that will mean that all of the planets known to the ancients but Saturn (but don't forget Titan!) will have human artifacts present.

Progress of sorts. smile.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

36 Pages V  « < 28 29 30 31 32 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 03:58 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.