IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Moving A Rock?
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Sep 15 2005, 10:47 PM
Post #1





Guests






Have mission controllers ever considered using the IDD to try and move a rock or turn one over?

This one on the Erebus Highway would be a good candidate:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...00P2365L7M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chokai
post Sep 16 2005, 02:08 AM
Post #2


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 21-April 05
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 339



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Sep 15 2005, 02:47 PM)
Have mission controllers ever considered using the IDD to try and move a rock or turn one over?

This one on the Erebus Highway would be a good candidate:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...00P2365L7M1.JPG
*


It would probably be safer to park one of the rovers wheels on such a rock, lock all the other weels and then turn the one on the rock. Similar to what is done when trenching with the front wheels. It would also allow you to move considerably larger objects.

There was a great deal of discussion on using the IDD as a leverage device when Oppy was stuck in Purgatory dune. People pretty much determined the downward pressure the arm can exert is probably less than 10 pounds, much less the lateral pressure required to "turn" a rock. In the interest of science return you probably wouldn't want to do anything that would risk damaging the arm.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Airbag
post Sep 16 2005, 02:29 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 3-August 05
Member No.: 453



From the RAT's specifications:

"Force from Rover Arm: 10-100 newtons (real life [Earth] comparison is 2.2 lbs = 10 newtons)"

That is presumably in a downwards/forwards direction. Lifting would be quite another thing of course - I wouldn't be surprised if the IDD was designed to just barely be able to lift its own instruments (on Earth).

Airbag
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Sep 16 2005, 10:17 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (chokai @ Sep 16 2005, 03:08 AM)
It would probably be safer to park one of the rovers wheels on such a rock, lock all the other weels and then turn the one on the rock. Similar to what is done when trenching with the front wheels.  It would also allow you to move considerably larger objects.

There was a great deal of discussion on using the IDD as a leverage device when Oppy was stuck in Purgatory dune.  People pretty much determined the downward pressure the arm can exert is probably less than 10 pounds, much less the lateral pressure required to "turn" a rock.  In the interest of science return you probably wouldn't want to do anything that would risk damaging the arm.
*


Perhaps at the point when/if the instruments on the arm go Phut! then it'll start getting used as a crowbar - until then, I doubt it! Having said that, a good look at the underside of a rock or two would be a fine thing to have. Of course, you'd need to have the camera on the arm working...


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Sep 16 2005, 11:37 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



I've continually wished for a very simple backhoe or trenching tool on the rovers... trenching by wheel-scuffing pretty badly scrambles the original ?layered? geometry (or whatever) of the soil. But as always, when you wish for something on the rover, you have to consider what you'd agree would have to be left off to make room.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Sep 16 2005, 01:20 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Sep 15 2005, 05:47 PM)
Have mission controllers ever considered using the IDD to try and move a rock or turn one over?

This one on the Erebus Highway would be a good candidate:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...00P2365L7M1.JPG
*

It think it is worth to see what is under the stone. It seems like that it is a layer of a rock. If it is true, then try to slide it with one of rover's wheel (safest) and even better if it is truned over. Using the IDD to tumble it is a possible but it seems like to be a VERY TRICKY game if the remote control feedback is fast. However, using the remote control from Earth to turn it out would be almost impossible. sad.gif Needs lots of feedback of control to turn it over.

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff7
post Sep 16 2005, 04:33 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



QUOTE
It would probably be safer to park one of the rovers wheels on such a rock, lock all the other weels and then turn the one on the rock. Similar to what is done when trenching with the front wheels. It would also allow you to move considerably larger objects.


Or put that stuck front wheel to some good use.
Position the front wheel to the left of a rock, so that the wheel is also resting on loose sand.
Lock all other wheels, and rotate just that one wheel, to try to dig it in a bit.
Now turn the entire rover to the right. Rock will be caught by the wheel and shoved completely aside. And if we're lucky, it might catch something and flip over.
Now, turn back, and look for bugs and worms under the rock. smile.gif
Spinning a wheel on top might merely abrade the rock (at least we'd have a reserve RAT, right?biggrin.gif).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 07:36 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.