IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Stardust@home
djellison
post Feb 3 2006, 09:59 AM
Post #16


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



No news yet - I doubt they'll send out emails for the 'test' until they have proper imagery ready to go - so end of this month, beginning of next I'd guess

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Feb 3 2006, 12:11 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



QUOTE (akuo @ Jan 9 2006, 04:20 PM)
Is there some sort of explanation from the Stardust team why this detection cannot be done by a computer program scanning the images? Are the marks left by interstellar dust so unpredictable that human work is needed? How does the person know what to look for then?
*


Because people have an image processing and pattern recognition software package that has had about 1,000,000,000 years of development work invested in it. biggrin.gif

tty
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Feb 3 2006, 09:03 PM
Post #18





Guests






Well, with Stardust (finally) at home... I remember reading something that the rest of the capsule might be displayed at the Natioanl Air & Space Museum in Washington D.C. ohmy.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ljk4-1
post Feb 4 2006, 02:03 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Feb 3 2006, 04:03 PM)
Well, with Stardust (finally) at home... I remember reading something that the rest of the capsule might be displayed at the Natioanl Air & Space Museum in Washington D.C.  ohmy.gif
*


This got me thinking: What will they eventually do with the Genesis return capsule?


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Feb 4 2006, 02:33 AM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (tty @ Feb 3 2006, 12:11 PM)
Because people have an image processing and pattern recognition software package that has had about 1,000,000,000 years of development work invested  in it.  biggrin.gif
*

With open source algorithms!


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Feb 4 2006, 08:18 AM
Post #21





Guests






QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Feb 4 2006, 02:03 AM)
This got me thinking:  What will they eventually do with the Genesis return capsule?
*


Sweep its pieces quietly under the rug.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 28 2006, 09:02 AM
Post #22


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



TPS members will be pleased to see that you can now do the 'beta' testing phase - interface is actually very good, I'm enjoying it.

QUOTE
Your score: 10 out of 10

Passing score: 8 out of 10


I'm a pro, me.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Apr 28 2006, 10:29 AM
Post #23





Guests






An LPSC abstract on the results from the first test of Stardust@Home's likely reliability shows promising results: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2006/pdf/2225.pdf . (There's also a description of it from the previous year's LPSC: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2005/pdf/1908.pdf .)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Borek
post Apr 28 2006, 10:45 AM
Post #24


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 48
Joined: 10-February 05
Member No.: 166



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Feb 4 2006, 02:33 AM) *
With open source algorithms!


Show me the source, then.
I would say that the sources are very proprietary and hard to reverse-engineer.

Borek
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Apr 28 2006, 08:18 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Feb 4 2006, 03:03 AM) *
This got me thinking: What will they eventually do with the Genesis return capsule?


They'll display it in 23 museums across the US of A!

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Apr 28 2006, 10:00 PM
Post #26





Guests






In a bag...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 28 2006, 10:56 PM
Post #27


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



To be fair, the samples may be scrap, but the aeroshell is recognisable - but I don't think they'd want to display it by any stretch of the imagination. It would be like exhibiting the dent in your bumper before getting an insurance quote for your car.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Apr 28 2006, 11:04 PM
Post #28


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (Borek @ Apr 28 2006, 10:45 AM) *
I would say that the sources are very proprietary and hard to reverse-engineer.

But really easy to copy, well replicate at any rate with some modifications smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Apr 28 2006, 11:26 PM
Post #29


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



I passed the Stardust@Home training, 10/10 smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Apr 29 2006, 12:23 PM
Post #30


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 28 2006, 11:56 PM) *
To be fair, the samples may be scrap, but the aeroshell is recognisable - but I don't think they'd want to display it by any stretch of the imagination. It would be like exhibiting the dent in your bumper before getting an insurance quote for your car.

Doug



Doug:

Actually, all the more reason to display it - the debris should be preserved in the (several) places where the errors were made which resulted in the parachute failure, along with a full presentation about the causes, the enquiries, and the lessons learned in terms of physical and management procedures!

But they'll probably quietly lose it.

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2024 - 04:07 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.