Pluto Surface Observations 1: NH Post-Encounter Phase, 1 Aug 2015- 10 Oct 2015 |
Pluto Surface Observations 1: NH Post-Encounter Phase, 1 Aug 2015- 10 Oct 2015 |
Aug 10 2015, 08:06 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 82 Joined: 13-July 15 Member No.: 7579 |
Regarding NH's trajectory, if I remember correctly the flyby didn't occur at exactly the planned time (off by some seconds but well within the required accuracy) and this makes it more tricky to use the metadata to accurately determine the viewing geometry (especially in the hi-res images) until an updated trajectory (SPICE kernels) becomes avvailable. At first I tried to use the data from http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons.cgi#top but I found that the position of NH was displaced approximately 120 seconds, so I used the least squares method (with using distances to Pluto, Charon, Nix and Hydra up to 2,000,000 km) to made a correction of 3D position (about 1,665 kilometers) and velocity vector (about 11.6 m/s) so that the simulated distances become coincide to metadata with an error of about 0.1 km. |
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 11:40 AM
Post
#47
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 9-August 12 From: London, UK Member No.: 6521 |
Hi all, I rarely post, but had a question on this amazing mission for those more knowledgeable.
When I look at the excellent simulation in "Eyes", I can see that at approx 15 mins. before closest approach, Charon "sets" behind Pluto", then at 9 minutes, it rises. Eyes doesn't show any photos taken at all of these events, in fact NH doesn't appear to be pointing at anything. These would have not only made dramatic pictures, but presumably at the Charon-rise point would highlight features on the limb? Am I missing something (probably), or would these images have been of no value? |
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 12:38 PM
Post
#48
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 82 Joined: 13-July 15 Member No.: 7579 |
Michael, I, too, for a long time the question arose.
As specially missed Charon set, while Pluto was carried out for all the cameras shooting Charon was behind, ahead of Charon, and its rise is also not hit in images. |
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 04:26 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Imaging this was suggested several years ago, but I don't know if it actually happened. Priority obviously had to be given to high-value science data acquisition at that time so I really doubt that made the cut.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 04:47 PM
Post
#50
|
|||||
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 82 Joined: 13-July 15 Member No.: 7579 |
What kind of scientific data loss can be a question if deviation on Charonset
is 133 seconds, and at Charonrise just 50 seconds? Judging by the nature of scanning at once by RALPH, LORRI and Alice, the images of Charonset and Charonrise were obtained. Just NASA's Eyes bit not exactly show the real program running by NH. Due to the motion of Charon relative Pluto while TDI of MVIC camera Charon could slightly smeared. But this adds even natural tableau. |
||||
|
|||||
Aug 12 2015, 05:00 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 9-August 12 From: London, UK Member No.: 6521 |
...Judging by the nature of scanning at once by RALPH, LORRI and Alice, the images of Charonset and Charonrise were obtained. Just NASA's Eyes bit not exactly show the real program running by NH. I hope so - I'm thinking of the Apollo 8 earthrise shots; ok, it's not the Earth, but NASA needs all the publicity it can get if it is to keep and hopefully increase the budget for continuing exploration. |
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 05:11 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1633 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
Imaging this was suggested several years ago, but I don't know if it actually happened. Priority obviously had to be given to high-value science data acquisition at that time so I really doubt that made the cut. Indeed, weren't "Kodak moments" discussed on this forum to help the NH Team with image planning? -------------------- Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 05:40 PM
Post
#53
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 05:56 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 05:57 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 82 Joined: 13-July 15 Member No.: 7579 |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 08:11 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
AFAIK shooting these images was briefly considered but there was just too much going on near C/A; it would've cost too much valuable science at that moment.
In general, it was a lot harder to make "Kodak Moments" at Pluto than it was at Jupiter, because of the angle of approach -- recall that all the Jupiter Kodak Moments were mutual events, and those didn't happen from New Horizons' point of view on Pluto except for that one moment at C/A when it had other things to do. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Aug 13 2015, 03:07 AM
Post
#57
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 82 Joined: 13-July 15 Member No.: 7579 |
AFAIK shooting these images was briefly considered but there was just too much going on near C/A; it would've cost too much valuable science at that moment. What is valuable science measurement might suffer if all the same, and the rising and setting of the whole fit into the one 8 minute scan, taken with a large margin (margin of 1 Pluto disc on both sides)? On the contrary, picture of Charonset could provide additional information about the atmosphere of Pluto (Charon may have slightly dimming to near the edge of Pluto) and on the topography on the limb. |
|
|
Aug 13 2015, 03:53 AM
Post
#58
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Lacking any direct knowledge, I cannot say for certain that such imagery was not acquired, but given the very tight window combined with the uncertainly in arrival times Doug mentioned as well as numerous other critical demands on the spacecraft during this period it is vanishingly unlikely. If that was the NH team's judgement--as seems very, very likely--then that's the way it is, and we are not going to argue about it. Period. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Aug 13 2015, 04:41 AM
Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2085 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
We could always simulate the view at any rate, right? Once all the actually taken data is received and we have accurate hi-res maps of the appropriate areas, like in the Cassini thread when predicting which parts of a particular icy satellite getting a close flyby the next rev will be mapped.
|
|
|
Aug 13 2015, 08:58 AM
Post
#60
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 9-August 12 From: London, UK Member No.: 6521 |
We could always simulate the view at any rate, right? Once all the actually taken data is received and we have accurate hi-res maps of the appropriate areas, like in the Cassini thread when predicting which parts of a particular icy satellite getting a close flyby the next rev will be mapped. Once mapping is complete we can indeed simulate any such view with a simple setup. I raised the original question about the Charon-set/rise images, and although disappointed, I'm quite happy the the science team has decided there are greater priorities. Famous images such as Pale Blue Dot or the Day the Earth Smiled have only been gathered when all primary science has been completed. A spacecraft in orbit is a completely different case to a fly-by such as this, which is a one-and-only chance to grab as much science data as possible. All indications so far are that the bounty of information collected exceeds all expectations. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th May 2024 - 11:43 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |