IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
Cape York - Northern Havens, Sol 2780 - 2947
Mongo
post Dec 9 2011, 03:11 AM
Post #166


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 723
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



I think that the importance of this discovery is not so much the discovery of a mineral probably formed in low-acidity water (that had been done first by Spirit, with Comanche) as it is the fact that the gypsum deposition was apparently done in situ. Comanche was moved to its present location from elsewhere, so there was little geological context to work with, whereas with Homestake, we have Endeavour Crater's rim and bowl to (I hope) make traverses over, in order to put this discovery into its spatial and temporal context.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Dec 9 2011, 04:49 AM
Post #167


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



QUOTE (Floyd @ Dec 8 2011, 08:36 PM) *
Crystaline gypsum is a lot differnt from plasterboard. Think of the crystals in the Mexican cave...


Nonetheless, gypsum is relatively soft relative to other minerals. It's "2" on Moh's Scale of Mineral Hardness, roughly in between the hardness of a pencil "lead" (graphite) and a fingernail.


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Dec 9 2011, 06:23 AM
Post #168


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



QUOTE (ilbasso @ Dec 8 2011, 08:49 PM) *
Nonetheless, gypsum is relatively soft relative to other minerals.


It's clearly harder than the rock surrounding it, as evidenced by the drive-over. Perhaps the vein has only been exhumed relatively recently in geological terms.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Dec 9 2011, 10:41 AM
Post #169


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Two frame MI mosaic...

Attached Image


From here, I guess...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marz
post Dec 9 2011, 04:19 PM
Post #170


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482



QUOTE (Stu @ Dec 9 2011, 04:41 AM) *
Two frame MI mosaic...


Bright inclusions on the upper-right might be more gypsum? And are those vugs in the lower left?

Thanks Stu!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eutectic
post Dec 9 2011, 04:44 PM
Post #171


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 1-March 11
From: Houston, USA
Member No.: 5860



QUOTE (ilbasso @ Dec 8 2011, 11:49 PM) *
Nonetheless, gypsum is relatively soft relative to other minerals. It's "2" on Moh's Scale of Mineral Hardness, roughly in between the hardness of a pencil "lead" (graphite) and a fingernail.


With loss of water, gypsum can change to anhydrite, which rates 3.5 on Mohs. That's still pretty soft, especially compared to minerals in basalt (5ish-7ish). Moreover, anhydrite is about 25% denser than gypsum, so the transformation of gypsum to anhydrite would be accompanied by shrinking rather than expansion, which would have been another potential way to explain the vein's positive relief.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Dec 9 2011, 05:31 PM
Post #172


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Good point, Eutectic.

Mineral hardness and weatherability don't always corrrelate. Remember, in some climes limestone can be a resistant ridge-former and in others a weak valley-former.

The important thing is, is that this fracture fill is composed of CaSO4 and we need to consider the geochemical implications of that...

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Oersted_*
post Dec 9 2011, 05:35 PM
Post #173





Guests






QUOTE (vikingmars @ Dec 8 2011, 10:20 PM) *
Here you are : gypsum ...and coming from our Museum of Plaster close to Paris.


Hmm, that arrowhead is made of flint if I'm not mistaken. Or did I misunderstand something?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Dec 9 2011, 06:54 PM
Post #174


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Surface detail...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Dec 9 2011, 08:53 PM
Post #175


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



Maybe the surrounding terrain wasn't eroded by wind, but just dissolved in water.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Dec 9 2011, 11:58 PM
Post #176


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1083
Joined: 19-February 05
From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France
Member No.: 172



QUOTE (Oersted @ Dec 9 2011, 06:35 PM) *
Hmm, that arrowhead is made of flint if I'm not mistaken. Or did I misunderstand something?

This is the developed crystalline form of gypsum : the arrowhead (links added hereabove).
Gypsum arrowheads are very common here. We are being shown these since school in Paris and you see them oftenly when visiting the Paris underground quarries...
http://www.urban-exploration.com/index.php...;r=TOIT%20PARIS
Most of old houses in Paris and close to it (like mine) are made of rocks (taken from the quarries) and plaster made of gypsum (and also with a mix of those). Gypsum is also now transformed into construction panels easy to assemble and is considered as a very environmental-friendly material smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Dec 10 2011, 04:39 AM
Post #177


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (vikingmars @ Dec 9 2011, 06:58 PM) *
Gypsum arrowheads are very common here....
I found this explanation of the formation of gypsum "spearheads" in the French Wikipedia:
"Le gypse en fer de lance est le résultat de la macle de deux grands cristaux lenticulaires."

Google translation: "Gypsum as a spearhead is the result of the twinning of two large lenticular crystals."


Can you imagine if Opportunity imaged this (from vikingmars' second link) laying on Cape York?!

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Dec 10 2011, 04:42 AM
Post #178


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (ngunn @ Dec 7 2011, 05:35 PM) *
Gypsum is too soft, surely. Hardness 2. How would it stand up to erosion in this way?

QUOTE (ngunn @ Dec 8 2011, 06:02 PM) *
Gypsum is so soft, how can it make upstanding veins?

QUOTE (ilbasso @ Dec 8 2011, 10:49 PM) *
Nonetheless, gypsum is relatively soft relative to other minerals. It's "2" on Moh's Scale of Mineral Hardness, roughly in between the hardness of a pencil "lead" (graphite) and a fingernail.

QUOTE (marsophile @ Dec 9 2011, 12:23 AM) *
It's clearly harder than the rock surrounding it, as evidenced by the drive-over. Perhaps the vein has only been exhumed relatively recently in geological terms.

QUOTE (Eutectic @ Dec 9 2011, 10:44 AM) *
With loss of water, gypsum can change to anhydrite, which rates 3.5 on Mohs. That's still pretty soft, especially compared to minerals in basalt (5ish-7ish). Moreover, anhydrite is about 25% denser than gypsum, so the transformation of gypsum to anhydrite would be accompanied by shrinking rather than expansion, which would have been another potential way to explain the vein's positive relief.


Good question/s, ngunn. unsure.gif As ibasso pointed out, crystalline gypsum is quite soft as minerals go. You can scratch it with your fingernail. Marsophile hit the nail on the head. The absolute hardness of the mineral is not the key issue, it is the relative hardness compared to the rock within which the vein is enclosed.

Regarding anhydrite, that is also a good point, and one which might help explain Homestake's positive relief, but the vein has been identified as likely being gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O), and not anhydrite (CaSO4). From Salley Rayl's update, according to Ray Arvidson:
QUOTE
"Since Mini-TES [miniature thermal emission spectrometer] is not working, we really couldn't pin down the mineral phase based on the infrared. So the next best thing was to look at the vein with Pancam. It shows a dip at 1 micrometer, which is probably related to the presence of molecular water in the mineral, so it's calcium, and sulfur, it's water bearing. The best bet is it's gypsum, which is calcium sulfate with 2 waters in the unit cell," he explained.


QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Dec 9 2011, 11:31 AM) *
Mineral (hardness) and weatherability don't always corrrelate. Remember, in some climes limestone can be a resistant ridge-former and in others a weak valley-former. ...

That's the kicker, isn't it, Bill? In a real environment where mechanical abrasion isn't the only agent responsible for the wearing down of rocks, we need to consider several physical and chemical processes capable of breaking down rocks. It's sometimes tricky enough on earth, let alone on an alien planet. wink.gif If Homestake is embedded within soft sulfate sediments similar to those we have become familiar with on the Meridiani plains, perhaps this occurance resembles a gypsum crystal embedded within wallboard. wacko.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Dec 10 2011, 05:32 AM
Post #179


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Dec 9 2011, 10:39 PM) *
I found this explanation of the formation of gypsum "spearheads" ...

Fascinating...I wonder if ancient peoples actually used these twinned crystals as effective weapon points.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bernard
post Dec 10 2011, 12:36 PM
Post #180


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 29-November 05
From: france
Member No.: 591



QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Dec 10 2011, 06:32 AM) *
Fascinating...I wonder if ancient peoples actually used these twinned crystals as effective weapon points.



No, it's far too soft
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

40 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 10:32 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.