Cape York - Northern Havens, Sol 2780 - 2947 |
Cape York - Northern Havens, Sol 2780 - 2947 |
Dec 9 2011, 03:11 AM
Post
#166
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
I think that the importance of this discovery is not so much the discovery of a mineral probably formed in low-acidity water (that had been done first by Spirit, with Comanche) as it is the fact that the gypsum deposition was apparently done in situ. Comanche was moved to its present location from elsewhere, so there was little geological context to work with, whereas with Homestake, we have Endeavour Crater's rim and bowl to (I hope) make traverses over, in order to put this discovery into its spatial and temporal context.
|
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 04:49 AM
Post
#167
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 753 Joined: 23-October 04 From: Greensboro, NC USA Member No.: 103 |
Crystaline gypsum is a lot differnt from plasterboard. Think of the crystals in the Mexican cave... Nonetheless, gypsum is relatively soft relative to other minerals. It's "2" on Moh's Scale of Mineral Hardness, roughly in between the hardness of a pencil "lead" (graphite) and a fingernail. -------------------- Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com |
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 06:23 AM
Post
#168
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 507 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 10:41 AM
Post
#169
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 04:19 PM
Post
#170
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Florida & Texas, USA Member No.: 482 |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 04:44 PM
Post
#171
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 1-March 11 From: Houston, USA Member No.: 5860 |
Nonetheless, gypsum is relatively soft relative to other minerals. It's "2" on Moh's Scale of Mineral Hardness, roughly in between the hardness of a pencil "lead" (graphite) and a fingernail. With loss of water, gypsum can change to anhydrite, which rates 3.5 on Mohs. That's still pretty soft, especially compared to minerals in basalt (5ish-7ish). Moreover, anhydrite is about 25% denser than gypsum, so the transformation of gypsum to anhydrite would be accompanied by shrinking rather than expansion, which would have been another potential way to explain the vein's positive relief. |
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 05:31 PM
Post
#172
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2998 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
Good point, Eutectic.
Mineral hardness and weatherability don't always corrrelate. Remember, in some climes limestone can be a resistant ridge-former and in others a weak valley-former. The important thing is, is that this fracture fill is composed of CaSO4 and we need to consider the geochemical implications of that... --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_Oersted_* |
Dec 9 2011, 05:35 PM
Post
#173
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 06:54 PM
Post
#174
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 08:53 PM
Post
#175
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 22-September 08 From: Spain Member No.: 4350 |
Maybe the surrounding terrain wasn't eroded by wind, but just dissolved in water.
|
|
|
Dec 9 2011, 11:58 PM
Post
#176
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1083 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France Member No.: 172 |
Hmm, that arrowhead is made of flint if I'm not mistaken. Or did I misunderstand something? This is the developed crystalline form of gypsum : the arrowhead (links added hereabove). Gypsum arrowheads are very common here. We are being shown these since school in Paris and you see them oftenly when visiting the Paris underground quarries... http://www.urban-exploration.com/index.php...;r=TOIT%20PARIS Most of old houses in Paris and close to it (like mine) are made of rocks (taken from the quarries) and plaster made of gypsum (and also with a mix of those). Gypsum is also now transformed into construction panels easy to assemble and is considered as a very environmental-friendly material |
|
|
Dec 10 2011, 04:39 AM
Post
#177
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
Gypsum arrowheads are very common here.... I found this explanation of the formation of gypsum "spearheads" in the French Wikipedia: "Le gypse en fer de lance est le résultat de la macle de deux grands cristaux lenticulaires." Google translation: "Gypsum as a spearhead is the result of the twinning of two large lenticular crystals." Can you imagine if Opportunity imaged this (from vikingmars' second link) laying on Cape York?! |
|
|
||
Dec 10 2011, 04:42 AM
Post
#178
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
Gypsum is too soft, surely. Hardness 2. How would it stand up to erosion in this way? Gypsum is so soft, how can it make upstanding veins? Nonetheless, gypsum is relatively soft relative to other minerals. It's "2" on Moh's Scale of Mineral Hardness, roughly in between the hardness of a pencil "lead" (graphite) and a fingernail. It's clearly harder than the rock surrounding it, as evidenced by the drive-over. Perhaps the vein has only been exhumed relatively recently in geological terms. With loss of water, gypsum can change to anhydrite, which rates 3.5 on Mohs. That's still pretty soft, especially compared to minerals in basalt (5ish-7ish). Moreover, anhydrite is about 25% denser than gypsum, so the transformation of gypsum to anhydrite would be accompanied by shrinking rather than expansion, which would have been another potential way to explain the vein's positive relief. Good question/s, ngunn. As ibasso pointed out, crystalline gypsum is quite soft as minerals go. You can scratch it with your fingernail. Marsophile hit the nail on the head. The absolute hardness of the mineral is not the key issue, it is the relative hardness compared to the rock within which the vein is enclosed. Regarding anhydrite, that is also a good point, and one which might help explain Homestake's positive relief, but the vein has been identified as likely being gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O), and not anhydrite (CaSO4). From Salley Rayl's update, according to Ray Arvidson: QUOTE "Since Mini-TES [miniature thermal emission spectrometer] is not working, we really couldn't pin down the mineral phase based on the infrared. So the next best thing was to look at the vein with Pancam. It shows a dip at 1 micrometer, which is probably related to the presence of molecular water in the mineral, so it's calcium, and sulfur, it's water bearing. The best bet is it's gypsum, which is calcium sulfate with 2 waters in the unit cell," he explained. Mineral (hardness) and weatherability don't always corrrelate. Remember, in some climes limestone can be a resistant ridge-former and in others a weak valley-former. ... That's the kicker, isn't it, Bill? In a real environment where mechanical abrasion isn't the only agent responsible for the wearing down of rocks, we need to consider several physical and chemical processes capable of breaking down rocks. It's sometimes tricky enough on earth, let alone on an alien planet. If Homestake is embedded within soft sulfate sediments similar to those we have become familiar with on the Meridiani plains, perhaps this occurance resembles a gypsum crystal embedded within wallboard. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Dec 10 2011, 05:32 AM
Post
#179
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
I found this explanation of the formation of gypsum "spearheads" ... Fascinating...I wonder if ancient peoples actually used these twinned crystals as effective weapon points. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Dec 10 2011, 12:36 PM
Post
#180
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 29-November 05 From: france Member No.: 591 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 10:32 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |