IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Your Government In Action
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Dec 16 2005, 03:14 AM
Post #1





Guests






http://sciencedems.house.gov/press/PRArtic...spx?NewsID=1007 :

"[House] Science [Committee] Democrats lauded an agreement reached today on
the Conference Report for S. 1281, the NASA Authorization Act of 2005.
Following today's approval by the conference committee, the legislation is
tentatively scheduled for consideration by the full House this week...

"During the conference, Rep. Jackson-Lee was a strong proponent for... more
educational programs in the sciences for minorities..."

I should hope so, given that she showed up at JPL a few days after the Mars
Pathfinder landing and asked if it could photograph Neil Armstrong's
footprints.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Dec 16 2005, 11:45 AM
Post #2





Guests






I remember a story when I was in an UFO association, incredible but true: a guy came to us, telling he was pursued by a round bright spaceship, at night, and from mad terror he speeded up with his car on the small countryside roads, just to find that the "spaceship" was still above him...
After one minute of questionning it appeared that the "spaceship" was just the full Moon...


Still with the Moon, there are still many people here who believe that we cannot see the Moon at day. This is really incredible, they read this into a mickey comic when they are a child, and never raised their nose toward the sky to see it is not true.

That people don't know about basic astronomy is already a problem, but when they even not SEE...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ljk4-1
post Dec 16 2005, 03:02 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



And we have a former Canadian defense minister who recently declared that the US is planning for an "intergalactic" war as the reason for raising its defense budget.

I've known college-educated people who did not know what stars were, that the Moon had craters, and that the Sun "rose" in the east and "set" in the west.

I've met grown men who not only did not know what sundogs or moon rings were, but when shown them in reality were actually fearful of them. No, I did not time travel to 1305 Europe. I am thinking of ways to make a fortune during the next eclipse, however.

I frequently visit a local university observatory that has open house nights on Fridays. More often than not, it is the little children who know more about the stars and planets than their parents or the students who attend the college (and it ain't no trade school).

I taught an adult ed course on basic astronomy in the 1990s. I once asked my students - all adults - who was the first man to set foot on the Moon. I got mostly blank stares, with one student finally making the guess of John Glenn.

I had a high school student in my class who started out really eager to become an astronomer - until she discovered that there was math involved. I kid you not.

I remember an ABC news correspondent (Lynne Neary or Shear?) asking Carl Sagan when we were going to launch a manned mission to a star that was recently discovered at the time to have a protoplanetary disk.

I watched Charlie Rose interview two of the head managers of the Mars Rovers shortly after Spirit's landing in 2004 and essentially spend most of his time declaring he knew nothing about what NASA did or what was going on with Mars.

I remember either MacNeil or Lehrer (of the PBS MacNeil-Lehrer News Hour) become astonished to learn from someone he was interviewing that geosynchronous communications satellites orbit Earth at 22,000 miles altitude.

I recall the time David Grinspoon of Venus Revealed and Lonely Planet fame being "interviewed" by the DJs of a local Boston radio station who ended up asking him inane questions about global warming and other nonsense and not about Venus, the real reason he was there.

And on and on and on....


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Dec 17 2005, 05:54 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Dec 16 2005, 07:02 AM)
I've known college-educated people who did not know what stars were, that the Moon had craters, and that the Sun "rose" in the east and "set" in the west.
*


Before we draw conclusions from this... do you (any reader in particular) know that some languages have postpositions instead of prepositions? That SVO and SOV are the most common word orders of languages, but all six possible word orders have been know to occur? That languages with postpositions tend to be SOV? That South America has the most native languages of any continent? That Papua New Guinea has more than any other continent? Etc...

There is a whole world of less-obscure to more-obscure knowledge to be known about dozens of different fields. A common trend among people who who have specialized in one is to endlessly tsk-tsk the rest of the world because they haven't also specialized in that field. Probably the number of people who don't know the basics of comparative linguistics is about the same as the number of people who don't know the basics of astronomy. But it's not a reasonable conclusion that both of those population-wide shortcomings is a shame. What would your education consist of: 700 brief introductions to every field?

All told, if someone was going to pick a field not to know anything about, astronomy is a hell of a good choice in terms of day to day usefulness.

For the nth time, I'll say that the "tsk-tsk"ing is not a flattering characteristic of the cognoscenti. We can easily devise basic tests that you, too, would get a zero on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Richard Trigaux_*
post Dec 17 2005, 07:38 PM
Post #5





Guests






QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 17 2005, 05:54 PM)
All told, if someone was going to pick a field not to know anything about, astronomy is a hell of a good choice in terms of day to day usefulness.

For the nth time, I'll say that the "tsk-tsk"ing is not a flattering characteristic of the cognoscenti. We can easily devise basic tests that you, too, would get a zero on.
*



We do not speak of specialized knowledge, but of basic/general knowledge. That people don't know the decay mode of Aluminium 27 or calculate an orbit is perfectly understandable. That a guy is not able to recognize the Moon is much less.

Knowing what stars are or what is really going on with space exploration is of high philosophical/ethical/emotionnal signficance for us all: to undertand the world we live in. Yes it does not help to speculate at the stock exchange or things like that, but this does not remove any of its value. The problem is not with stock exchange, it is that people spend their life in the stock exchange and never look at the sky. Poor guies.

By he way I pass a good part of your test (knowing that South America and Papua have the most languages) because knowing other peoples with whom we are living together is ALSO of high philosophical/ethical/emotionnal signficance!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- BruceMoomaw   Your Government In Action   Dec 16 2005, 03:14 AM
- - Bill Harris   QUOTE The Congressional bonehead award goes to Rep...   Dec 16 2005, 05:25 AM
- - deglr6328   Wow, yeah, there's stupid and then there's...   Dec 16 2005, 06:42 AM
|- - Toma B   QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Dec 16 2005, 09:42 AM)Wow,...   Dec 16 2005, 08:32 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   a space education program for majority too would b...   Dec 16 2005, 08:20 AM
- - djellison   "Are there any people on it" is the most...   Dec 16 2005, 08:58 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   I remember a story when I was in an UFO associatio...   Dec 16 2005, 11:45 AM
|- - ljk4-1   And we have a former Canadian defense minister who...   Dec 16 2005, 03:02 PM
|- - MahFL   Untill quite recently my American wife ( who is a ...   Dec 16 2005, 04:05 PM
||- - Tom Ames   "When a chance peak over 11-year-old Taylor...   Dec 17 2005, 04:09 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Dec 16 2005, 07:02 AM)I...   Dec 17 2005, 05:54 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 17 2005, 05:54 PM)All t...   Dec 17 2005, 07:38 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 17 2005, 12:54 PM)Befor...   Dec 18 2005, 09:31 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Dec 18 2005, 09:31 PM)Pe...   Dec 19 2005, 08:39 AM
||- - Toma B   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 19 2005, 11:39 A...   Dec 19 2005, 09:07 AM
|||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Toma B @ Dec 19 2005, 09:07 AM)Many pe...   Dec 19 2005, 09:50 AM
|||- - Toma B   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 19 2005, 12:50 P...   Dec 19 2005, 10:40 AM
|||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Toma B @ Dec 19 2005, 10:40 AM)That wa...   Dec 19 2005, 11:48 AM
|||- - chris   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 19 2005, 11:48 A...   Dec 19 2005, 12:46 PM
||- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 19 2005, 03:39 A...   Dec 19 2005, 02:47 PM
|- - JRehling   Sure enough!   Dec 21 2005, 04:49 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 21 2005, 04:49 PM) Whe...   Dec 21 2005, 05:50 PM
|- - JRehling   Interesting thought.   Dec 21 2005, 07:48 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 21 2005, 07:48 PM)I all...   Dec 21 2005, 08:11 PM
||- - JRehling   Well put!   Dec 21 2005, 09:23 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 21 2005, 02:48 PM)I all...   Dec 21 2005, 08:28 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   Thanks ljk4-1 for alway quoting interesting scienc...   Dec 21 2005, 08:40 PM
- - deglr6328   QUOTE (Tom Ames @ Dec 17 2005, 04:09 PM)...   Dec 17 2005, 08:42 PM
- - TheChemist   Your hilarious onion links led me to : Coke-Sponso...   Dec 17 2005, 10:52 PM
- - RedSky   Here's an example from about 15 years ago on s...   Dec 18 2005, 01:27 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (RedSky @ Dec 18 2005, 01:27 AM)Similar...   Dec 18 2005, 08:31 AM
|- - ljk4-1   In Sunday's Book Review: 'A People's H...   Dec 18 2005, 03:19 PM
|- - Tom Ames   The review that follows, of Chris Mooney's bok...   Dec 18 2005, 03:25 PM
- - djellison   Boys - dont make me come in here!!! I...   Dec 22 2005, 02:48 PM
- - hugh   I thought that JRehling was reacting to the faintl...   Dec 23 2005, 11:34 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 06:49 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.