IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Pioneer 11 Io Image, At last....
tedstryk
post Aug 18 2005, 05:40 PM
Post #1


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



At last I have the Pioneer 11 Io image in its raw form. Below to the left is my best processing of a scan in a book (I tweaked the terminator in that image because it was too problematic, which is the reason for the appearance of a different phase compared to the view on the right). To the right is a preliminary view generated from the raw data. It seems to be considerably more detailed. I plan to post an updated Pioneer 11 Io page on my site in the next day or two.



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Aug 18 2005, 06:19 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Ooh, beautiful blog. I'm gonna link to that.

(This is off topic, but Doug, it would be so nice for the people with sites if signature links worked again...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Aug 18 2005, 08:21 PM
Post #3


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Thanks....


Here is my new Pioneer 11 Io page!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 18 2005, 08:45 PM
Post #4


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (mhoward @ Aug 18 2005, 06:19 PM)
Ooh, beautiful blog. I'm gonna link to that.

(This is off topic, but Doug, it would be so nice for the people with sites if signature links worked again...)
*


Sorry - I know what you mean - but it also means people can post stupidly long sigs with system configs, flash movies, big images etc - it's just all pointless.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Aug 18 2005, 08:53 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Including images in sigs seems stupid and pointless. Including links in sigs seems like the only valid reason for sigs (I note one in your own sig). It's too bad if the forum software doesn't make a distinction, that seems like an obvious area for improvement.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Aug 18 2005, 10:06 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Aug 18 2005, 09:21 PM)



Well done that man!


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Aug 19 2005, 05:46 PM
Post #7


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Aug 18 2005, 10:06 PM)
Well done that man!
*


It would be neat if someone good at rendering could make an image to compare and look for changes.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Aug 19 2005, 05:48 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



What's the sub-spacecraft latitude and longitude of the Pioneer 11 image?


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Aug 19 2005, 07:23 PM
Post #9


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Aug 19 2005, 05:48 PM)
What's the sub-spacecraft latitude and longitude of the Pioneer 11 image?
*



I am a bit confused, but I know the subspacecraft latitude was +60 and the degrees LCM was 184 (is this the longitude?). The phase angle is 67 degrees.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Aug 19 2005, 07:56 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3231
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Assuming it is, I've attached a reprojection of a Galileo Io basemap using 60, 184 as the central latitude and longitude.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Aug 19 2005, 08:38 PM
Post #11


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2250
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Aug 18 2005, 05:40 PM)
At last I have the Pioneer 11 Io image in its raw form.

Where did you obtain the image in raw form (i.e. not scanned from a paper copy) ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Aug 19 2005, 09:27 PM
Post #12


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



It is from a paper copy. The paper copy was the matrix of numbers that I manually converted to an image. On my site I describe how it was converted, and have lossless versions of the product.

I have rotated the image to the same angle as Jason's image, and have sized it down. The left image is Jason's, degraded to Pioneer size. The middle image is degraded a bit more. And on the right is from Pioneer. There are definitely some similar albedo paterns. The challenge would be to figure out what is artifact and what is change.



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 05:25 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.