IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Anti-satellite weapon test?, Is this true?
Thu
post Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 20-September 06
From: Hanoi, Vietnam
Member No.: 1164



According to this link, China fired a missile to destroy an orbiting weather satellite last week: http://www.spacewar.com/reports/China_Tras...e_Test_999.html

I am curios about what kind of projectile could be used? A "smart" one with on board guidance system or just a dumb one? How close did the "killer satellite" came to the target?

Does anybody have an idea?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
tty
post Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



Actually a satellite in LEO is not a particularly challenging target. Its position and trajectory is known in advance and it is usually a non-maneuvring target. Also it usually has a nice big cross-section in both the radar, IR and visual band and operates in a very uncluttered environment.

All that is needed is a reasonably precise suborbital rocket and a suitable warhead. However I doubt that the "ball-bearing/sand" solution is cost effective. Unless You release quite close to the target they would probably disperse too thinly to ensure a kill. It would probably be better to use a homing warhead with a proximity fuse. Anybody having the technology for the carrier rocket should be able to handle the guidance system and the warhead too.

tty
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jan 22 2007, 08:18 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (tty @ Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM) *
It would probably be better to use a homing warhead with a proximity fuse. Anybody having the technology for the carrier rocket should be able to handle the guidance system and the warhead too.

tty


It's a tad more difficult than it looks. Most aircraft missile systems don't use thrust to control attitude, but instead rely on aerodynamic forces. An exoatmospheric vehicle has to be precisely stabilised, and because it has to actively hunt down a target then spinning probably won't do. You're looking at 3-axis attitude control, plus an ability to change direction at very short notice. Some of the Star Wars kinetic kill vehicles not only were 3-axis stabilised, but also spun to deploy arms at the last moment and then also disintegrated to provide further frontal area. All this has to be arranged in a space of seconds, with space-hardened computers. All in all, it's a very tough call, and the US has done it only a very few times (and sometimes by moving the goalposts after the event). China's success is a major milestone, and speaks highly of their space technology.


Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM
Post #4


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



So with a bit of luck they might now consider that they have successfully shown all interested parties that they are well in contention in LEO and that they now need to demonstrate some serious long range remote capability - expect Chinese Moon, Mars and outer planets missions to follow shortly.

So it's time to go and learn Chinese folks so we can stay on top of CNSA's PR department.

(Just looking for the bright side since this is my 1000'th post. smile.gif )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 09:46 PM) *
(Just looking for the bright side since this is my 1000'th post. smile.gif )

My 900 was yesterday wink.gif
I was wondering if it was their first try of if we have infos that they've missed previously!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jan 23 2007, 11:42 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (climber @ Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM) *
My 900 was yesterday wink.gif
I was wondering if it was their first try of if we have infos that they've missed previously!


Interesting point. The ASAT engine plume would be highly visible in IR, so the US would almost certainly have seen the whole thing. Whether or not they'd have told anyone about previous attempts is a moot point, as the NRO (or whoever is running staring IR sensors in GEO) is notoriously shy and they'd rather not release any information which can be reverse-engineered to reveal their actual capabilities to any potential opponent. So the internal hierarchy of the US may well have known, and they may have told some of their regional allies, but that'd be about it - there's no international requirement for a nation to tell anyone else about sub-orbital activity if they don't want to, and the Chinese wanted a success rather than anything which might be seen as a failure. Personally, I'd be surprised if the Chinese managed an ASAT demonstration first time out, though the US appears to have done exactly that when they tried it. As an example of just how difficult it can be to launch big(ish) missiles from an aeroplane, see the whole NOTSNIK story!


Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Thu   Anti-satellite weapon test?   Jan 19 2007, 02:39 PM
- - climber   QUOTE (Thu @ Jan 19 2007, 03:39 PM) Accor...   Jan 19 2007, 03:06 PM
- - Lorne Ipsum   Nobody really knows the details, but most reports ...   Jan 19 2007, 06:51 PM
- - nprev   Anybody know what the inclination of the target sa...   Jan 20 2007, 01:59 AM
|- - OWW   QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 20 2007, 02:59 AM) I g...   Jan 20 2007, 12:12 PM
- - Thu   Thank you all for your information. Still no offic...   Jan 22 2007, 04:42 PM
- - djellison   Very very close to becoming a political thread her...   Jan 22 2007, 04:53 PM
|- - Chmee   The US did develop an anti-satellite weapon back i...   Jan 22 2007, 05:55 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (Chmee @ Jan 22 2007, 05:55 PM) lik...   Jan 22 2007, 06:29 PM
- - tty   Actually a satellite in LEO is not a particularly ...   Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (tty @ Jan 22 2007, 07:34 PM) It wo...   Jan 22 2007, 08:18 PM
|- - helvick   So with a bit of luck they might now consider that...   Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM
|- - climber   QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 09:46 PM) (...   Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM
||- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (climber @ Jan 23 2007, 08:55 AM) M...   Jan 23 2007, 11:42 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 22 2007, 08:46 PM) (...   Jan 23 2007, 11:31 AM
- - djellison   Just thinking in terms of 'impact window' ...   Jan 22 2007, 09:01 PM
|- - helvick   Your calculations are only valid for an orthogonal...   Jan 22 2007, 09:24 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 22 2007, 10:01 PM)...   Jan 23 2007, 07:32 AM
- - djellison   You don't need fusing - this was a kinetic imp...   Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 23 2007, 08:47 AM)...   Jan 23 2007, 11:11 AM
- - mchan   There was an article quoting unamed sources that t...   Jan 24 2007, 04:39 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (mchan @ Jan 24 2007, 04:39 AM) The...   Jan 24 2007, 12:11 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 01:11 PM) ...   Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (tty @ Jan 24 2007, 07:46 PM) The n...   Jan 24 2007, 09:14 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 24 2007, 10:14 PM) ...   Jan 25 2007, 07:07 AM
- - climber   Interesting article on this topic on Aviation Week...   Jan 24 2007, 03:56 PM
- - Thu   Finally, we have an official announcement from Chi...   Jan 25 2007, 01:07 AM
- - CosmicRocker   I rarely stray into this section of the Forum, and...   Jan 25 2007, 06:13 AM
- - nprev   Just to put a bit of (hopefully) UMSF-related spin...   Jan 26 2007, 02:35 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 08:48 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.