Dawn Mission, pre-launch disscusion |
![]() ![]() |
Dawn Mission, pre-launch disscusion |
Jul 6 2007, 11:45 PM
Post
#271
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
Hate to be the informer but its NET July 15 now. I have a feeling...
-------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Jul 7 2007, 12:11 AM
Post
#272
|
|
Guests |
Jeez, this is turning from bad to rotten, quickly. I wonder if Ed "The Axe" Weiler were still running SMD whether he would be close to saying, "Take it off the pad and ship it to NASM."
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 02:19 AM
Post
#273
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 548 Joined: 19-March 05 From: Princeton, NJ, USA Member No.: 212 |
Here is the latest just in on the July 15 launch target from spaceflightnow.com
------ FRIDAY, JULY 6, 2007 2355 GMT (7:55 p.m. EDT) ANOTHER DELAY. The Dawn asteroid exploration mission won't be launching before Sunday, July 15, NASA officials announced Friday evening after extensive decisions about the availability of downrange tracking assets and the overall readiness to go fly. The United Launch Alliance Delta 2-Heavy rocket stands fully assembled with Dawn nestled inside the vehicle's nose cone at Cape Canaveral's pad 17B. But this is the third delay in the past two days for the launch. Stormy weather prevented the Delta 2 rocket's second stage from being fueled on Thursday, forcing the liftoff to be delayed from Saturday to Sunday. NASA decided early Friday morning to slip the launch another 24 hours - to Monday - because of troubles with a telemetry-relay aircraft. Problems with the tracking plane and delays getting a substitute ship into the Atlantic Ocean region has been a source of headaches for the launch officials. Either the aircraft or the instrumented ship is required to receive telemetry from the rocket during the second and third stage firings off the west-central coast of Africa. Without a mobile tracking asset in place, engineers would have no insight or data while those critical events of the launch occur. NASA is racing against the calendar because Dawn's current launch opportunity closes July 19, giving just a few days left to get the spacecraft on the required trajectory to fly past Mars for a sling-shot maneuver and then into the asteroid belt for its rendezvous with Vesta and Ceres over the next eight years. If this period is missed, another one opens in September and extends through late October. What impact, if any, this latest delay could have to the planned August 3 launch of the Mars lander Phoenix aboard another Delta 2 rocket from the neighboring pad is not immediately clear. The alignment of the planets dictates a tight August 3 to August 24 window for the Phoenix liftoff to happen. The start of Dawn's mission to examine up close two of the solar system's largest asteroids has been hit by a number of setbacks, including outright cancellation of the project in March 2006. After a heated controversy, NASA restarted the mission less than a month later. Plans called for the launch to happen June 20, but that date was scrapped because more time was needed to prepare the Delta rocket before on-pad assembly could start. Then a targeted June 30 launch day was doomed when the pad's crane developed a problem last month, causing a hiatus in attaching the solid-fuel boosters. Launch on July 15 would be possible during a window stretching from 3:22 to 3:54 p.m. EDT. |
|
|
|
| Guest_Analyst_* |
Jul 7 2007, 01:15 PM
Post
#274
|
|
Guests |
Jeez, this is turning from bad to rotten, quickly. I wonder if Ed "The Axe" Weiler were still running SMD whether he would be close to saying, "Take it off the pad and ship it to NASM." AFAIK all delays from June 20th onwards have nothing to do with the spacecraft itself but with the launch vehicle or support equipment (tracking assets, crane etc.). I repeat myself with saying this isn't only bad luck but also a lack of planning, contincency planning, lack of strategy etc. Analyst |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 01:21 PM
Post
#275
|
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 13243 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Anyone who has read and understood Jim's posts can see why the situation is as it is - and given the resources available, no ammount of contingency or planning could have avoided it.
Doug |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 02:39 PM
Post
#276
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
AFAIK all delays from June 20th onwards have nothing to do with the spacecraft itself but with the launch vehicle or support equipment (tracking assets, crane etc.). I repeat myself with saying this isn't only bad luck but also a lack of planning, contincency planning, lack of strategy etc. Analyst Not so. You have no clue what is going on. No amount of planning would have avoided these "things" and allowed Dawn to launch any earlier. The strategy is to launch Dawn ASAP 1. Crane. Crap happens. No amount of planning would avoid this 2. TM airplane upon returning from depot maintenance experiences a delamination of an aileron 3. TM airplane experiences failure in mission equipment 4. TM ship experiences stronger currents than planned 5. weather A. TM airplane is owned by the Army and supports many users, most with higher priorities B. The TM equipment is owned by the USAF and the boat is chartered. C. NASA "contracts" both for assets, but they managed by their owning org, NASA just requests where they are needed and when. How they get their is determined by the owning org. Let's see you put together a decision matrix to take all this into account. Meanwhile, spacecraft contractor is charging for the delays and ULA is charging for the delays (TM is a NASA requirement). |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 03:00 PM
Post
#277
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 6476 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Yeow. Sounds horribly familiar, Jim, and I agree with you. The only thing in your list that makes me mad is that delaminated aileron; that definitely should have been caught & fixed by the Depot contractor, and I hope NASA/DCMA(?) is raising hell with them about it...pretty shoddy.
Come to that, though, most planes need at least two weeks to shake out problems after coming out of Depot; pity there apparently isn't enough asset depth to permit this to happen & it had to fly a hot mission so soon. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 03:04 PM
Post
#278
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3534 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Crap happens. I blame everything that's happened on gremlins. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 03:59 PM
Post
#279
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 08:42 PM
Post
#280
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
It's off till September officially. :-(
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 08:54 PM
Post
#281
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 264 Joined: 1-July 05 From: New York City Member No.: 424 |
Since they didn't fuel the second stage, I gather (based on the press conference) that they will have a longer September window than if they had been forced to find a new second stage. That's a (very) small sliver lining.
TTT |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 09:01 PM
Post
#282
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
I believe the September window (planetary window) opens Sept. 7. I might be wrong though.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 11:08 PM
Post
#283
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 29-December 05 From: NE Oh, USA Member No.: 627 |
All...
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2007/jul/H...stpone_Sep.html "NASA will hold a news briefing at 11:30 a.m. EDT on Monday, July 9, to preview the launch of the Phoenix Mars Lander. Prior to the Phoenix presentations, media will have the opportunity to learn in more detail about the rescheduled Dawn launch.[i][u] The briefing will originate from the NASA Headquarters auditorium, 300 E St., S.W., Washington. It will air live on NASA Television and be streamed online at: http://www.nasa.gov/ntv" Craig |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2007, 11:23 PM
Post
#284
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 01:00 AM
Post
#285
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 6476 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
(sigh)...
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 08:20 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|