IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mission: Hayabusa 2
punkboi
post Apr 10 2013, 04:39 AM
Post #76


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 515
Joined: 25-October 05
From: California
Member No.: 535



You can now submit your name on the Japanese version of JAXA's Hayabusa 2 page:

http://153.122.7.196/form/

(Deadline: Juy 16 - 12:00 PM JST)

The English version should be up on The Planetary Society's website this Saturday (April 13)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
punkboi
post Apr 16 2013, 12:36 AM
Post #77


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 515
Joined: 25-October 05
From: California
Member No.: 535



You can now submit your name on The Planetary Society's website:

http://www.planetary.org/get-involved/messages/hayabusa-2/


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pandaneko
post Apr 30 2013, 08:33 AM
Post #78


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 528
Joined: 17-April 10
From: Kamakura, Japan
Member No.: 5323



I have checked with JAXA HP in English, but I could not find immediately if what follows is actually carried there. So, just in case, what follows is from Nihon Keizai Shimbun dated 23 April.

"JAXA are inviting 2 piggy-back interplanetary space probes:

JAXA announced on 23 April that they will invite 2 piggy-backs to be launched with Hayabusa 2 on their H2A rocket. Invitation period is by the end of May and selection will be made at the end of June. 2 space probes of each less than 50 kg are invited. Hayabusa 2 itself will weigh 600 kg."

This makes me think and wonder as follows.

1. Can anybody make proposals so quickly?
2. This must be just powdering operation and the infomation has been circulating within intimate circles, both domestic and intrernational, for a long time.

P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stone
post Apr 30 2013, 12:52 PM
Post #79


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 21-January 13
Member No.: 6845



" 2 piggy-backs to be launched with Hayabusa 2 "

I thought the ATOM (Mars aero-capture mission ) would be one of those missions?
I read something about it in 2012.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Apr 30 2013, 05:00 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1146
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



according to this presentation (undated but named "fall 2012")

QUOTE
Mars aero-capture mission ATOM -> Delayed
Phase-A study continues, but launch with Hayabusa-2 became difficult.



--------------------
I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.

James Van Allen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TheAnt
post Apr 30 2013, 07:01 PM
Post #81


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 119
Joined: 12-February 12
Member No.: 6336



QUOTE (pandaneko @ Apr 30 2013, 10:33 AM) *
1. Can anybody make proposals so quickly?


I honestly don't think so, just a proposal can take up to a year to get a heads up. Then they would have to build it.

Even if some agency or university were sitting on one suitable unlaunched craft/probe, they would have to practically carry it out the door directly for intergation and testing.
So it sound like a nice offer, though one without actual candidates, now that delays have created a vacant spot - perhaps even two.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post May 1 2013, 01:23 AM
Post #82


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 618
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Vancouver, British Columbia
Member No.: 5221



Is it also too late to use those 50 kilos on Hayabusa 2 itself, somehow? Or is this offer specifically for other craft on the same launcher? I mean it would be a waste to just let an opportunity like this go.


--------------------
To a body of infinite size there can be ascribed neither centre nor boundary... Thus the Earth no more than any other world is at the centre. -Giordano Bruno, 1584.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post May 1 2013, 03:16 AM
Post #83


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6474
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Sure, but it would be a risk to rush a development & integration effort with too little time for testing before the launch date. Let's see what they do.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post May 1 2013, 09:54 AM
Post #84


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1146
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



for more info on the Mars aerocapture demonstrator see this JAXA presentation


--------------------
I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.

James Van Allen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vjkane
post May 2 2013, 12:04 AM
Post #85


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 22-April 05
Member No.: 351



Aviation Week and Space Technology reports that Japan will be cutting back on its space plans and, "But former high-priority goals to promote environmental monitoring, human space activities and putting robots on the Moon are now much lower priorities and will have to fight for funding." I don't know how this will affect Mars plans. Hayabusa-type missions are apparently still planned.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 12:47 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.