IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

85 Pages V  « < 76 77 78 79 80 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
InSight Surface Operations, 26 Nov 2018- 21 Dec 2022
PaulH51
post Aug 9 2021, 11:02 PM
Post #1156


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Looks like InSight's cameras may have witnessed a dust lifting event between Sols 943 & 946
Here's an ICC GIF using ICC frames from those 2 sols.
Look beyond the WTS for a bright streak across the ground, it's a little difficult to see in these unprocessed images, but I'm sure the image wizards here can increase the difference etc.
Fingers crossed that a gust of wind removed some of the dust on the lander's solar arrays smile.gif
Attached Image

A processed GIF was posted on Twitter link in also contains links to the raw frames. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/J.Roger.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Aug 10 2021, 02:35 AM
Post #1157


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2079
Joined: 13-February 10
From: Ontario
Member No.: 5221



An image of the solar arrays would settle the matter (but need power to move the arm, of course).
Almost 1 month after aphelion...fingers crossed that the worst is over.....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Aug 10 2021, 07:45 AM
Post #1158


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



In this image I merged 946 with a negative of 943, cranked up the contrast and merged the result with the original 943 to how where things are. The affected surface darkens as bright dust is stripped away. There have been other such events, including one streak in almost exactly the same place between sols 253 and 261 (Figure 10 in this paper:

Charalambous, C., McClean, J., Baker, M., Pike, T., Golombek, M., Lemmon, M.T., Ansan, V., Perrin, C., Spiga, A., Lorenz, R.D. and Banks, M., 2021. Vortex-dominated aeolian activity at InSight's landing site, Part 1: Multi-instrument observations, analysis, and implications. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 126(6), p.e2020JE006757.)


BUT - this streak is much easier to see in the difference images.

Phil


Attached Image



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Aug 11 2021, 03:14 AM
Post #1159


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



Hey Paul, Phil,
a quickie try to get that streak more visible
spots of dust on the lens are coming off too...
GIF -- two frames
Attached Image



--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Aug 11 2021, 04:02 AM
Post #1160


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (PDP8E @ Aug 11 2021, 11:14 AM) *
Hey Paul, Phil,
a quickie try to get that streak more visible
spots of dust on the lens are coming off too...

That's great news, the lens on the ICC camera is a lot closer to the solar arrays compared to the other side of the WTS smile.gif
Fingers and toes crossed for a few more watt/hours from a small cleaning event smile.gif

Thankyou... dd.gif dd.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Aug 11 2021, 03:02 PM
Post #1161


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



Would be capriciously fitting if the weather station wasn't recording, but hopefully the watthours tell the tale.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Sep 10 2021, 11:16 PM
Post #1162


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 610
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



It doesnt cover the recent sand-sprinkling cleaning efforts on InSight, but I have a paper just out (open access) that reviews the dust accumulation and removal on solar arrays on Mars landers/rovers (and Curiosity's UV sensors)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2021.105337
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Sep 11 2021, 02:38 AM
Post #1163


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



QUOTE (rlorenz @ Sep 10 2021, 03:16 PM) *
It doesnt cover the recent sand-sprinkling cleaning efforts on InSight, but I have a paper just out (open access) that reviews the dust accumulation and removal on solar arrays on Mars landers/rovers (and Curiosity's UV sensors)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2021.105337

Thanks for sharing. Have studies been done of the feasibility of including a scale on a lander to weigh dust accumulation?

Unrelated to dust accumulation, do you have any good references for estimates of Mars' daylight spectral power distribution?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rlorenz
post Sep 11 2021, 11:27 PM
Post #1164


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 610
Joined: 23-February 07
From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1764



QUOTE (Brian Swift @ Sep 10 2021, 09:38 PM) *
Unrelated to dust accumulation, do you have any good references for estimates of Mars' daylight spectral power distribution?


The Crisp paper cited in my article is one.
you could also look at https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/bitstream/handle/2....pdf?sequence=1
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 12 2021, 12:23 AM
Post #1165


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



As for a scale on the lander to weigh dust accumulation... it would be like the time I took my car to the recycling place to drop off some styrofoam packaging. They weighed the car, I dropped off a few chunks of styrofoam and they weighed the car again. Not a lot of difference!

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brian Swift
post Sep 12 2021, 04:22 AM
Post #1166


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 18-September 17
Member No.: 8250



QUOTE (rlorenz @ Sep 11 2021, 03:27 PM) *
The Crisp paper cited in my article is one.
you could also look at https://trs.jpl.nasa.gov/bitstream/handle/2....pdf?sequence=1

Thanks for the response. I'll see if I can find a non-paywalled version of the Crisp paper.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fox
post Sep 18 2021, 06:35 PM
Post #1167


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 5-January 20
Member No.: 8735



1000 sols!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Sep 22 2021, 05:31 PM
Post #1168


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 443
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



QUOTE
NASA’s InSight Finds Three Big Marsquakes, Thanks to Solar-Panel Dusting
The lander cleared enough dust from one solar panel to keep its seismometer on through the summer, allowing scientists to study the three biggest quakes they’ve seen on Mars.
On Sept. 18, NASA’s InSight lander celebrated its 1,000th Martian day, or sol, by measuring one of the biggest, longest-lasting marsquakes the mission has ever detected. The temblor is estimated to be about a magnitude 4.2 and shook for nearly an hour-and-a-half.

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-insight...r-panel-dusting
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 27 2021, 11:57 PM
Post #1169


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This link goes to a presentation by Bruce Banerdt to MEPAG in September:

https://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/meeting/2021-09/...EPAG%20VM13.pdf


Check out especially slides 12 and 13 (text and a graph of the power budget). We just squeaked through the cold period around aphelion and now power is increasing again, but without a cleaning event the mission team project "... energy dropping below operational minimums in the May June timeframe." In other words it looks like we may lose the mission in 8 months if things progress as expected.

It would be nice if my interpretation is too pessimistic... but is it?

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Oct 28 2021, 01:22 AM
Post #1170


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2511
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Oct 27 2021, 04:57 PM) *
It would be nice if my interpretation is too pessimistic... but is it?

Not a lot of room for ambiguity there. I'd say the biggest open question is how much margin there is on the survival energy threshold.

I have no particular knowledge so this is just from reading the slides.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

85 Pages V  « < 76 77 78 79 80 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 10:07 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.